• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the Versailles Settlement Unfair and simply based on Revenge?

Extracts from this document...


Was the Versailles Settlement Unfair and simply based on Revenge? The Versailles Settlement dealt with those countries that were defeated by the allies in the First World War. The country most affected was Germany, but Austria Hungary, Bulgaria, and Turkey were also included in the settlement. A question regarding Germany is whether or not the treaty was too harsh - unfair and only based on revenge. Three powers were involved in deciding the settlement- Britain, France and the USA. Lloyd George had the aim of disarming the defeated powers-especially weakening Germany and their navy, but he did feel that Britain should gain something for their war effort. Clemenceau had three things in mind at the settlement; Revenge for the loss of life, Compensation for the money spent during the war, and disarmament. ...read more.


If the answer is 'Yes', then it is made far easier to justify a harsh treaty. Germany had been responsible for a great loss of allied life, and also a huge loss in resources. Germany had settled two harsh treaties against France, including one after the Franco-Prussian war; this may make a harsh treaty more justifiable. Also, Germany had rejected Wilson's fourteen points, which justifies that the treaty be harsher than Wilson's points pushed for before the war. One could also say that Germany would have been harsh in their treaty if they had one the war. On the other side, if one decides that Germany was not souly to blame for the war, the treaty could be more justified as too harsh. Firstly, the treaty was a dictat, meaning that Germany was there, but had no say. ...read more.


Austria's army was reduced to 30,000, whilst Thrace and other territories were taken from it. Hungary, and Bulgaria both faced loss of territory and a limit on their military. Compared to the other countries, Turkey was relatively lucky in its loss, as it lost little land. Clemenceau was generally very happy with the settlement - he was compensated, he gained territory, and he found revenge in the greatly weakened Germany. Lloyd George was generally happy, as Germany had been weakened- especially the navy. Wilson was not very happy at the result, as he felt the treaty to be too harsh, but he did agree that Germany should lose Alsace-Lorraine. I feel that the other countries punished in the settlement were not treated too harshly, and that Germany was weakened beyond a necessary point, so I feel that the overall settlement was fair and decided under good intentions. Alexander Phillips 18/01/01 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was The Treaty Of Versailles Justified?

    5 star(s)

    A major complaint on behalf of the Germans was that the Reparations payments were extortionate and would cripple the German economy leaving ordinary men, women and children hungry. It was Germany though that had caused that damage and hence they should pay for the clearing up operation.

  2. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    This was not the case. By December of that year, it was clear that the German's were not going to take the Soviet Union in one single battle. The winter had come and the German's were not prepared to deal with the subzero temperatures. Hitler was forced to back down.

  1. To what extent was the Treaty of Versailles justifiable?

    But through historiography, we see that the justification of the treaty differs from each school of thought and the traditionalists, believed that the treaty was entirely justifiable and the revisionists believed that the treaty was totally unjustifiable. But one would have to believe that the treaty was justified at the

  2. Was the Treaty of Versailles unfair to Germany?

    The Germans totally resented the idea of losing Danzig, it was a major port and they wanted it for themselves. I think that it was fair that the Germans did lose land because it is all part of the settlement but I think that it is unfair that the country

  1. Versailles and Hyperinflation, Germany 1919-28.

    The shop keeping trade was booming! As soon as people were paid their daily salary, they would rush out to buy their essentials before the shop was sold out or prices went up. With most of Germany doing this, shop owners had money pouring in.

  2. The Treaty Of Versailles: Unfair?

    This caused great feelings of patriotism in people and this made them angry that they were no longer regarded as Germans. Germany was literally slaughtered by the Treaty of Versailles financially. They were made to pay �6.6 billion in reparations and goods, and had it not been changed under the

  1. Analyse the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Versailles Settlement.

    The Czarist Empire of Russia had already been transformed, and the Hapsburg Empire too collapsed. The German Empire became the Weimar Republic, a constitutional monarchy through the necessity-activated movements of the Socialists. Lees states that Paris as a venue for the Peace Conference seemed solely designed to heighten Anti-German sympathies.

  2. Treaty of Versailles, was it fair?

    loss of human life, it seems very unfair on Germany from the revenge hungry French who all the time were waiting for this possibility of wounding Germany deep and long lasting from the time Alsace and Lorraine were taken away from them during the unification of Germany.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work