• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Were contemporaries correct in blaming Hitler for the Reichstag Fire?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Were contemporaries correct in blaming Hitler for the Reichstag Fire? In Germany, by the end of 1932, an election showed that the vote in favour of the Nazi party had fallen. Franz Von Papen (Chancellor in Germany at the time) and President Hindenburg were growing increasingly concerned about the Communist threat. Von Papen thought that if they appointed Hitler as Vice-Chancellor then he would support them. Hitler turned down the Vice-Chancellorship, demanding instead to be made Chancellor. Von Papen and Hindenburg assumed that it was possible to control Hitler and so on the 30th of January 1933, Hitler was sworn in. Immediately, Hitler persuaded Hindenburg and Von Papen to call an election in March, to which they agreed. On the 27th of February 1933, the Reichstag building was set on fire. A Dutch ex-Communist, Marinus van der Lubbe, was found shirtless inside the parliament building, stripped to the waist. It is still unknown exactly who carried out the fire, but Van der Lubbe was arrested and eventually executed for the crime, after claiming sole responsibility for the damage to the building. Hundreds of people flocked towards the building upon seeing it in flames. Hitler, and his henchmen Goering and Goebbels, soon arrived on the scene to investigate along with police, firemen and reporters. ...read more.

Middle

The Fire was used as an excuse to eradicate all opposition to Hitler. Goering was Head of the SA at the time, and so he indeed had the manpower to get the job done. Goebbels, as head of propaganda, had to ensure that Hitler won, as he would shoulder a lot of the blame if the Communists won the elections. Bullock also comments on the way in which he thinks the fire was started: by the use of a chemical preparation. The SA had been known to set fire to election posters used by other parties, and so it is possible they would have had the equipment, such as chemicals, to start the Fire. This source is very useful, as it suggests an alternative to the general idea that Hitler had knowledge of the Fire. Van der Lubbe admitted from the beginning that he was solely responsible for the burning of the Reichstag building. He never wavered in his story and was eventually executed for his crime. Below is his police statement. Van der Lubbe was an ex-Communist and a Dutchman, who had not been in the country very long. He had a history of lying and attempting to become famous, such as trying to swim the English Channel but backing out at the last minute, and also of making elaborate claims. ...read more.

Conclusion

As Van der Lubbe did indeed admit full responsibility, some people believe that he carried out the Fire alone. Although his motive is conceivable, it is highly unlikely that he acted alone. It would have been incredibly difficult for Van der Lubbe to get into the building, unless doors to such an important place were left open. In my opinion, I do not believe that the Fire was the fault of the Communists, but neither was it Hitler's doing. I agree with Alan Bullock that Goering and Goebbels, or possibly other leading Nazi members, planned the Fire without the prior knowledge of Hitler. Both men had motives. They wanted to see the Nazi party win the election to avoid blame from Hitler if the Communists gained more seats. I think that they captured Van der Lubbe, informed him of their plan and sent him and the SA into the building, via the underground tunnel. The SA had the keys as they were involved in guarding the Reichstag. Bundles of material were set on fire all over the building. When Hitler was informed of the Fire he was genuinely surprised, and saw a way to eliminate the 'Red Peril'. The Fire achieved its aim - the Nazis won more seats and Hitler eventually became the 'Fuhrer' of Germany. Danielle Howells GCSE History Coursework ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Stalin and Hitler: Differences and Similarities

    So I think the way the kept control shows more similarities than differences. E. Home front Life They used the same methods to control people, but though there are more differences. While Hitler thoughts of women were, that she has to stay at home, has to get a lot of

  2. Alexander Von Humboldt in Colombia

    La ayuda de Humboldt no termino ah�, despu�s Humboldt recupero la carta de Sinforoso devolvi�ndole la paz al sabio Mutis3. Este hecho refleja las ense�anzas que imparti� Humboldt en el conocimiento emp�rico de las ciencias naturales y m�s exactamente en el estudio de la geograf�a f�sica de la nueva Granada.

  1. Why did Roosevelt win the 1932 elections?

    have to do anything himself as the situation will resolve on its own. Another promise made by Roosevelt was simply 'hope' and a change for the future. Roosevelt has a lot of psychical experiences which is possibly is the reason as to why Roosevelt became president.

  2. Reichstag Fire

    made his decision to commit arson, wether it was planned a long time before hand or was spontaneous. This source could also not be that reliable because he could be lying or stretching the truth by saying "No one at all helped me."

  1. To what extent and why did Machiavelli’s views on politics and human nature in ...

    Whereas a ruler would be heralded a great ruler if he led his army in a bloody battle that cost many lives on both sides but defeated the enemy. In the first case the ruler was pious and in the second case the ruler set aside piety.

  2. Hitlers promise of a better future for German people was the most important reason ...

    This meant that many citizens, especially, the middle classes, had their real income and savings eroded and there was soon confrontation with the Allies about reparations payments. The Germans managed the first installment of 50 million in the summer of 1921 but by 1922 they started to fall behind and asked for postponement of payments.

  1. Nazi Germany

    School timetable in Nazi Germany 8.00 German (every day) 8.50 Geography, History or Singing (alternate days) 9.40 Race Studies and Ideology (every day) 10.25 Recess, Sports and Special Announcements (every day) 11.00 Domestic Science or Maths (alternate days) 12.10 Eugenics or Health Biology (alternate days 1.00-6.00 Sports Evenings Sex Education, Ideology or Domestic Science (One evening each)

  2. Reichstag Fire

    He described that Marinus Van der Lubbe who was guilty of causing the fire, had set fire to the Assembly Hall using a firelighter. He then rushed through the corridors with his burning shirt in his right hand. He was then overpowered by the officials inside the Reichstag building and taken for interrogation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work