• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the Nazi seizure of power an inevitable consequence of the weakness of the Weimar Republic?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Was the Nazi seizure of power an inevitable consequence of the weakness of the Weimar Republic? The question of whether the Nazi seizure of power was an inevitable consequence of the weakness of Weimar is one that many historians have debated and questioned. It remains a central issue among scholars to date. The Nazi seizure of power is a debate in which there are many aspects of thinking. Was Weimar doomed to fail? Did the Republic have any other option but to be replaced by a dictatorship, or was there an alternative? Or controversially, was Hitler at the right place, at the right time? Many historians have argued that the Weimar Republic was doomed from birth, and therefore it was only inevitable that a stronger party would overthrow the Republic. However, many suggest there is more to the Nazi seizure of power than Weimar being a weak Republic. In order to look into the issue of whether the seizure of power by the Nazis, was an inevitable consequence of the weakness of the Republic a number of questions need to be analysed. ...read more.

Middle

Overall, we can see that the Weimar republic did not have an easy birth, and fought great difficulties, however, during the golden years the political and economic atmosphere was relatively stable, and brought hope to the republic, yet it was un-foreseeable circumstances that shocked and weakened the Republic.. The Nazi party or the NSDAP were politically active during the 1920s, however the NSDAP were a relatively small extremist group, and they were active in campaigning against the current government. The most famous early protest was the Beer Hall putsch, yet this sent Hitler to prison, and the NSDAP were less active during this time. Later, Hitler and his party played on the weaknesses of the republic, as well as the use of violence, and intimidation to control their opposition; this resulted in the creation of a climate of fear, helping the party win seats and elections. So to a small degree we can suggest he did seize power, yet, he did it in a manipulating way. The high unemployment and inflation was an aspect that Hitler protected about, he gave the public a scapegoat by blaming the November Criminals for the political atmosphere and environment Germany was in, saying they stabbed Germany in the back after accepting the treaty of Versailles. ...read more.

Conclusion

the Weimar republic as the republic allowed him into the Reich, it was his manipulation that acquired him the power to lead a dictatorship. Therefore, the term seized power is misleading, as he gained power through combination of political intrigue, and violence, as well as help from Hindenburg when he appointed him as chancellor, if it was not for these events Hitler may have never gained ruthless control of Germany. 1 Richard J Evan, The coming of the Third Reich, (Penguin Books 2004) pp.236-237 2 Richard J Evan, The coming of the Third Reich, (Penguin Books 2004) p.235 3 J Noakes, G Pridham, Nazism 1919-1945, the rise to power 1919-1934, (volumes 4, Devon, University of Exeter press 1996) p.64 4 Hitler and the collapse of Weimar p30 5 Richard Grunberger, Germany 1918-1945, (London B.T Batsford ltd1964) p85 6 Richard Grunberger, Germany 1918-1945, (London B.T Batsford ltd1964) p102 7 Ian Kershaw, Weimar: why did German democracy fail (London Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1990) p121 8 Ian Kershaw, Weimar: why did German democracy fail (London Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1990) P4. 9 Ian Kershaw, Weimar: why did German democracy fail (London Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1990) p6. 10 Ibid p21 11 Ibid p23 ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Germany 1920's and 1930's - Look at the weaknesses of the government and the ...

    Germany was hit badly as America recalled the loans to Germany negotiated under the Dawes Plan (1924). In 1932, there were six million unemployed in Germany. The chancellor, Bruning, seemed to be doing nothing to help the crisis and followed a policy of deflation.

  2. Weimar, 1918 - 1923

    P�hner (the former Munich police chief) and Frick (see above) were both Nazis, and were sent to occupy the police HQ with a band of SA troops. However, as soon as they arrived, von Lossow's men arrested them. It was obvious to Hitler and Ludendorff that the Putsch was not going to plan.

  1. Nazi Strengths and Opposition Weaknesses

    Failure To Co-operate With Each Other Hitler had another advantage in that because he had his own personal army he didn't have to deal with the opposition himself. His opposition however had to deal with both Hitler and their own opposition.

  2. How golden were the "Golden years"1924-29?

    In some ways I agree with this statement because this period was of significant development in culture. The arts became more popular among all the classes.

  1. What problems did the Weimar Republic face from 1919 to 1923, and why did ...

    It occupied the capital on the 13th of March. L�ttwitz, therefore, was the driving force behind the 1920 putsch. Its nominal leader, though, was Wolfgang Kapp, a 62-year-old East Prussian civil servant and fervent nationalist. At this point Noske, the defence minister, called upon the regular army to suppress the putsch.

  2. "The weakness of the Weimar republic was the main that allowed factor that allowed ...

    up by the allies after the first world war not very many people felt any reason to support or maintain it and little committed themselves to it. It had been targeted by both left wing and right wing groups in its early days in an attempt to overthrow it and

  1. Was the collapse of the Weimar Republic inevitable?

    However, it was easily abused initially be Hindenburg, but it was later used by Hitler to destroy the Weimar Republic. The weakness in the way that the constitution was drawn up also meant that there were frequent elections. A single party had to get 51% of the seats in the Reichstag in order to be able to pass laws successfully.

  2. Was The Weimar Republic Doomed From The Start?

    However, it was Hitler and his Nazi party that proved to be the most troublesome factor in Weimar's life. Hitler 'Used Article 48 and constitutional means to undermine Weimar, in a way self destructing itself.'

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work