• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the Versailles Settlement Unfair and simply based on Revenge?

Extracts from this document...


Was the Versailles Settlement Unfair and simply based on Revenge? The Versailles Settlement dealt with those countries that were defeated by the allies in the First World War. The country most affected was Germany, but Austria Hungary, Bulgaria, and Turkey were also included in the settlement. A question regarding Germany is whether or not the treaty was too harsh - unfair and only based on revenge. Three powers were involved in deciding the settlement- Britain, France and the USA. Lloyd George had the aim of disarming the defeated powers-especially weakening Germany and their navy, but he did feel that Britain should gain something for their war effort. Clemenceau had three things in mind at the settlement; Revenge for the loss of life, Compensation for the money spent during the war, and disarmament. ...read more.


If the answer is 'Yes', then it is made far easier to justify a harsh treaty. Germany had been responsible for a great loss of allied life, and also a huge loss in resources. Germany had settled two harsh treaties against France, including one after the Franco-Prussian war; this may make a harsh treaty more justifiable. Also, Germany had rejected Wilson's fourteen points, which justifies that the treaty be harsher than Wilson's points pushed for before the war. One could also say that Germany would have been harsh in their treaty if they had one the war. On the other side, if one decides that Germany was not souly to blame for the war, the treaty could be more justified as too harsh. Firstly, the treaty was a dictat, meaning that Germany was there, but had no say. ...read more.


Austria's army was reduced to 30,000, whilst Thrace and other territories were taken from it. Hungary, and Bulgaria both faced loss of territory and a limit on their military. Compared to the other countries, Turkey was relatively lucky in its loss, as it lost little land. Clemenceau was generally very happy with the settlement - he was compensated, he gained territory, and he found revenge in the greatly weakened Germany. Lloyd George was generally happy, as Germany had been weakened- especially the navy. Wilson was not very happy at the result, as he felt the treaty to be too harsh, but he did agree that Germany should lose Alsace-Lorraine. I feel that the other countries punished in the settlement were not treated too harshly, and that Germany was weakened beyond a necessary point, so I feel that the overall settlement was fair and decided under good intentions. Alexander Phillips 18/01/01 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Was the Treaty of Versailles unfair to Germany?

    The Germans totally resented the idea of losing Danzig, it was a major port and they wanted it for themselves. I think that it was fair that the Germans did lose land because it is all part of the settlement but I think that it is unfair that the country

  2. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    Having experienced the slow and bloody battles in the First World War, Hitler decided to use a new technique of waging war. He used Blitzkrieg, or lightning war in which airplanes would bomb, while being supported by large divisions of tanks.

  1. Versailles and Hyperinflation, Germany 1919-28.

    Lots of Germans became unemployed. People working in any kind of job other than food shop keeping or farming found it hard to make a living. This is because people didn't have money to buy anything else, other than food, so other trades were declining. Not everyone, however, was badly affected by the economic crisis.

  2. Analyse the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Versailles Settlement.

    The Czarist Empire of Russia had already been transformed, and the Hapsburg Empire too collapsed. The German Empire became the Weimar Republic, a constitutional monarchy through the necessity-activated movements of the Socialists. Lees states that Paris as a venue for the Peace Conference seemed solely designed to heighten Anti-German sympathies.

  1. The Treaty Of Versailles: Unfair?

    German industry so there were less jobs and employees to employ people. Germany had less coal and iron, which she could use. Trade, upon which Germany had formerly relied on, had been dissolved. Families were split up and those who had formerly considered themselves Germans were now classified as French or Polish.

  2. Treaty of Versailles, was it fair?

    This is because countries such as France probably knew that Germany could not possible pay out that kind of a sum like the one they demanded (30,000 million pounds) in a short amount of time, not even in a reasonably long one.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work