• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the 'Treaty of Versailles' fair on Germany?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Was the 'Treaty of Versailles' fair on Germany? 'The Treaty of Versailles' was the peace settlement that ended World War One in 1918. The treaty itself was actually signed on the 28th June 1919 at the former palace of Versailles, just outside Paris, by Germany and the Allies. The treaty was a compromise between the countries, trying to satisfy each demand - but was it overall fair to Germany? Germany was affected considerably by the terms of the Treaty, both in material and image. Firstly, she was forced to accept full responsibility for the war; establishing a foreground for a huge reparations bill. As it was decided that the entire war had been the fault of Germany and Germany alone, much to the outrage of the German citizens, she was expected to pay reparations to the countries affected; the Allies - to provide money to account for damaged land, compensation, etc. Two more terms from Versailles that largely affected Germany were the loss of land and army; around 10% of German land was taken away, including all overseas colonies, resulting in the loss ...read more.

Middle

It was also felt that the terms on Germany's military was very unfair; they would have perhaps accepted their forces being lowered by a percentage, but forcing them to cut down to just 100,000 men, etc., was regarded as ridiculous; how would they defend themselves if, for example, the communists attacked? What outraged the Germans further is that, unlike in 'Wilson's Fourteen Points', the Allies and other countries were not put under the same 'disability' (the Allies, etc., did not have to reduce their military). Therefore, it could be argued that Germany's objections were justified; the reparations demanded were far too high, finally being fixed at �6,600 million - �660 billion in modern rates - in 1921. Soon, people in Germany had to pay almost double for necessities such as food. In some places within the country people actually died of starvation, and often the only Germans living well would be the farmers, who provisioned their own food and sold or traded it. A source tells of incidents in which people who carried money in baskets would rather throw out the money than the basket. ...read more.

Conclusion

the Russian population and economy; there was evidence showing that Britain and France would have received equally harsh treaties had the outcome of the war been in Germany's favour. So, what is the closing verdict; was this treaty fair on Germany and her people, or was it demanding too much? The final treaty had attempted to satisfy each prevailing country's demands; France (French Premier, Clemenceau) was at the source of the 'harshness' within the agreement, seeking vengeance for the dire loss of life and land it had suffered during the war, Britain (Prime Minister, David Llyos George) wanted to punish the Germans but not to the same degree as the French, whilst America (President Woodrow Wilson) originally wished for a more peaceful solution, but ultimately isolated herself from the Allies, regarding the entire issue with far less concern. Conclusively, the treaty set upon Germany was very demanding and unfair to the many citizens of the country who had been against the war or not part of it; however, the agreement could have been worse, much worse in comparison if contrasted with German issued treaties. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was The Treaty Of Versailles Justified?

    5 star(s)

    Not all of the Allies were against Germany in this manner. Woodrow Wilson had a different idea of what the settlement should be, which he called the 14 points. These were more lenient than what Britain and France wanted, and Wilson believed they were more oriented to preserving the peace and status quo in Europe.

  2. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    After the War, Hitler found a job as a prison guard sixty miles north from Munich. The job was boring, but it provided him with security, food, shelter, and something to do. When the job ended, Hitler went back to Munich, where he was offered a more challenging job due

  1. Was the Treaty of Versailles unfair to Germany?

    I think that the Treaty of Versailles in many ways was very unfair to Germany, all the money they were expected to pay which would eventually cripple the country.

  2. How justified were the German objections to the Versailles Treaty?

    She lost 45 million of her population and the Bolsheviks were ordered to pay three billion roubles - more than they could possibly afford. Russia also lost a lot of its manufacturing capacity, almost a fifth of its total industrial output.

  1. How fair was the treaty of Versailles?

    It is fair for the allies as this makes it harder for Germany to pay back the reparations and it will stay that way for a long time. However for Germany it is unfair because it needs aid to help the nation survive and to pay off the reparations.

  2. How Far Was The Treaty Of Versailles Fair?

    France was also glad that Rhineland had been demilitarized, even though they did not gain Rhineland itself as they had hoped. No German forces were allowed to occupy any part of the area - this then meant that Germany could not launch any invasion upon France, and if they were

  1. how fair was the treaty of versailles

    North Schleswig was voted to return to Denmark. This again is a fair point as it was once a part of Denmark and in returning to Denmark it agrees with Wilson's point of self determination. It is land which was lost in 1863 and has been fairly returned to Denmark by voting.

  2. WHY WAS GERMANY SO DISCONTENTED WITH THE TREATY OF VERSAILLES

    of which was economically rewarding for Germany in past times. (To state the statistics, Germany lost 10% of its territory, 13% of its economic producing industries, 10% of is population and about 40% of all its natural resources). Eupen-Malmedy was given to Belgium, Alsace-Lorraine (the extremely successful industry)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work