• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the Medical Renaissance an important period in medical history?

Extracts from this document...


Was the Medical Renaissance an important period in medical history? This question could be argued both ways: it either was, or it was not. It is obvious that it was an important period because of the discoveries about anatomy. There are clear differentiations between discoveries in 1350 to those in at the end of the Medical Renaissance. Claudius Galen proved many ideas (some in his sixty books, ie: "On Anatomy") like Herophilus' theory of the brain controlling the body, and he also discovered veins. Not only this, but he thought that the body burnt up blood, and that there is an organ (namely the liver) to reproduce the blood used. This was naturally wrong; and also, for example, he said that human jawbones are of two separate pieces - this was flawed, only because he worked on other animals instead of humans. This theory is true of the dog, however! His theories were indeed incorrect but one could not criticise him, or they would have to 'answer to' the church. (They 'backed' him because he had the theory of the creator). ...read more.


Later, that night, he discovered that those treated with his own mixture were healing very nicely, but those treated with the old Jean de Vigo 'trick' were very ill, some even perished. This was an important breakthrough, and was published in his book, but ideas travelled slowly with this, as the hot oil method was used for years and years to come. Par� was also responsible for the ideas of ligatures: thin threads of silk to tie up arteries to stop mass bleeding. This was, on the whole, successful, however sometimes caused infection. Had an appropriate antiseptic been available, it would have been the cause of very few problems. However, as a direct result of Par�'s work, ligatures were later used made out of cat's intestine, which dissolved in the body, so as to cause no infections by threads 'hanging out' of the wound. Elsewhere, desperate and 'negative' surgery was starting to occur, such as amputations. This happened when it was thought that nothing else could be done, and this would be the only resolution and option open. What I feel is an amazing is that hospitals in this era worked to the ethos, which is the complete opposite to today's hospital's ethos. ...read more.


Only about 20% of people lived beyond the age of 60, whereas the vast majority of today's population do. On the whole, life expectancy was the same, and especially those dying were the 'at risk groups' (ie: the under 20's). This all links back to the original factor. People could not expect to live longer than previously, just because the real causes of disease had not yet been discovered. Once it had, time could be better spent in increasing life expectancy much more effectively than was already being done. Overall, the period of 400 years between 1350 and 1750 was not very important because the discoveries did not improve life expectancy much. Granted, discoveries were being made, and that was a significant breakthrough; but if one considers logically the period before, that in which fewer breakthroughs were being made, the life expectancy stayed much the same. In my opinion, although breakthroughs were being made, notably regarding anatomy and physiology, they didn't seem to travel very fast at all. I agree that it was an important period overall in what it produced, but the fact of the matter is, is that life expectancy didn't change much, and I think that is the main thing to consider when identifying and classifying 'important' periods in time. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Why did the discoveries of the Renaissance make little practical difference to medical treatment ...

    3 star(s)

    Microscopes could not detect bacteria or viruses and as such left scientists in the dark about the real cause of disease.)

  2. Was 1750-1900 an era of progress?

    In 1750 transport and the roads were very poor. Most average people could only travel on foot and the rich, by horse and carriage. Both ways were very slow. By 1900 transport was faster and more efficient. This was because railways and canals had been invented and at an affordable price many people could travel with ease.

  1. 4 Humours

    This obviously portrays that religious magical rites and purificatory rites were intertwined in the healing process as well as in creating a proper lifestyle. Though Egyptian medical practices by no means could rival that of the present day physicians, Egyptian healers engaged in surgery, prescriptive, and many other healing practices still found today.

  2. Am I not a Man and a brother?

    or protest because he might whip Samuel as well as me if I protest. The overseer, then, to my surprise stop his whipping and warned me not to do that anymore or Master John might sell Samuel away. He told to case my feeding at once and goes back to work but whip me no further.

  1. Why did Tilbury Fort develop into an important fortified site during the Renaissance ...

    In 1530 Henry VIII had been married to Catherine of Aragon for 18 years however he felt she was too old to have a son. Henry needed a son to be his heir. He wanted to divorce Catherine and marry Anne Boleyn who was young enough to give him a son.

  2. During the Medieval Period why was it important for nobles to build castles?

    This is where the construction of motte-and-bailey forts came in. We know he used them as much of the earth-works from them survive today, and in the tapestry commissioned by Bishop Odo of Bayeux, William's half brother, the erecting of a motte-and-bailey fort is shown (source 1).

  1. 'It seems that history is to blame.' (Joyce, Ulysses) Discuss the representation of ...

    The positions assumed by Yolland and Owen over the future of the Irish language are in complete antithesis to the attitudes one would anticipate. Although romantic, it is the English army officer who is the main voice in favour of preserving the Irish language.

  2. Why did the discoveries of the Renaissance period have so little impact of medical ...

    The increased printing helped to spread knowledge of medicine to a larger audience but the knowledge was restricted. This was due to the technology not being very advanced, there were few microscopes so doctors could not see what caused disease, how to cure it or how to improve the existing medical treatments.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work