• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the Treaty of Versailles Just?

Extracts from this document...


Was the Treaty of Versailles Just? By Richard Ward wattsvilleblues@hotmail.com Following the Armistice of November 1918, the Paris Peace Conference at Versailles brought together the Allied powers to decide upon the finer points of the agreement set out at the Armistice. Each representative had different priorities and these conflicted at times, making the acquisition of a peace settlement all the more difficult. Some aimed to simply punish Germany for starting the war, others set out to cripple Germany to such an extent that he could never present a threat to the surrounding countries. Some misguided representatives went to Versailles with the belief that it was purely a way of rewarding the Allied countries for winning the war. The objective of Versailles was, in fact, none of these. The aim of Versailles was to establish a workable and just treaty that would ensure lasting peace in Europe. The three major powers at Versailles were the USA (Wilson), Great Britain (Lloyd George) and France (Clemenceau). At the beginning of Versailles, Italy considered itself a major player. This misconception was put to rest as soon as the big three told the Italians that Fiume would not be made a part of Italy. The three countries each felt differently about what should be done to Germany, and their representatives were obliged to demonstrate their country's feelings as well as negotiating a workable treaty. ...read more.


The feeling was very much that Germany had something better to do than re-starting a war that they were not going to win easily: Germany needed re-building and restructuring. This desire to rebuild was not helped by the loss of land or the 'crippling' reparations. If Germany was going to rebuild, being excluded from the League of Nations was not going to help. It needed to integrate itself with the other nations, not be isolated. Ask a German what he thought the future held, and he would reply that Germany had no future. What Germany failed to remember was that he had signed the Armistice agreement, even if his arms were tied behind his back. The Armistice agreement had comprised of Wilson's fourteen points, reparations and 'any other things'. Germany knowingly disregarded the second and third points. When he was presented with the treaty of Versailles, though, he had little choice apart from to sign it without argument. After all, there was little he could do about it. The British, French and Americans were poised on the edge of the Rhineland, ready to cross into Germany should the need arise. The treaty was signed on June 28th 1919; it can be paraphrased into four main points: i. A League of Nations to be set up in order to prevent any future repetition of war (Germany excluded). ...read more.


That was not good enough for the sceptics. Reparations were not satisfactory (i.e. economic collapse was not guaranteed) and this incensed the nation that hoped Versailles would solve all the problems caused by the Germans during the Great War. France felt bitter and cheated by not only Versailles but also by the man that had promised everything and delivered very little. It could be argued that France and Germany both thought the same about Versailles, but for reasons that were totally polarised. The Americans, as previously mentioned, were generally apathetic. The Great War had not affected them to such an extent that it would make them care about what happened in Europe. After all, the Americans had only joined the war in late 1917 and missed out on prolonged spells in the trenches of the Western Front. Perhaps if the USA had joined the war earlier on, Wilson's ideals of peace and appeasement would have been quashed. It would also have led the American people to care what happened in Europe. The only thing the Americans thought about Versailles was how the USA had got itself into it. Wilson, however, thought the Treaty rather harsh. Britain was the only country that got anything of worth out of Versailles, namely protection from the German Navy and a few colonies in East Africa. In response to the question 'Was the Treaty of Versailles Just?', the answer depends wholly upon who is asked, as each country held different opinions. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    At the end of 1942, defeat against Hitler brought the war to a turning point. Hitler turned away from the reality of the situation, only listening to positive reports, which were given to him by his personal secretary. Germany was facing a desperate situation because they were not receiving no useful help from her weakening ally Mussolini.

  2. Summary of John Maynard Keynes' "The Economic Consequences of the Peace".

    Keynes then reminds the reader some of the problems; the production in Europe has decreased 30%. Before the war, Germany produced 85% of food consumed by its population, the fertility of the soil has now diminished by 40% and food stock diminished by 55%.

  1. Explain the different aims of the three leaders, Clemenceau, Lloyd-George, and Wilson at the ...

    the Council..."11 This was designed to offer collective security and to avoid any further large conflicts, by intimidating an aggressor with the strength of the League's members. Article 8 was also introduced to disarm nations and prevent war- "disarmament to the lowest point consistent with national safety and the enforcement

  2. To what extent was the Treaty of Versailles justifiable?

    The treaty itself to the revisionist historians were unjustifiable which itself was a view that was dominant throughout the 1960�s and the view held on to many people which made it seem like a chimera where a view that was believed for so long that it had to be true.

  1. The Treaty of Versailles.

    Lloyd George needed money to pay for the damages in Britain. He needed to make the Germans pay reparations as that was what the British people wanted. This was actually the opposite feeling of the British people once the peace settlement was made.

  2. Has to much emphasis been placed on the negative aspects of pre-1914 Germany?

    Yet one must recognise that although the German condition after Bismarck was not helped by Wilhelm, and indeed all but collapsed, individual achievements of the nation as a whole fully deserve to be seen in their own right as positive aspects of a nation struggling for modernity.

  1. The Allies punished Germany in the Treaty of Versailles because of the pressure exerted ...

    Germany hated the Treaty of Versailles not for one particular reason but for a series of interlinked reasons. The loss of territory was obviously a huge blow to Germany, as they had lost 12.5% of their population, but there were other reasons that caused Germany to feel angry towards the Allies.

  2. Explain how the Treaty of Versailles created problems for Germany between 1919-24.

    There was bitter street fighting for the next 3 days. The Separacist's revolution failed and Ebert held elections for his parliament. The new German republic was named the Weinmar Republic. In March 1919 the Weinmar Republic was faced with violence when the communists organized strikes in Berlin in another attempt to seize power.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work