• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Were contemporaries correct in blaming Hitler for the Reichstag Fire?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Were contemporaries correct in blaming Hitler for the Reichstag Fire? In Germany, by the end of 1932, an election showed that the vote in favour of the Nazi party had fallen. Franz Von Papen (Chancellor in Germany at the time) and President Hindenburg were growing increasingly concerned about the Communist threat. Von Papen thought that if they appointed Hitler as Vice-Chancellor then he would support them. Hitler turned down the Vice-Chancellorship, demanding instead to be made Chancellor. Von Papen and Hindenburg assumed that it was possible to control Hitler and so on the 30th of January 1933, Hitler was sworn in. Immediately, Hitler persuaded Hindenburg and Von Papen to call an election in March, to which they agreed. On the 27th of February 1933, the Reichstag building was set on fire. A Dutch ex-Communist, Marinus van der Lubbe, was found shirtless inside the parliament building, stripped to the waist. It is still unknown exactly who carried out the fire, but Van der Lubbe was arrested and eventually executed for the crime, after claiming sole responsibility for the damage to the building. Hundreds of people flocked towards the building upon seeing it in flames. Hitler, and his henchmen Goering and Goebbels, soon arrived on the scene to investigate along with police, firemen and reporters. ...read more.

Middle

The Fire was used as an excuse to eradicate all opposition to Hitler. Goering was Head of the SA at the time, and so he indeed had the manpower to get the job done. Goebbels, as head of propaganda, had to ensure that Hitler won, as he would shoulder a lot of the blame if the Communists won the elections. Bullock also comments on the way in which he thinks the fire was started: by the use of a chemical preparation. The SA had been known to set fire to election posters used by other parties, and so it is possible they would have had the equipment, such as chemicals, to start the Fire. This source is very useful, as it suggests an alternative to the general idea that Hitler had knowledge of the Fire. Van der Lubbe admitted from the beginning that he was solely responsible for the burning of the Reichstag building. He never wavered in his story and was eventually executed for his crime. Below is his police statement. Van der Lubbe was an ex-Communist and a Dutchman, who had not been in the country very long. He had a history of lying and attempting to become famous, such as trying to swim the English Channel but backing out at the last minute, and also of making elaborate claims. ...read more.

Conclusion

As Van der Lubbe did indeed admit full responsibility, some people believe that he carried out the Fire alone. Although his motive is conceivable, it is highly unlikely that he acted alone. It would have been incredibly difficult for Van der Lubbe to get into the building, unless doors to such an important place were left open. In my opinion, I do not believe that the Fire was the fault of the Communists, but neither was it Hitler's doing. I agree with Alan Bullock that Goering and Goebbels, or possibly other leading Nazi members, planned the Fire without the prior knowledge of Hitler. Both men had motives. They wanted to see the Nazi party win the election to avoid blame from Hitler if the Communists gained more seats. I think that they captured Van der Lubbe, informed him of their plan and sent him and the SA into the building, via the underground tunnel. The SA had the keys as they were involved in guarding the Reichstag. Bundles of material were set on fire all over the building. When Hitler was informed of the Fire he was genuinely surprised, and saw a way to eliminate the 'Red Peril'. The Fire achieved its aim - the Nazis won more seats and Hitler eventually became the 'Fuhrer' of Germany. Danielle Howells GCSE History Coursework ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Stalin and Hitler: Differences and Similarities

    So I think the way the kept control shows more similarities than differences. E. Home front Life They used the same methods to control people, but though there are more differences. While Hitler thoughts of women were, that she has to stay at home, has to get a lot of

  2. The object of this coursework is to gather information and data, on how woman ...

    This image I have chosen as a source, as I feel that if it had been put into a newspaper or been shown to the public they would have been appalled at the treatment that the woman received. This may have helped their camping for the rights to vote and in pressuring the government in allowing them the vote.

  1. Reichstag Fire

    Source A and part of Source D sums up the events that surrounded the Reich Stag fire that broke out on 27th February, 1933. Q2. How far do these sources show that Van der Lubbe was responsible for the Reichstag fire?

  2. Adolf Hitler

    It was at this time that he developed his ideas on how Germany should be run. It's interesting to find out that 2 of Hitler's closest friends during that time were Jewish, he also admired Jewish art dealers, and Jewish operatic performers.

  1. Why did Roosevelt win the 1932 elections?

    Moreover he was the first governor in any state to use tax money in that way as he was the governor of New York. In 1921, sadly Roosevelt was infected with a disease called polio, which was an infectious disease that destroyed the motor neurons resulting with a consequent paralysis.

  2. Alexander Von Humboldt in Colombia

    respond�a bien la pregunta, era admitido de lo contrario ser�a rechazado con esto creando un efecto colateral ya previsto en el cierre de la c�tedra de qu�mica y la vida de Sinforoso hubiesen estado comprometidas, en ese mismo momento Humboldt intervino para proponer una prueba pr�ctica, el aula m�xima se

  1. Nazi Germany

    The Media, Censorship and Propaganda How did the Nazis control the media using censorship? The Nazis controlled the media rigorously; nothing was published, said or sold without Goebbels' permission. The obsession with something not "Goebbels-approved" getting to the people was such that in 1933 he organised a book-burning where students,

  2. Reichstag Fire

    However, Source C doesn't tell us when Goebbels wrote the diary entry or why Goebbels formed such a strong opinion so soon, and why he though it was the "last attempt for the communists to seize power", making this a possible exaggeration of the events, or maybe the information presented

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work