• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Were The Important Changes To Public Health Made In The 19th Century Or In The 20th Century?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Were The Important Changes To Public Health Made In The 19th Century Or In The 20th Century? I think that the Nineteenth centaury made bigger and more important changes to Public Health then the Twentieth centaury did. In the twentieth centaury, the NHS was created which provided a free health care to everyone and technology improved dramatically so that complex operations can now take place, but I do not feel that this compares with the many discoveries of the nineteenth centaury. Edward Jenner developed the vaccine for smallpox at the end of the 18th centaury. By the 19th centaury, The vaccine became open to the public and then in 1852, the vaccine was made compulsory. This saved hundreds of the Public from the horrible Smallpox disease. ...read more.

Middle

Snow had discovered the cause of the dreaded cholera and pushed the government to supply clean water to everyone. This removed the terrible disease, cholera, that had been killing lots of the public. Chadwick also wrote a report about the living conditions and the health of the poor in both the cities and countryside's of England. He found that the average working class man in the rural town of Rutland were outliving the upper classes in Liverpool. The two men's reports shocked many and the government laid down it's first Public Health Act that enforced a clean up. Local authorities had to provide clean water, a Medical Officer of Health, a proper drainage system and a proper sewerage system. ...read more.

Conclusion

Many people died after surgery. Joseph Lister discovered antiseptics. Because of Joseph Lister antiseptics and Louis Pasteur's germ theory, people survived surgery without catching nasty infections that would have killed them. Public health isn't just about hygiene in the streets, but also the medicine and treatments available as well. One could argue that medicine and treatments were more advanced in the ninetieth century, but I still believe that all these discoveries and changes were more important to public health. Louis Pasteur discovery of germs and that they caused disease, the clean water that was supplied through out Britain thanks to the work of Edwin Chadwick and John Snow, James Simpson's anaesthetics, Florence Nightingales clean hospitals and Joseph Lister's Antiseptics all improved peoples chances of survival in hospitals and in surgery where it had previously been low are far more important to public health. ?? ?? ?? ?? Becky Morgan ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. How important was the role played by Edwin Chadwick in improving public health services ...

    Bazalgette realised that the population was forecast to grow so he made sure the sewers had a much higher capacity that was needed in the 1860s. I think that chance was an important factor in improving medicine as the timing of the 1848 Public Health Act was the result of the latest epidemic of cholera.

  2. How significant was James Simpsons role in solving the problem of surgery during the ...

    It was his willingness to explore the possibilities of the substance that established his career as a pioneer in the field of medicine. He began to use chloroform as an efficient and effective anaesthetic used to relieve labour pains during childbirth.

  1. Jack The Ripper - Law and Order in the late 19th century

    However improvements were still made as the number of arrests in 1879 went from 13,128 to 18,349 in 1884. The types of crime the police generally had to deal with included drunken brawls, petty theft and burglary. From 1857 to 1873 it was logged that most arrests were made for drunkenness and small theft.

  2. Did Police Work change dramatically in the 20th century?

    The other major idea was having different departments for different crime areas. This was another very successful change. There are now specialists for all sorts of crime including traffic police drugs department and C.I.D. Where as before there were a group of police officers that dealt with every crime that was present at that moment in time.

  1. Public health in Britain during the hundred years from 1850 to 1950

    After the major epidemic of 1832, there were further epidemics in 1848 and 1854. It was only until 1854, that Dr John Snow made a breakthrough in proving the link between cholera and water supply. Snow used meticulous research, observation, and house-to-house interviews to build up a detailed illustration of

  2. Is Bit Pit an accurate representation of work and life in mining communities in ...

    We went down the earlier root of the mine for a better understanding of mining life. Before we went down in the metal cage, we took the safety measures shown in source 7, though in the late 19th/early 20th century, the miners would not have had self rescuers or cap lamps.

  1. How important was the work of Edwin Chadwick in improving public health in the ...

    In this era, less people linked disease with religion, as most of them realised that they could prevent diseases by looking for cures. Scientists and doctors were challenging old theories more frequently and testing out new hypotheses and ideas. With this attitude, people can come to accept that general health improvements are really necessary.

  2. History of Medicine Revision Notes.

    medical research and ability [ax]that led to the discovery War and Government: The US and British government put large sums of money into mass-producing penicillin and without the governments, penicillin would NOT have saved as many lives. Obviously, the war played a factor BUT Howard Florey said they were not

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work