• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the Treaty of Versailles fair?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Transfer-Encoding: chunked Was the Treaty of Versailles in 1919 fair? The treaty of Versailles was the peace treaty signed by Germany at the end of the First World War, some historians would say that the treaty was fair and that Germany got what they deserved but others would argue that it was far too harsh on Germany, and contributed to starting the Second World War. In some ways the Treaty of Versailles was fair; it punished Germany for their actions in the First World War. It also forced Germany to recognise that they were wrong to have started the war, and they were the ones to blame, as well as preventing a further war, temporarily as we know today. The reparations Germany were made to pay, £6 billion, they helped to rebuild the things that Germany had destroyed in the war, and made Germany’s economy struggle without completely destroying it. ...read more.

Middle

On the other hand, the treaty was unfair towards Germany because of many things. Firstly, the reparations at the time were huge, unseen amounts of money and not only did the Treaty of Versailles demand this amount but it also removed Germany?s main source of income, the Rhineland. The Rhineland was huge for Germany for two reasons, one, it was a pathway between Germany and western Europe ? used effectively in the war. Secondly, all the manufacturing facilities and crops for farming were based there. Since this was Germany?s main source of income, they had a huge economic crisis on their hand. Also, the treaty was unfair because it reduced Germany?s military presence by restricting Germany to have up to 100,000 men and 6 battleships ? nothing else. ...read more.

Conclusion

Obviously, the Chinese rejected these demands saying there was no reason for them to lose it and as a compromise, Japan claimed some former German colonies in the Pacific but there was no racial clause. This upset China as Japan provided soldiers for Germany but still collected territory. By the end of the treaty, neither country was satisfied by the outcome, Britain apparently questioned the decision due to the fact that the east of the world was considered unimportant ? it felt that leaving out of these countries would be in their best interests. In my opinion, the Treaty of Versailles was a strong idea and followed up successfully however I feel that it would have been better if there were neutral representatives moderating the demands and clauses in the treaty. It rejected equality claims and the ?big three? ignored relatively unimportant countries. To conclude, I think the Treaty of Versailles was unfair. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    Of course there would be death and destruction that is what happens in war. Another point is that the Germans lost the most soldiers, this again shows that the soldiers were very determined to win the war, as more of them risked their lives.

  2. How fair was the treaty of Versailles?

    France wanted the Rhineland to be a separate country which would form a barrier between France and Germany, if another war broke out it would be more likely to take place on German soil rather then French. However Wilson and George disagreed in saying that it would be a big

  1. How Far Was The Treaty Of Versailles Fair?

    Allied troops were allowed to occupy the West Bank for 15 years but despite this they were withdrawn by 1930 and reoccupied by German troops in 1936. France gained Saar, which was a coal mining area on the Franco - German border.

  2. how fair was the treaty of versailles

    Eupen and Malmedy were awarded to Belgium. This is also a fair point as Germany after losing the war was going to lose land. It has also gone to a country which was affected by the war when Germany travelled through Belgium to get to France.

  1. How fair was the Treaty of Versailles?

    It was also forced to demilitarise the Rhineland. This was mainly a result of French determination to secure some form of security against any future German invasion. Germany lost 13% of its territory and 12% of its total population, which consisted of about 25000 square miles and 7million people respectively.

  2. Treaty of Versailles, was it fair?

    But what if, for instance, the treaty had been made up of only Wilson's ideas? First of all, Clemenceau and Lloyd-George would probably be furious, since they didn't like the idea of self-determination and the French wanted revenge. Secondly, Germany might have been left too strong, and another war might have broken out even sooner.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work