• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Were the artists of these two posters for of against Prohibition?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Sean B.C Question B Were the artists of these two posters for of against Prohibition? Sources C and D both give clear evidence that supports the idea the artists were for Prohibition. Source C shows us the artist was for Prohibition. We have evidence from the slogan at the top of the page which says "The poor mans club, the most expensive in the world to belong to". We know this could be true because it shows a man handing a pouch of money over to the barman, also in a circle at the bottom, a family starving and the mother saying "The poor mans club - it keeps its men and their families always poor". ...read more.

Middle

Overall, I think this artist was 100% behind the idea of Prohibition and thought it would definitely work. As well as source C, source D has some very similar and important evidence that shows the artist was for Prohibition. The first key things we see in this picture are two young children, which first show us the idea of family. We then see that they are skinny, ragged and they do not look to be in good health. Following on, there is an image of children standing outside the saloon entrance. The salon entrance looks dark, dirty, gloomy and generally not a nice place to be. All of this tells us, that there must be a link between the two children and this dark gloomy place. ...read more.

Conclusion

Just like source C, the poster shows us the affects that alcohol has on lives, except that source D does not contain as clear evidence as source C, which almost tells a whole story of that time. I think the artist of source D is definitely for Prohibition, just like the artist in source C. The two artists of the posters have both put a lot of thought into these pictures and what they are trying to say about Prohibition. Both artists show definite links between poverty and alcohol, they also show that saloons and bars were a major cause of children in families suffering, as we can see clearly in the bottom right corner of source C and in the main picture of source D. Overall, I think that the artists of these two posters were most definitely for Prohibition. . ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition bound to fail?

    The children are shown as poor and wearing old ragged up clothes. The caption 'Daddy's in there' is to show the innocence of the children and to gain sympathy for them and hatred for the dad who has abandoned his children and keeps drinking alcohol.

  2. b) Study Sources C and D Were the artists of these two posters for ...

    Source D shows a girl and small boy, standing outside a saloon door. They are looking fairly sad and alone, are wearing old clothes and have no adult looking after them. The background shows a saloon door, and behind the door, all is dark.

  1. History evacuation of children

    Spain had been involved in a war prior to World War Two were her industrial cities were targeted for air raids and bombings. The British Government were aware of this and believed that Germany would too target Britain's major industrial cities.

  2. Study sources C and D Were the artists of these two posters for ...

    The title is "daddies in there". And under the picture it says, "So are our shoes and cloths and stockings and food are in there too, and they'll never come out". This is saying that because the men are wasting all of their money on alcohol they won't have any money left to buy their kids.

  1. Were the artists of these two posters for or against prohibition?

    The fact that the mother and children are collapsed at an empty table shows that because of the man spending all of his money on alcohol they cannot afford to buy food and so are starving.

  2. Study sources C & D - Were the artists of these posters for or ...

    The bartender is seen as a stereotypical one because he is large, and appears to be German. This source shows that the bartender is taking in the money of the people and he is exploiting them and his till is also open, which shows that the bartender keeps collecting people's money.

  1. Study sources C and D - Were the artists of these two posters for ...

    This is trying to illustrate an evil of alcohol and try and get the viewer to see that alcohol is a harmful drink for the family. The artist has shown a very extreme situation and tried to gain the support of the public (viewer).

  2. The USA Was Prohibition bound To Fail?

    Patrons had to speak very quietly or 'easy' to get in so that they wouldn't be arrested hence the name. These places prospered as drinking alcohol became more fashionable and by 1928 there were at least 30,000 in New York.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work