• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Were Stalins purges a success?

Extracts from this document...


Were Stalin's Purges in the 1930's a success or a disaster? By 1929, Joseph Stalin had become the undisputed leader of one of the largest populations in the world. He achieved this through a combination of political scheming, the mistakes of his opponents and the ingenious way in which he built up his power base. Stalin had great plans, but in order to execute them, he needed power. It seemed there was only one way to keep Russia in order - to control the people to such an extent that they would be afraid to even think of opposing him. Stalin, like Tsar Nicolas II before him, had trouble keeping this vast country in order. Soon, the terror increased, as Stalin tried to keep control and the death count rose. ...read more.


He achieved that, but little else it seems. Stalin lost all support which was not forced, and had to retrain officers and workers, to replace the ones imprisoned or dead. By 1937, an estimated 18 million people had been purged, with little reasoning as to why. The cracks began to show, as Stalin wiped out more and more people, to stay in authority of an ever-shrinking public. Although these Purges were villainous, Stalin had some reasoning behind them. His aims were more concentrated on the long term, in which all his opponents were destroyed, and Stalin had complete control. However, Stalin appeared to focus on one area of improvement at a time, as although the Purges helped him gain control, they also stopped improvement in other areas, such as becoming stronger. ...read more.


Industrialisation also meant peasants were able to eat, as they were paid in food coupons, instead of real money. Though all Stalin's plans meant hard work for the Peasants, it was an easier way of life, and meant all communities lived and worked the same. Long term success' of the Purges are intertwined with the success of Collectivisation and Industrialisation, as it meant both could be achieved. For Stalin, it was also a huge help, as it meant a large proportion of the opposition were gone. This left the way clear to a supposedly brighter future, and new Russia. In conclusion, the Purges were seen as a failure as not only did the death toll reach around 18 million, just through Stalin's apparent insecurities but Russia was actually left weaker than before, with no army to lead them, and little food. As Stalin's grip on Russia became tighter, terror ruled the people. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. "Stalin was personally responsible for the Purges in Russia in the 1930s". Agree or ...

    Furthermore, the evidence for conviction was usually non-existent; it relied on the confessions extracted through brutal tactics such as torture and threats against family members. This may be seen to have been a good excuse to rid him of opposition, because the key 'show trails' where this unfairness took place

  2. To what extent were Stalin's policies of collectivisation and industrialisation a success.

    The money in the end was spent on defence. In 1929 factories started working seven day a week and for religious people it made it hard to attend places of worship.

  1. How successful were Stalin's economic policies in the 1920s and 30s?

    In order for Stalin to make significant changes in industry he needed a lot more workers in his cities. By collectivisation Stalin made more food and because the farms now state controlled more of that food was available to the workers in the cities at a faster rate and for much cheaper than before.

  2. “Collectivisation was a political success but an economic failure and a human disaster” discuss.

    If the state owned all the farms, then the well off peasants would no longer have any extra money than the peasants that were always down the lower end of the scale. Although it should be noted at this point that because of Kulak resistance many people were killed along

  1. Stalin and Purges

    Pictures of Stalin being a father figure were posted everywhere to teach children to love Stalin as much as others. Stalin needed to do this because he wanted to create unity between everyone in the country and he believed the country needed a single leader who they can all look up to.

  2. Source related questions on Joseph Stalin

    'One death is a tragedy; a million is just a statistic'. As a result of this quote, Stalin maybe trying to say that if he kills himself, it will be a tragedy. David Lowe may be referring to the prison as the loss of freedom fort the public of the USSR.

  1. Why and With What Success did Stalin Embark on an

    However this decision would obviously not encourage greater grain production. Effectively the realisation of this fact was a decision leading to collectivisation. With devastating understatement, Moshkov recalled, "The content and character of these changes were such that they had to be followed by the beginning of widespread social transformation in the countryside."

  2. Evaluation on the Effect of Stalin's Economic and Social Policies

    grow it and where to grow it, they also were going to take large amounts of harvest from them for very little pay. No one was more furious about this new policy, than the Kulaks. The Kulaks were a group of people, who when given land of their own when

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work