• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Were Stalins purges a success?

Extracts from this document...


Were Stalin's Purges in the 1930's a success or a disaster? By 1929, Joseph Stalin had become the undisputed leader of one of the largest populations in the world. He achieved this through a combination of political scheming, the mistakes of his opponents and the ingenious way in which he built up his power base. Stalin had great plans, but in order to execute them, he needed power. It seemed there was only one way to keep Russia in order - to control the people to such an extent that they would be afraid to even think of opposing him. Stalin, like Tsar Nicolas II before him, had trouble keeping this vast country in order. Soon, the terror increased, as Stalin tried to keep control and the death count rose. ...read more.


He achieved that, but little else it seems. Stalin lost all support which was not forced, and had to retrain officers and workers, to replace the ones imprisoned or dead. By 1937, an estimated 18 million people had been purged, with little reasoning as to why. The cracks began to show, as Stalin wiped out more and more people, to stay in authority of an ever-shrinking public. Although these Purges were villainous, Stalin had some reasoning behind them. His aims were more concentrated on the long term, in which all his opponents were destroyed, and Stalin had complete control. However, Stalin appeared to focus on one area of improvement at a time, as although the Purges helped him gain control, they also stopped improvement in other areas, such as becoming stronger. ...read more.


Industrialisation also meant peasants were able to eat, as they were paid in food coupons, instead of real money. Though all Stalin's plans meant hard work for the Peasants, it was an easier way of life, and meant all communities lived and worked the same. Long term success' of the Purges are intertwined with the success of Collectivisation and Industrialisation, as it meant both could be achieved. For Stalin, it was also a huge help, as it meant a large proportion of the opposition were gone. This left the way clear to a supposedly brighter future, and new Russia. In conclusion, the Purges were seen as a failure as not only did the death toll reach around 18 million, just through Stalin's apparent insecurities but Russia was actually left weaker than before, with no army to lead them, and little food. As Stalin's grip on Russia became tighter, terror ruled the people. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. "Stalin was personally responsible for the Purges in Russia in the 1930s". Agree or ...

    those purged were total "unknowns" to him therefore he had no motive to get rid of them. A factor to suggest Stalin was not personally responsible for the purges is that he was merely continuing the brutal doctoral system installed under his predecessor Lenin.

  2. To what extent were Stalin's policies of collectivisation and industrialisation a success.

    The money in the end was spent on defence. In 1929 factories started working seven day a week and for religious people it made it hard to attend places of worship.

  1. Why Did Stalin Use Terror and Purges in Such a Comprehensive Way during the ...

    The 'guilty' were not allowed to appeal and could be swiftly shot. The death of Kirov started a fresh purge of the Party, with claims that Kirov's death had been organised by Trotskyites and Leftists. In this way, Stalin was paranoid, he was neither willing to share nor delegate power,

  2. How successful were Stalin's economic policies in the 1920s and 30s?

    collectivisation only meant that the peasants had signed a piece of paper, nothing solid had been achieved. In fact the whole of agriculture had moved backwards as resentful peasants proceeded to destroy equipment, farm buildings and crops as well as slaughtering and eating their livestock.

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    White atrocities provoked a violent backlash: "However, the massacres at Munich did reinforce the terrorist state of mind, and the atrocities committed at Ufa by Admiral Kolchak's troops, who burned Red prisoners alive, had lately enabled the Chekists to prevail against those Party members who hoped for a greater degree of humanity."

  2. Stalin and Purges

    Pictures of Stalin being a father figure were posted everywhere to teach children to love Stalin as much as others. Stalin needed to do this because he wanted to create unity between everyone in the country and he believed the country needed a single leader who they can all look up to.

  1. “Collectivisation was a political success but an economic failure and a human disaster” discuss.

    'It may be said with certainty that so long as there are kulaks, so long will there be sabotage of grain procurements.' Joseph Stalin Lenin has also said in his time that the kulaks are 'bloodsucking, vampires, robbers of the people'.

  2. Source related questions on Joseph Stalin

    Litvingee (Stalin's foreign secretary) was not actually murdered, but as the cartoon was prophecies for the future, it shows that David Lowe expected Litvingee to be murdered. As well as having Trotsky killed, many people in the USSR suspected him of killing his wife, although nobody was willing enough to come out in public with their thoughts.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work