• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the Treaty Of Versailles a Harsh Treaty?

Extracts from this document...


Was the Treaty Of Versailles a Harsh Treaty? When the peace armistice was signed on 11th November 1918, no plans had been made for a peace settlement so it was decided that one would be drawn up in the New Year. Representatives from Great Britain, France and USA were among those attending. Each had different ideas of how to treat Germany, and to what extent she would pay for the war. After the treaty of Versailles was agreed, the Germans were upset by the terms; as they felt it was too harsh. The treaty was harsh but could have been a lot worse. Who can say for sure whether the Treaty of Versailles was fair or not? The answer depends on your point of view. From the French perspective, the Germans deserved to give up everything in order to make amends for the destruction they caused in France. Therefore, the treaty wasn't punishing them enough. From where the American and British point of view, it seemed impossible to place the entire blame on one country, so the Clause 231, which stated Germany must except the blame for the war must have seemed quite harsh, but the treaty was a compromise - no one got everything they wanted, but more importantly, no one was completely short-changed, not even Germany. ...read more.


They had also forced the harsh peace treaty of Brest-Litovsk on Russia in 1918 without worries. It could seem that, in their rage about having all the guilt on them, the Germans set out to make the treaty look much worse than it really was. Clemenceau's wishes for revenge had only been halfway fulfilled. He had wanted Germany broken up into small states and to pay much more in compensation for the destruction and death which had taken place in France. Of course, one must consider that he had to negotiate with Wilson, who was much more concerned with a 'just peace' and self-determination. The treaty weakened Germany more than Wilson had wanted, but the American president had been forced to negotiate in a position of weakness and to make far-reaching concessions to his allies in order to secure a peace treaty at all. He tried to conceal his failure to the American public by condoning the peace treaty as a just punishment for a bad criminal. Wilson first of all wanted to make sure that Germany would not succumb to Bolshevism; in the long run, he wished for an integration of republican Germany into a liberal community of nations. ...read more.


All three British historians have different views as the sources written earlier may not have had as much information to research from. I don't believe that the Germans can blame every failure on the Treaty of Versailles, Germany's economy was weakened by the reparations and the army was limited and the Weimar republic was not as good as it should have been but Germany was still a large country and had the potential to become economically strong again. It depends from which point of view you look at it though the Germans will always say the treaty weakened them which it did, but was probably blow out of proportion, if you look at it from a British point of view it doesn't seem harsh enough and the Germans just wanted something to complain about. If the German government had not been so insecure and ineffective Germany may have been able to re-build itself a lot quicker. In the short run, the treaty significantly weakened Germany and gave the victors economic benefits and more power. In the long run, however, nothing spoke against a German recovery at least in economics. After the ?? ?? ?? ?? Minh Pritchard ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was The Treaty Of Versailles Justified?

    5 star(s)

    Also in 1918 the Germans were extremely harsh at the treaty of Brest-Litovsk and ignored Wilson's fourteen points during that treaty. Another complaint was that the Germans were made to pay for the mistakes of their past rulers, the Kaiser and his Government, but the Kaiser had fled to Holland

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Was the treaty of Versailles too harsh on Germany?

    4 star(s)

    England wanted Germany to be punished but not so severely. England also lost men but thought that the treaty of Versailles could bring problems for the future. The USA wanted the treaty to be softer, they thought the treaty was too harsh and would cause a future war in years to come.

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    In this, Hitler learned many things and even was given special training at the University of Munich where he attended political philosophy classes. These classes may be where he began to take keen interest in German expanse. In 1919, Hitler was investigating a fifty-four member group which was called the German's Worker's Party.

  2. Explain the different aims of the three leaders, Clemenceau, Lloyd-George, and Wilson at the ...

    by common action of international obligations..."12 This too was another of the League's aims: they wanted to enforce disarmament so that there would be less of a threat of military attacks against any nation. In the situation where one state attacked another, the League was established so that its' members could effectively and collectively restrain the offender.

  1. How fair was the treaty of Versailles?

    In my opinion it would have been better for Germany if it had some colonies to help some more income, to help pay off the war debt. As a result of the territorial changes Germany lost 13.5% of her land and 12.5% of her population.

  2. To what extent was the Treaty of Versailles justifiable?

    was Britain who had the largest Empire in the world and to achieve this massive feat, their international policy must have been excellent to keep the Empire under control. The quote is useful as it shows the beliefs in this time and also the arrogance which the British showed when


    Furthermore, there was an additional clause (231) that the Germans felt they were again forced to accept. The 'War Guilt' clause meant the Germans had to agree to starting the whole war (of which they did not believe) therefore it provided the support for The Big Three' (Wilson, Clemenceau and Lloyd George)

  2. how fair was the treaty of versailles

    Naval and Military Clauses In this section I will briefly analyse the points included in the military clauses and whether they are fair or unfair. The German army was cut to about 100,000 men. I think this is fair as it has reduced Germany's ability to fight so they will not start another war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work