• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the Treaty of Versailles fair?

Extracts from this document...


Transfer-Encoding: chunked Was the Treaty of Versailles in 1919 fair? The treaty of Versailles was the peace treaty signed by Germany at the end of the First World War, some historians would say that the treaty was fair and that Germany got what they deserved but others would argue that it was far too harsh on Germany, and contributed to starting the Second World War. In some ways the Treaty of Versailles was fair; it punished Germany for their actions in the First World War. It also forced Germany to recognise that they were wrong to have started the war, and they were the ones to blame, as well as preventing a further war, temporarily as we know today. The reparations Germany were made to pay, £6 billion, they helped to rebuild the things that Germany had destroyed in the war, and made Germany’s economy struggle without completely destroying it. ...read more.


On the other hand, the treaty was unfair towards Germany because of many things. Firstly, the reparations at the time were huge, unseen amounts of money and not only did the Treaty of Versailles demand this amount but it also removed Germany?s main source of income, the Rhineland. The Rhineland was huge for Germany for two reasons, one, it was a pathway between Germany and western Europe ? used effectively in the war. Secondly, all the manufacturing facilities and crops for farming were based there. Since this was Germany?s main source of income, they had a huge economic crisis on their hand. Also, the treaty was unfair because it reduced Germany?s military presence by restricting Germany to have up to 100,000 men and 6 battleships ? nothing else. ...read more.


Obviously, the Chinese rejected these demands saying there was no reason for them to lose it and as a compromise, Japan claimed some former German colonies in the Pacific but there was no racial clause. This upset China as Japan provided soldiers for Germany but still collected territory. By the end of the treaty, neither country was satisfied by the outcome, Britain apparently questioned the decision due to the fact that the east of the world was considered unimportant ? it felt that leaving out of these countries would be in their best interests. In my opinion, the Treaty of Versailles was a strong idea and followed up successfully however I feel that it would have been better if there were neutral representatives moderating the demands and clauses in the treaty. It rejected equality claims and the ?big three? ignored relatively unimportant countries. To conclude, I think the Treaty of Versailles was unfair. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. How Far Was The Treaty Of Versailles Fair?

    George did not like the treaty overall; he himself thought that there would be another war in 25 years. He was glad with the reduced German navy though; he thought that Britain could continue to "rule the waves". And of course he was glad that Britain had gained some colonies; their empire was expanding.

  2. How fair was the treaty of Versailles?

    mistake as in future Germany would demand revenge for such a great loss of land. Eventually Clemenceau then gave way by pressure from Wilson and George and agreed on a compromise that it would be occupied by French Troops for 15 years and no German soldier is allowed to enter the Rhineland.

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    down on Germany saying that they were the ones who had started the war. The financial reparations would be paid but the guilt would last forever, even now when people take about the First World War they blame Germany for starting it.

  2. How fair was the Treaty of Versailles?

    However, although territorial looses appear significant, they pale in comparison to Austria, and Germany was not invaded or divided as it was after the Second World War. Germany also lost its colonies to League of Nation mandates, which were to rule them until they were fit for independence.

  1. how fair was the treaty of versailles

    Georges Clemenceau on the other hand had ideas of his own. He wanted revenge for what Germany did and wanted them to pay reparations, give up land and be ruined by being broken up into states. Woodrow Wilson the President of the USA also had ideas of his own by

  2. Treaty of Versailles, was it fair?

    -Although the army was reduced, the generals were still there, and ready to rebuild. Isn't it hypocritical of Germany to complain and say they were tricked, when they had only taken the Fourteen Points seriously once they'd been beaten? -They had also forced the harsh peace treaty of Brest-Litovsk on Russia in 1918 without worries.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work