• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the Medical Renaissance an important period in medical history?

Extracts from this document...


Was the Medical Renaissance an important period in medical history? This question could be argued both ways: it either was, or it was not. It is obvious that it was an important period because of the discoveries about anatomy. There are clear differentiations between discoveries in 1350 to those in at the end of the Medical Renaissance. Claudius Galen proved many ideas (some in his sixty books, ie: "On Anatomy") like Herophilus' theory of the brain controlling the body, and he also discovered veins. Not only this, but he thought that the body burnt up blood, and that there is an organ (namely the liver) to reproduce the blood used. This was naturally wrong; and also, for example, he said that human jawbones are of two separate pieces - this was flawed, only because he worked on other animals instead of humans. This theory is true of the dog, however! His theories were indeed incorrect but one could not criticise him, or they would have to 'answer to' the church. (They 'backed' him because he had the theory of the creator). ...read more.


Later, that night, he discovered that those treated with his own mixture were healing very nicely, but those treated with the old Jean de Vigo 'trick' were very ill, some even perished. This was an important breakthrough, and was published in his book, but ideas travelled slowly with this, as the hot oil method was used for years and years to come. Par� was also responsible for the ideas of ligatures: thin threads of silk to tie up arteries to stop mass bleeding. This was, on the whole, successful, however sometimes caused infection. Had an appropriate antiseptic been available, it would have been the cause of very few problems. However, as a direct result of Par�'s work, ligatures were later used made out of cat's intestine, which dissolved in the body, so as to cause no infections by threads 'hanging out' of the wound. Elsewhere, desperate and 'negative' surgery was starting to occur, such as amputations. This happened when it was thought that nothing else could be done, and this would be the only resolution and option open. What I feel is an amazing is that hospitals in this era worked to the ethos, which is the complete opposite to today's hospital's ethos. ...read more.


Only about 20% of people lived beyond the age of 60, whereas the vast majority of today's population do. On the whole, life expectancy was the same, and especially those dying were the 'at risk groups' (ie: the under 20's). This all links back to the original factor. People could not expect to live longer than previously, just because the real causes of disease had not yet been discovered. Once it had, time could be better spent in increasing life expectancy much more effectively than was already being done. Overall, the period of 400 years between 1350 and 1750 was not very important because the discoveries did not improve life expectancy much. Granted, discoveries were being made, and that was a significant breakthrough; but if one considers logically the period before, that in which fewer breakthroughs were being made, the life expectancy stayed much the same. In my opinion, although breakthroughs were being made, notably regarding anatomy and physiology, they didn't seem to travel very fast at all. I agree that it was an important period overall in what it produced, but the fact of the matter is, is that life expectancy didn't change much, and I think that is the main thing to consider when identifying and classifying 'important' periods in time. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Was 1750-1900 an era of progress?

    These changes were progress because factories were making new products and so life was moving on and new things were being developed, such as new recipes because new ingredients had been made in the factories. Furthermore, there were changes in transport. In 1750 transport and the roads were very poor.

  2. Am I not a Man and a brother?

    bedding or any thing at all stained on any laundry and had not be washed off. But sometimes, these were impossible to be washed off. I worried about her all the time because every now and then, I would hear rumours and sometimes see slaves being whipped to death.

  1. During the Medieval Period why was it important for nobles to build castles?

    Trying to seize power of a country was not something to be taken on lightly and William would need all the help he could get, and castles really gave him that edge. He needed something that could be erected relatively quickly and would provide a good base of operations and somewhere safe for his armies to be billeted and garrisoned.

  2. Behavioural Theories.

    Stained and cracked with age, these large limestone buildings display obvious German architecture reminiscent of the early the late 1800s. The most famous spot on High Street, though, and the center of my research, is somewhat of a hole-in-the-wall. Covered in such publications as Texas Monthly and Southern Living, Gael's

  1. How much progress had been made in medicine by the end of the renaissance?

    Another development was travel. People were now beginning to travel abroad, to places like America, where they learned new techniques of treating sick people, but they also bought new ingredients back for medicines and cures. They also travelled to the Arab world as well at the end of the Middle

  2. 'It seems that history is to blame.' (Joyce, Ulysses) Discuss the representation of ...

    The fact that it is O'Neill who voices these discrepancies accentuates again the ironies of his position. In the play this reversal of stereotypes between the characters position and their opinions occurs regularly. This political disparity can also be seen in Translations through the reference to O'Donnell.

  1. History of plastic surgery; how plastic surgery became a usual thing in Korea

    In a survey done by Women Sense magazine in Korea in the year of 2005, 47% of the participants said they had underwent cosmetic surgery before they entered the job force. They had replied that good looking appearance can have advantages because it is likely that they good have good images on job interviews.

  2. Why did the discoveries of the Renaissance period have so little impact of medical ...

    The increased printing helped to spread knowledge of medicine to a larger audience but the knowledge was restricted. This was due to the technology not being very advanced, there were few microscopes so doctors could not see what caused disease, how to cure it or how to improve the existing medical treatments.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work