• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the Medical Renaissance an important period in medical history?

Extracts from this document...


Was the Medical Renaissance an important period in medical history? This question could be argued both ways: it either was, or it was not. It is obvious that it was an important period because of the discoveries about anatomy. There are clear differentiations between discoveries in 1350 to those in at the end of the Medical Renaissance. Claudius Galen proved many ideas (some in his sixty books, ie: "On Anatomy") like Herophilus' theory of the brain controlling the body, and he also discovered veins. Not only this, but he thought that the body burnt up blood, and that there is an organ (namely the liver) to reproduce the blood used. This was naturally wrong; and also, for example, he said that human jawbones are of two separate pieces - this was flawed, only because he worked on other animals instead of humans. This theory is true of the dog, however! His theories were indeed incorrect but one could not criticise him, or they would have to 'answer to' the church. (They 'backed' him because he had the theory of the creator). ...read more.


Later, that night, he discovered that those treated with his own mixture were healing very nicely, but those treated with the old Jean de Vigo 'trick' were very ill, some even perished. This was an important breakthrough, and was published in his book, but ideas travelled slowly with this, as the hot oil method was used for years and years to come. Par� was also responsible for the ideas of ligatures: thin threads of silk to tie up arteries to stop mass bleeding. This was, on the whole, successful, however sometimes caused infection. Had an appropriate antiseptic been available, it would have been the cause of very few problems. However, as a direct result of Par�'s work, ligatures were later used made out of cat's intestine, which dissolved in the body, so as to cause no infections by threads 'hanging out' of the wound. Elsewhere, desperate and 'negative' surgery was starting to occur, such as amputations. This happened when it was thought that nothing else could be done, and this would be the only resolution and option open. What I feel is an amazing is that hospitals in this era worked to the ethos, which is the complete opposite to today's hospital's ethos. ...read more.


Only about 20% of people lived beyond the age of 60, whereas the vast majority of today's population do. On the whole, life expectancy was the same, and especially those dying were the 'at risk groups' (ie: the under 20's). This all links back to the original factor. People could not expect to live longer than previously, just because the real causes of disease had not yet been discovered. Once it had, time could be better spent in increasing life expectancy much more effectively than was already being done. Overall, the period of 400 years between 1350 and 1750 was not very important because the discoveries did not improve life expectancy much. Granted, discoveries were being made, and that was a significant breakthrough; but if one considers logically the period before, that in which fewer breakthroughs were being made, the life expectancy stayed much the same. In my opinion, although breakthroughs were being made, notably regarding anatomy and physiology, they didn't seem to travel very fast at all. I agree that it was an important period overall in what it produced, but the fact of the matter is, is that life expectancy didn't change much, and I think that is the main thing to consider when identifying and classifying 'important' periods in time. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. 'How did Hegel envisage the course of history and upon what did he base ...

    model for the full realisation of freedom, the modern constitutional model as it evolved out of the French Revolution and the restoration seemed to him to move clearly in that direction.'43 'It is the modern-post 1815 world of Western Europe that Hegel sees as the apex of historical development.'44 It

  2. Am I not a Man and a brother?

    The white though, always think they are more superior. That was what I thought but latter on I found out that there are some good white whom they call abolitions against slavery as well, it was unbelievable when I first found out because from my captured to the enslavement, all the whites I met treaded us like animals but it is true, there are good white people.

  1. Why did Tilbury Fort develop into an important fortified site during the Renaissance ...

    In 1530 Henry VIII had been married to Catherine of Aragon for 18 years however he felt she was too old to have a son. Henry needed a son to be his heir. He wanted to divorce Catherine and marry Anne Boleyn who was young enough to give him a son.

  2. During the Medieval Period why was it important for nobles to build castles?

    The tower, in case of attack, could be used to rain arrows down on the attacker and hold off the attack. Below the motte was a much larger, flatter, but lower mound, making the bailey of the motte-and-bailey.

  1. 'It seems that history is to blame.' (Joyce, Ulysses) Discuss the representation of ...

    O'Neill recognises the duality of his situation, a duality inherent to Irish history on the whole, it seems. O'Neill is a member of the Protestant, English court, yet also the leader of the Gaelic chieftains; a Catholic Irishman married to a Protestant 'Upstart;' a leading Irish politician with an 'Old English' secretary.

  2. The purpose of Stanton Drew Stone Circles

    important role as they would have used it as a supply but may also have used it for other activities. I conclude that firstly the church disrupting the alignments may also have been responsible for vandalism of the stones because of them being 'evil'.

  1. Why did the discoveries of the Renaissance period have so little impact of medical ...

    The increased printing helped to spread knowledge of medicine to a larger audience but the knowledge was restricted. This was due to the technology not being very advanced, there were few microscopes so doctors could not see what caused disease, how to cure it or how to improve the existing medical treatments.

  2. History of plastic surgery; how plastic surgery became a usual thing in Korea

    Some of the greatest medical talent devoted themselves fully both to exploring the history of plastic surgery and creating new techniques to treat men maimed by the war. Important steps in American history of plastic surgery took place due to the work of this institution, such as recognition of the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work