• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the policy of appeasement justified?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Was the policy of appeasement justified? 500 words. Appeasement was a policy utilised most famously by Great Britain from 1936-1938 against Germany. Appeasement is a diplomatic policy of making political or material concessions to a power in order to avoid a threatened conflict. British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain used this towards Nazi Germany. One one hand, Europe was still recovering from the Great Depression. By delaying Hitler from causing war, or stopping him altogether, Chamberlain could focus money on increasing social welfare rather than on the military, thus decreasing the amount of unemployed people. People were also converting to Pacifism- they would welcome anything as long as another war didn?t break out, as they still had the thoughts of the First World War in their head. ...read more.


People in Britain were feeling more sympathetic to Germany, as they felt that the treaty of Versailles had been too harsh.Britain also couldn?t be sure of success if she went to war at the time of appeasement. Britain had no allies in the Austrian region, and some of her colonies also refused to help. The USA became isolationist, and France was in an unstable situation. The League of Nations had proven itself to be ineffective at enforcing decisions. Britain was militarily weak- it had majorly disarmed in the 1920s. Britain?s Chiefs of Staff consistently warned Chamberlain that Britain was in no condition to start a war. ...read more.


On the other hand, appeasement is morally wrong. Giving in to Hitler?s demands when he was clearly doing questionable acts only served to prove to Hitler that Britain and France were weak, and thus gave him the confidence that he needed to go on to attack Poland. Also, appeasement failed in the end- World War 2 is proof of that. It allowed Hitler to grow stronger- allowing him to join with Austria in Anschluss on the 12th of March 1938 provided him with a strong army and more supplies. It also let the Germans ?slander? the Czechs. The lack of action from Britain and France also startled Stalin into signing the Pact of Steel on 22 May 1939 with Hitler, which could have ended up with Britain and France losing the War. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Was the Policy of Appeasement correct?

    Furthermore, before Hitler's election as chancellor, the 'Japanese invasion of Manchuria' occurred. Manchuria is a part of China so China decided to appeal to the League of Nations. They took one year to do a survey and then they asked Japan to leave.

  2. Examine the main factors which led British Governments to follow a policy of 'appeasement' ...

    Britain, therefore, wanted to avoid committing herself to any single area and instead chose to grant concessions to avoid war unless British territory was directly threatened. Even though it was a violation of the Treaty of Versailles, after 1933 German rearmament went unchecked; however this was because most countries in

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work