• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the Weimar Government destined to fail?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Anna Baldes VCE 20th Century History, Essay 3 20/05/2007 VCE 20th Century History, Unit 1 Topic Question: Was Weimar Government destined to fail? 1918-33 Word count: 1 522 Politics in Germany between 1918 and 1933 was volatile, as the Weimar Government struggled to keep control. The democratic Weimar Republic was from its inception doomed to fail. Beginning its regime with signing a fiercely unpopular peace treaty, this did not just cause a great number of problems for the newly instated Government, but ensured the distrust of its people for the duration of its lifespan. It struggled with problem after problem trying to maintain its rule over a country that not only was severely inexperienced with democracy but whose leaders and other significant figures were from day one aiming to destroy Weimar and the very system it was based on in its entirety. The constant demand for the destruction of the Weimar system meant that a place for extremist groups and parties was always ensured in German society, placing it in a position where it was constantly at threat. Weimar could have never survived. As Kaiser Wilhelm II fled, a great change took hold of Germany, one which would set into place a system and way of life which could never have survived let alone thrived. ...read more.

Middle

This did not only cause great economic problems, by brutally hindering her production of goods and resources, the majority of which were previously exported for profit, but caused an unimaginable and embarrassing blow to the identity of the general German population, who were fundamentally nationalistic. Secondly, the Treaty placed another strain on the proud German identity by placing inconceivable restrictions on the German military, calling for the destruction of both the air force 2 The German Century, Michael Sturmer, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, p.110 3 Weimar Sympathiser, Hugo Preuss, Democrat, 1923 and navy, in their entirety, and limiting its army to a tiny 100,000 men. The final and most critical blow came in the form of a forced acceptance of fault for the war and agreement to pay, a firstly an unset amount of reparations to the victorious Allied powers. Never before had there been such a unanimous outcry by the public who still believed that they could have emerged victorious, fiercely unforced censorship laws, until now, keeping them na�ve to their losses. This embarrassment had to be blamed on someone; the military instantly denied responsibility, 'The German army was stabbed in the back. No blame is to be attached to the sound care of the army...It is perfectly clear on whom the blame rests.'4, placing the blame on the only other logic party, the Weimar Government. ...read more.

Conclusion

Their views were easily made public, the general blame of Weimar for losing the war rising from these powerful individuals, '...let them eat the broth they have prepared for us.'9 Adding to Weimar's threatened state was the constant presence of extremist parties, made possibly by the lack of public support for Weimar. The numerous uprisings which occurred during Weimar's reign created constant unrest and ensured instability. The most extreme of these came in the form of the Kapp Putsch, for the right and the Spartacist Uprising, for the left, in both casing entire German cities were captured and held only to flee and return power to Weimar, not when Weimar intervened but the opposing extremist party of Weimar's behalf. This further proved to the German people Weimar incapability, not to mention drew support for the strong capability of the extremist parties. In conclusion, Weimar's collapse was ensured from its formation. The survival of a democratic system lies with the support of the people. The support which Weimar 9 Supreme commander, General Ludendorff never had, the fundamental hate for Weimar not only rooted in the German peoples personality and history, but caused by the injustices of Versailles, the confusion surrounding the constitution and the extreme opposition which threatened Weimar from every angle. Weimar could have never survived. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Why did the Weimar Republic fail?

    in a way the Weimar Republic was doomed from the very beginning due to the way in which it ran. Nonetheless, it is hard to say that Hitler would have had the chance to abuse the system if other problems in Germany had not existed.

  2. What is the tradition of animosity between racial groups in Europe during the Twentieth ...

    by their asocial behaviour.", this free phasing of regulations gave the Nazis room to maneuvre and enabled them to get away with many different crimes against the Gypsies. Regulations implementing this decree, which were issued on April 4, 1938, specified that it was directed against "beggars, vagabonds (Gypsies)

  1. Did the Weimar Republic have a good beginning?

    Whilst Germans put up with Weimar, no one was prepared to do much to save it. In time all the groups I have mentioned turned from the Weimar Republic and looked to more extreme political solutions. This meant that as time went on, the Weimar Republic went from having majority support, to having little or no support.

  2. Why did the Weimar Republic Fail?

    Belgium, this was a huge sum of money to be paid and Germany could not afford it. France forced Germany reduce their armed forces, the air force was disbanded and the army was limited to 100,000 soldiers. This caused great humility to Germany as they could no longer defend itself against invasion.

  1. Was the threat to Weimar greater from the left or from the right?

    There were other minor revolts from the left-wingers like the Sailors and Soldiers protests in Kiel, Bremen, Berlin, Munich, etc., Berlin Spartacist rising, Later strikes in Ruhr, Disturbances in Saxony and Thuringia, Joining of USPD with KPD and the strikes in Hamburg.

  2. Was the Weimar constitution flawed?

    By breaking up the nation into smaller sections Preuss hoped than power would be given to regional and local governments. Therefore Germany would be transformed into a unitary state - the states, due to their separation would be more reliant upon the centre.

  1. To what extent was the Weimar constitution flawed?

    Following the end of the war it was difficult for the German people to adjust to not following one ruler and to govern the country by the democratic process. Throughout the Weimar period the people were unclear to whether it was the president or the chancellor of the Reichstag who was the ultimate source of authority.

  2. History Revision Notes. Key Topic 1: The Weimar Republic 1918-1933.

    The regular army was in no shape. So They turned to the Freikorps. The Freikorps were demobilised soldier, returning from war, who had refused to give their arms back. They were anti-communist and worked with the regular army. With the help of the Freikorps the Weimar government was able to put down the Spartacist uprisings in the early 1919.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work