• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was there a revolution in Germany in 1918?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

WAS THERE A REVOLUTION IN GERMANY IN 1918? Q. (1) Why can it be argued that the 'revolution from above' was not so revolutionary? Ans. The so-called revolution in Germany which toppled The Second Reich and Kaiser Wilhelm II and brought about a change in the structure of the regime in Germany in the form of the Weimar Republic was an important event in the history of the country. The revolution was lead primarily by Ebert, the SPD member. But the historians find it exceedingly difficult to place Ebert precisely in the picture amidst the confusion and rapid sequence of events that was taking place in Germany at that time. This is predominantly because of Ebert's dual role during the movement in toppling the existing regimes where at one instance he is seen supporting the interests of the workers (i.e., supporting the revolution from below) and on another instance he is seen helping to keep the interests and powers of the elite Junkers intact (i.e., supporting the revolution from above). However, we must keep in mind that Ebert was not the only character who brought about these events to happen in Germany during the time. The 'revolution from above' was first carried out in October 1918 when Prince Max was appointed as the head of the government which was for the first time an accountable to the Reichstag. Thus the liberalised constitution of the Second Reich was established. But it has also been argued that the revolution in Germany was initiated in September 1918 by Ludendorff and the Army High Command. ...read more.

Middle

changing sequence of events because his role in the revolution is not at all well defined because he supports the Junkers as well as the mass population. We may start our analysis of Ebert's character by emphasising on the fact that he was a person that believed in taking he middle path without going too far on any side of the road. He did believe in changes but also believed that radical changes through out the government were not at all necessary. He was also panicky and was terribly scared of a communist element dominating the revolution in Germany. He over-estimated the soviet style communist threat and made secret deals with General Groener to use the army to suppress them. He used the army and the Freikrops to crush the Soviet republic in Bavaria and the Spartacist revolt in Berlin which was named 'Bloody Week'. It was persuaded by the communists who criticised Ebert for his failure (or may we put it as incompatibility or unwillingness?) to bring about radical changes in the structure of the government. He also put restrictions on the Workers' Council. But we must also keep in mind that Ebert under estimated the threat from the right-wingers to the revolution. This action of Ebert outrages the Marxist historians like Arnold Brecht who claim that he was the slave of the bourgeoisie and a person who protected capitalism. The Western historians, however, claim that Ebert's suppressing of the communists was vital for the survival of the democratic government approaching in the form of the Weimar Republic. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Republican Government never tried to interfere within the army attempts to revive itself. The military limited to 10,000 volunteers, became an extremely professional unit based very much on the ethos of the Second Reich. The decision of not republicanising the army was mainly the outcome of the telephonic conversation between Ebert and General Groener on 9th November. We may conclude by quoting Heiber who says that the entire structure of the army remains the same and it does what it desires without any hindrance at all from the government. Q.(5) Write a paragraph summing up your opinion on whether we can call the events of 1918-19 Germany a revolution? Ans. The Second Reich in Germany was faced with stiff opposition from almost all the social classes of Germany and finally the masses did manage to topple the existing regime by pressurising the changes to occur at the helm of the government and the political structure. In the meantime Ebert, a leader of the Socialist Party (SPD) managed to win over massive amount of support by cleverly disguising his role on every occasion. It is not very clear that on which side he was but all the historians could figure out is that he was often changing ends but doing this very cunningly so that he kept in with the elites as well as with the workers community. Out of the smokes of confusion and chaos in Germany there developed a so-called revolution which acted rapidly to remove the existing regime and declare the birth of a new democratic state with the name of Weimar Republic which, according to some, was a democratic robe covering various features of the Second Reich. ARUNI MUKHERJEE 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Lenin's Role in History

    Lenin took over an empire that was breaking up, suffering from military defeat and in a state of economic and political crisis. He left a Soviet State which was asserting more control over what remained than the tsars had managed before him.

  2. Was There a Revolution In Germany Between 1918 and 1919?

    There wasn't the time for great social change to come about. Also the shift in power in the social system hadn't changed the class system was still very active with the industrialists still having control over the workers and the social divides being even more evident in the conditions that people lived in.

  1. Stalin Man or Monster

    fact that it wouldn't be a time to print the faults, just facts, of the Soviet Union. Source M is an extract from a biography published in Britain in 1974, at the height of the cold war. At the time there was complete distrust between the Capitalists (USA, Britain, and France)

  2. Stalin man or monster

    of Stalin "Stalin is unhappy at not being able to convince everyone, himself included, that he is greater than everyone else." This suggests that Stalin was incredibly insecure about anyone being better than he. This is proven in his actions during the Purges where he slaughtered people for no reason without any concrete evidence just because of suspicion.

  1. Was the October Revolution inevitable

    The prime reason for this was the emancipation of the Serfs in 1861 when they were given their own piece of land to be paid for with a loan to the government. For the emancipated serf, who was producing fruitful crops and benefiting financially from it, was able to purchase more land.

  2. Why was there a German revolution in 1918 and how far had it gone ...

    Riechstag didn't propose the laws. Legislature was initiated by a chosen, un-elected body. The Reichsrat had the veto on legislature passed by Reichstrag, giving it a very restricted amount of power. A system, which embodied such aspects, could not be deemed to be democratic. This lead to demands for reform/change largely from the working classes

  1. The Radical Phase: 1793-94

    It was not until after the September massacres, when 1200 prisoners were executed without trials, that Robespierre and his followers were able to justify their premise. They condemned the actions of the unruly mobs that caused the deaths of innocent Frenchmen and demanded that the Monarchy be abolished in order

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    (LCW, Vol. 28, p. 188.) 15th March 1919: "Complete and final victory on a world scale cannot be achieved in Russia alone; it can be achieved only when the proletariat is victorious in at least all the advanced countries, or, at all events, in some of the largest of the advanced countries.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work