• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was The Treaty Of Versailles Just?

Extracts from this document...


Ben Cocoracchio Was The Treaty Of Versailles Just? The treaty of Versailles was a peace treaty between the allies and Germany, signed 28 June 1919. It established the league of nations. Germany surrendered Alsace-Lorraine to France, and large areas in the East to Poland, and made smaller cessions Czechoslovakia, Lithuania, Belgium and Denmark. The Rhineland was demilitarised, German rearmament was restricted, and Germany agreed to pay reparations for war damage. The treaty was never ratified by the USA, which made a separate peace with Germany and Austria in 1921. The leaders of Britain (Lloyd George), France (Clemenceau) and the USA (Wilson) all arrived in Paris in June 1919 to write up a treaty, they were under pressure to deal with Germany severely. France and Britain both believed strongly that Germany was responsible for the war and should be punished. There was also a strong belief that Germany should pay for the damage and destruction caused by the war. Eric Geddes, a government minister used this to his advantage in an election. In his speech he said 'I have personally no doubt we will get everything that you can squeeze out of a lemon, and a bit more', meaning he would make Germany pay for everything, every weapon used, every bullet shot, ever bit of food ...read more.


No Anschluss with Austria was agreed on by all The Germans did not feel that the treaty was just, they thought that they were unfairly punished. They did not feel that they had started the war and did not think that they had lost either. They did not think that they had lost because they were still in a dangerous position, they only signed a cease-fire because they wanted to negotiate peace. Germany were horrified with disarmament because now they were defenceless from any attack and felt that before signing the treaty they were in a position to still fight. Their army that had now been reduced to 100,000 men was one of their great prides but now it is gone. The loss of territory was a blow to both their economy and pride but what else was annoying was that while their territories were being taken away the British were increasing the Empires. Germany were further insulted as they had not been asked to join the league of nations. They did not feel they solely started the war so why should they pay for all the damage and the people had little food therefore would not be able to eat. ...read more.


with Britain and America, the Rhineland buffer state under French control and military costs under French control, also no total figure was fixed. France therefore generally feared what their future would be like if Germany recovered and due to Clemenceau had no grounds to withstand a German attack in the future. The general American opinion about the treaty was that they didn't really care, but if forced would probably say it was unjust. Wilson thought it was unjust because it treated Germany too harshly, even though he still wanted them to be punished. Wilson had put his faith in the league of Nations to improve Germany's position in the future but America had decided not to join the league because of isolationism. So generally America were to involved in trying to get themselves back to the position they were in, in 1917 to worry about European problems and any treaties connected with them. In my opinion the treaty was just. It dealt with Germany reasonably harshly and gave France a good chance to withstand any German attacks in the near future related to the bitterness from the war, yet gave Germany a chance to recover because of the reductions in the estimated sum of the reparations and satisfied Britain, as they got some of Germany's colonies. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Who was most pleased with the Treaty of Versailles. Woodrow Wilson or George Clemenceau?

    East Prussia was separated from Germany. Poland also gained half of Silesia. The League of Nations took control of Danzig, The Rhineland, the Saarland (rich in Iron ore) and Memel. Germany lost all of her overseas colonies. Britain gained Tanganyika in East Africa, part of Togoland and the Cameroons.

  2. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    On the top of the list were the Jews, followed by the Communists and all foreigners. To many Germans, these groups did seem like plausible excuses for their troubles. On November 8, 1923, five years after the Germany's defeat, Hitler chos!

  1. Explain the different aims of the three leaders, Clemenceau, Lloyd-George, and Wilson at the ...

    Most nations were also comprised of many minor ethnic groups, thus the aim of self determination was not always achieved, much to Wilson's disappointment. His aim of freedom on the seas was also compromised by the British, who again resumed the dominating naval force.

  2. The Allies punished Germany in the Treaty of Versailles because of the pressure exerted ...

    Also, the Rhineland became a demilitarised zone. This meant that no German troops were allowed into this area. B) The Allies punished Germany in the Treaty of Versailles because of the pressure exerted on Lloyd George, Clemenceau and Wilson by the civilians of the allied countries to deal severely with Germany.

  1. The League of Nations was formed after the First World War, during 1919 at ...

    The Japanese army continued to advance into Manchuria. By the end of 1931 the Japanese troops had control of the entire province of Manchuria which they renamed Manchukuo. The League of Nations was meant to keep the peace through 'collective security'. If persuasion did not work, the League could use economic sanctions or military sanctions against the attacker.

  2. Was the Treaty of Versailles Just?

    They wanted a hard, punishing agreement that would make Germany pay. Yet by the early 1920s, anti-German feelings had receded and the British became sympathetic to the German people. At Versailles, Lloyd George argued for a peace that would be 'stern, but not vindictive', as well as one that would protect British interests overseas.

  1. Questions on World War One.

    7. Note the domestic background to German policy: "Weltpolitik" represented in part a systematic attempt to mobilize the forces of conservatism in Germany. What Tirpitz called "this great overseas policy" was intended to silence internal criticism and rally support for the Kaiser and the Reich.

  2. "The treaty of Versailles represented neither a Wilson peace nor a Clemenceau peace, but ...

    The German peoples were, if not satisfied, then certainly resigned to accept these points, and it is sure that if they had been put in place the Germans would never had had the bitterness they did that pushed them to World War II.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work