• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Were contemporaries correct in regarding President Kennedy as the saviour of the Western World after the Cuban Missile Crisis?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Were contemporaries correct in regarding President Kennedy as the saviour of the Western World after the Cuban Missile Crisis? A large section of the American public believed that Kennedy had acted sensibly and responsibly to avoid nuclear conflict as they had been told a biased story. The American public had only been told what Kennedy wanted them to know. Khrushchev was made to look bad, whereas Kennedy came out of the Cuban missiles crisis looking strong and brave. He was seen to stand up to Khrushchev and win, which put him in a good light with American people. However, the Americans did not see all that was really happening. I think that Khrushchev played just as much of a part in resolving the crisis as Kennedy. ...read more.

Middle

I think that he could have been playing with and taunting Kennedy by making him feel the danger and by letting him know that the result of the situation was not just in Kennedy's hands. I think that Kennedy over reacted. He wanted everything to go his way and I do not think that he liked feeling out of control. This was Khrushchev's way of showing Kennedy who was in charge and I think that Kennedy blew the whole thing out of proportion and in doings so, made the situation more dangerous. Around half of Americans considered Kennedy to be a saviour, which was shown in the elections where 51% voted for Kennedy and 49% against. ...read more.

Conclusion

These sources tell you what happened without taking sides, and are the most reliable as they show Khrushchev and Kennedy for what they really are. I think that both Khrushchev and Kennedy played an equal part in resolving the missiles crisis. I do not consider Kennedy as being the saviour of the Western World as I feel that Khrushchev deserved credit as well. I think that both leaders were not very co-operative and that they both tried to make life more difficult for the other. However, at some points during the crisis I think that Kennedy was more to blame than Khrushchev as Kennedy him, which caused more trouble and made the situation worse. I think that Kennedy wanted to be known as a 'saviour', however his actions did not agree with this unreal image of himself. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1941-80 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1941-80 essays

  1. To what extent was Kennedy a great American President?

    useful because it is still a source that we could use to come to a balanced conclusion.. It has also been argued that he created the situation in Vietnam. "As President, Kennedy assumed a greater degree of personal control in foreign policy than any of his predecessors.

  2. Why is President John F Kennedy such a famous and controversial figure in history?

    The reliability of the source determines that the source may be an accurate to content assessment of Kennedy's actions and abilities to an extent. However the source may not be a full assessment due to limitations of the source. The writers of the source are both historians, it's a secondary source.

  1. To What Extent was Kennedy a Great American President.

    Cuba and sent another letter saying he would only dismantle the missiles on Cuba if they dismantled theirs in Turkey. Kennedy replied to the first letter accepting Khrushchev's first offer but ignored the second letter completely. Khrushchev did not say anything about the second letter and began to dismantle their missiles on Cuba.

  2. Cuban Missile Crisis Essay

    Kennedy made some important, and disastrous, changes to the original plan. The landing was now to take place in the Bay of Pigs, where there had been virtually no reconnaissance (photographs of coral reefs were mistaken for seaweed), and he refused to authorise a second US air strike, should it be requested.

  1. John F. Kennedy

    He went on frequent dates, and often with different girls each time.12 John was a very handsome man, and he was quite popular with the ladies, and not just the young ladies either.

  2. Personal Log : The Cuban Missile Crisis

    He does not sensationalise Kennedy's role in the Cuban Missile Crisis and sticks to his argument throughout. However, although Hersh's argument caused me to question my own view that it was President Kennedy who played the most crucial role in the ending of the missile crisis, I felt his arguments seemed slightly exaggerated.

  1. Cuban Missile Crisis

    Just after the American sugar trade with Cuba was stopped, Russia stepped in to buy Cuba's sugar and other exports. America's actions made Castro go into the side of Russia. Now with a communist country supporting Cuba which is only 50 miles away, President J F Kennedy decided to give the anti-Castro some support.

  2. Why was Kennedy remembered positively?

    However, Kennedy caught the economy from hitting rock-bottom just at the right time- he was lucky. This shows Kennedy in a positive light as he did an even better job that the current president, back then. Most people had a positive memory of Kennedy, as a result of writers and filmmakers.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work