• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the War or the Period Prior to the War more to Blame for the (Russian) Revolution?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Was the War or the Period Prior to the War more to Blame for the Revolution? INTRODUCTION The period during the war was more to blame for the Russian Revolution than the period prior to the war for a number for reasons. The war acted as a catalyst for the Revolution. Problems that existed were intensified and others were added. These included short-term triggers, such as the Rasputin and his assignation, suspicions about the German Tsarina, but most importantly, Nicholas II was a useless Tsar. Not only did he lack intelligence, but also he was not forceful enough to maintain order within the Russian Empire. One of the problems during the war was the Tsar. Nicholas was hopeless. Although a loving father, he was a cruel man and always turned to violence against the opposition. He praised regiments that hung people who were out of order. He knew little about the people in his country. Then Tsar took over the running of the war and went to the war front, which was a huge mistake. ...read more.

Middle

Coal was not getting to the city because the railway had collapsed so the coal could not get to the city. The coal and industrial materials were short too so a lot of factories had to close down, meaning unemployment rates went up. The lack of coal meant that people were cold and hungry. Another reason to blame the war for the revolution was Rasputin. He played a big part of the causes of the revolution. The people of Russia didn't like him and more importantly didn't trust him. Rasputin was a peasant from Siberia. He came to Russia and soon made friends with the royal family. The Tsar and Tsarina believed that he healed their son. Soon, Rasputin was more important to the Tsar than the nobles and they became very jealous. This lowered the reputation of the Royal family. Prince Yusupov, a relation of the Tsar, didn't like Rasputin and wanted to get rid of him because of the damage he was doing. ...read more.

Conclusion

They were extremely rich with many houses. This was one of the first reasons why the revolution broke out. Another problem was economic problems in Russia. The government made matters worse. They borrowed money off other countries to try and improve the backward agricultural country. To pay off this debt, they had to raise taxes. This caused strikes within the workers because their wages were low. The government's only solution to this was to crush any disturbance. The Russo-Japanese war didn't help matters. At first the Tsar thought it was a good way for the government to get a better reputation but things didn't go so well. It was defeat after defeat for Russia. Russia fell deeper and deeper into Crisis and by 1905 a revolution broke out. CONCLUSION I think that the Period during the war was more to blame for the Revolution. The Tsar made big mistakes and the Russian Empire rapidly went into crisis during the war. Although the period prior to the war actually the starting point of the revolution, the war sped it up and intensified the problems that were already there. By Nathalie Verduystert ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. What were the causes of the Russian Revolution in March 1917?

    after some initial successes against the Austrians, the Russians were heavily defeated y the Germans. Over on million soldiers were killed, wounded or taken as prisoner by the end of 1914 and this number had risen to eight million by March 1917.

  2. Question the nature of Russian society in the early 20th Century. Was a revolution ...

    However he stopped introducing his reforms as he thought it may cause him to compromise his power. His greater allowance of speech caused the development of intelligentsia who felt betrayed, despairing of Tsardom as a form of change they turned to Revolution.

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    But in practice, it became clear that this Constituent Assembly could only be an obstacle and a rallying point for the counter-revolution. Here, the slow moving mechanism of parliamentary elections lagged far behind the swift current of revolution. The real attitude of the peasantry was revealed in the civil war, when the right Social Revolutionaries (SRs)

  2. History - USSR - The main reason for the February/March Revolution was The World ...

    Nicholas was the only one who had the power to make laws in Russia. Because there was no elected Parliament in Russia, local councils (zemstvos) had to look after important matters such as hospitals and schools. He dismissed the idea of electing a parliament in Russia when there were complaints.

  1. In spite of the Czar's decrees and declarations, Russia, by the beginning of the ...

    His scheme was a moderate one, based largely on Witte's earlier suggestions. Its essence was the creation of a prosperous and conservative element in the countryside composed of "the strong and the sober." On the whole, Stolypin succeeded with some improvements in the civic status of the peasantry, but did

  2. The First World War

    So liberal bourgeoisie thoughtlessly and hurriedly provoked 5 V.I.Lenin. "Complete Works".vol.22(p.218) revolutionary reaction to the present situation with the war and internal economic and politic crisis. This argument is supported by many historians who believe the Rasputin's murder was

  1. With what justification has the period 1928-1939 been called 'Russian industrial revolution'.

    Once collective farms were making enough food for themselves and enough to distribute to others, there became available superfluous workers to send to the cities/factories. There was however major problems involved with collectivisation mainly attributed to its lack of organisation and expert opinion. Uncertainty arose surrounding issues such as pay.

  2. No other figure in recent Russian history has received the amount of vilification and ...

    Three more daughters were to follow: Tatiana Nicholaievna born in 1897, Maria Nicholaievna born in 1899 and Anastasia Nicholaievna born in 1901. Loving as they were as parents, Nicholas and Alexandra were deeply concerned at their inability to provide an heir to the imperial throne.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work