• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was World War one inevitable?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

WAS WORLD WAR ONE INEVITABLE? Alex Nathan February 2002 There are many different views on why World War 1 started, and whether it was always going to happen. Some thought it was Germany's ambition that brought about the war, some thought that Austria's desire to crush Serbia started it, but a clear answer has never been found. World War 1 was called the war to end all wars. When the news came to the people of the countries involved in 1914, the majority seemed happy and excited that they were at war. The triple alliance (Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy) was at war with the triple entente (France, Russia and Britain). Before the war, Britain and Russia had tried to settle the rising tension in Europe with peaceful negotiations, but Kaiser Wilhelm and his Austria-Hungary alliance declined these offers. Germany gave Austria-Hungary the "blank cheque" or in other words the go-ahead to declare war on Serbia, and France gave Russia, who had signed a military agreement with Serbia, the go-ahead to defend the Serbs. This, adding to the assassination of Franz Ferdinand of Austria in Sarajevo on 28th June 1914, all combined to mark the start of the second biggest war in the last century. But the question is, was this war inevitable? This essay will argue that World War 1 was inevitable because of the tension between the Balkan countries and the great powers, as well as the alliance systems. ...read more.

Middle

Germany had France and Britain to contend with. Soon 90 per cent of Africa was under European rule, but Germany still felt hard done by, as they had got the least. The Germans were not as successful as Britain, France or Russia in using imperialism to gain respect back in Europe. Germany was left with a little of Africa and a few Pacific islands. This lead to German jealousy. Then there was the problem with the Balkans. The Balkan countries had defeated the Turks and led to the downfall of the Ottoman Empire and the Treaty of San Stefano in 1878. Austria was interested in the Balkans because it desperately wanted to expand its empire. The countries in the Austrian Empire had seen what the Balkan states had done to the Turks, and the Austrians were worried that they would have a rebellion on their hands. The Austrians also wanted Bulgaria free from Tsarist rule. Germany had given Austria more confidence in provoking Serbia by signing a military agreement with them. Germany said that they would back Austria whatever. Russia was interested in the Balkans too. They wanted a warm water port and to protect Serbia (who had the same basic orthodox religion as Russia) from Austria, stunting the Austrian expansion. Serbia wanted to kick Austria out of Bosnia and join up with the Bosnians. But the other Balkan countries all wanted to rule themselves and grab land from neighbouring countries. ...read more.

Conclusion

Source: I.Geiss (ed.), July 1914, London, 1967. Cited in The origins of the first and second World Wars - (Frank McDonough) But German generals and private companies wanted war. The companies because they would reap the profits, especially the ones that made weapons and other products useful in war-time situations. The officials wanted war because they thought; what is the point of having all this naval force and all these weapons if we don't use them? The war had started and Germany had invaded Belgium on route to France. Britain had to join in. So the first World War was started and it seemed it was always going to. In conclusion, this essay finds that there were too many troubles and conflicts growing in Europe at the time for there not to be a war of some sort. The war in the end turned out to be on a near-global scale with the USA sending in some troops in the last year. From the evidence I think that war was always going to happen, but could have been avoided on such a large scale. For example, if the Austro-Hungarian and German alliance had agreed to British and Russian ideas of peaceful discussion, the war could have turned out completely differently. It could have ended up a war between just Austria and Serbia, or just Russia and Germany, or many other combinations of events. So, this essay finds that, yes, World War 1 was inevitable, but not on a global scale. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. History essay why did world war one happen

    An example of this was when Austria-Hungary was a sprawling empire in central Europe. It was made up of people of different ethnic groups and each group had its own customs and language. Most of the groups wanted independence from Austria-Hungary.

  2. Was WWII Inevitable?

    In addition, he viewed the Soviet Union as standing in the way of the Nazi goal to acquire "lebensraum" (living space for Germans). American isolationism also played a decisive role in allowing WWII to happen. The American government had opposed intervention in European affairs since before World War I, seeking to avoid undesired expenditures on their part.

  1. How successful was Bismarckas Chancellor in his foreign policies between 1871-1890?

    One of those groups was the industrialists who wanted to have new sources and raw materials so that they could raise their production levels. New groups such as the German Colonial Union and the Society for German Colonisation were formed in 1882 and 1884 respectively as a way to show the government Germans' wills.

  2. Questions on World War One.

    respectively Results Cession of all Turkish territories west of the Enos-Midia line and all the Aegean Islands. Albania - independent Internal rifts between Balkan League - quarrel over the spoils of war. Significance : sowed the seeds of World War One?

  1. AMR essay

    The relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union eventually did ease up slightly. This started in 1952 when Nikita Kruschev paid a visit to America with talks of "peaceful coexistence" between the two countries8. At the time that he did this he had begun to see his ally China as more of an enemy than America was9.

  2. World War One

    three kilometres of ground is of much consequence, we should incur very heavy losses" and " our objective seems rather to kill as many Germans as possible with the least loss to ourselves" These various quotes all imply that British Forces main goal was to simply annihilate all German troops

  1. Did Serbia benefit from the Balkan Wars?

    Knowing the need for a quick and decisive victory, the members of the Balkan League instituted a courageous and costly series of offences directly into the teeth of the Turkish forces. The brunt of the fighting fell to the Bulgarians, whose primary theatre of operations fell southward into Thrace though their primary objective was to win a Bulgarian Macedonia.

  2. World War One Project

    However not all men died at the hands of an enemy?s weapon. Many where plagued by diseases which would gradually wear them down eventually killing them. These diseases were found in the frontline and some of them were Trench fever, Influenza, Trench Foot and Typhoid.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work