• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

were the paris peace settlements fair

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How Far Do You Agree That The Paris Peace Settlement Was Fair? To begin with I believe that the Paris Peace Settlement was meant to start as a fair peace settlement which was meant to follow the fourteen points as proposed by Woodrow Wilson, the American President at the time. He issued this plan in 1918. His fourteen points were on the basis that he wanted to form the League of Nations in which the main world powers would be involved in and disputes would be settled and an end to secret diplomacy would emerge, he was forced to make many concessions towards the British and the French, this allowed the British and the French to get greedy and start to take excess land and reparations. A vast amount of these reparations were forced to be paid by Germany, who had the responsibility of herself and the Allies relating to the outbreak of war. This is the War Guilt Clause; this was not taken well by Germany she but was forced into agreeing to it by the League of Nations. The treaty involved Germany losing approximately thirteen percent of her economic production capacity and about ten percent of its population. ...read more.

Middle

She lost Northern Macedonia to Yugoslavia, Dobruja to Romania and the Western Thrace to Greece. Turkey had lost the Western Thrace (link between Europe and Asia) to the Greek people. This was an area which turkey would not want to give up and did so only because they were threatened with force. Another factor was that the majority of the land that Turkey lost was given to either France or Britain as a mandate. This allowed them to control what was going on in those countries and more importantly the oil that was in those countries. This was due to the Treaty of Sevres and Lausanne. The Italians were upset that they did not get the land that they deserved as they felt that they were not getting the respect they deserved from the British and the French. The victorious nations did not reduce the size of their armies. This was unfair as all the defeated powers had their armies reduced. On the other hand the Paris Peace Settlements had sum justice in them. The size of every defeated powers army was reduced which would act as a way to restrict the amount of influence they had military wise. ...read more.

Conclusion

The formation of the League of Nations as proposed by Woodrow Wilson was a good plan. This would enable all the powers of the world to be able to put forward their concerns and requests thus causing the League of Nations to act upon these concerns and requests. The Paris Peace Settlements were balanced on different needs which allow different countries to have different settlements in respect to their situation. In conclusion I disagree that the Paris Peace Settlements were fair as the British and the French allowed themselves to take excess land. This meant that even some of the victorious nations felt they were not getting enough land as they deserve. This is shown as a few years later the victorious nations that believe they should have received more land start to take things into their own hands and take more land. I believe that too much land was taken off the defeated nations and this would cause them to be unsatisfied with the outcome of the settlements. This is shown as a few years after the defeated nations started to take some of their lost land back from the occupying countries. ?? ?? ?? ?? Deniz Hilmi 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    The Years of 1943 and 1944 saw several assassination attempts on Hitler's life. They all failed making his personal security tighter. As 1945 came around, Hitler was found in a bunker where he was planning his last efforts to stop the incoming forces of the Soviet Union, the United States, and the British.

  2. Were the Peace Settlements after World War One Justified?

    The Saar was to be controlled by the Allies for fifteen years and then a plebiscite was to be held. This was unfair because it was a significant blow to Germany's finance. On the other hand, Alsace-Lorraine was returned to France.

  1. How fair were the Paris Peace Treaties

    While the treaty of Versailles had Germany sign off only 12% of its people, 10 of its coal mines and pay reparations of (6.6 billion. If they had made Russia pay as hard the treaty of Versailles was not as harsh towards Germany and was fair towards them.

  2. The Treaties of Sevres and Lausanne

    All the powers were exhausted after a draining war that had lasted four years, much longer than most had anticipated. They were not only physically but also morally. The four years had cost the countries a great deal of money and supplies not to mention human lives.

  1. The Paris Peace Settlements

    Although the treaty was annulled by Germany's defeat, most of the lost territory was not recovered by Russia, which was embroiled in civil war until 1920.

  2. Treaty of Versailles, was it fair?

    into consideration. Although they felt they were humiliated in the way that they were not aloud to effectively participate in the council I think that is fair on them because of them starting the war, there for having the war guilt upon them (as many historians say they have)

  1. The year of 1919 had Europe's feet placed firmly on the ground. It was ...

    In 1882, Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy signed an alliance. They were recognized as the Central Powers. The alliance provided numerous problems strictly because the other powers found themselves at a disadvantage. If anything were to happen, Britain, France, and Russia found themselves to be weak if they were forced to fight separately.

  2. Why did international peace collapse in 1939?

    had invaded Poland without the assurance he received through the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact, which allowed him not to fight the war on two fronts and to take Poland without Soviet interference. Although it was Hitler?s actions, which led to war, many other factors were important in making the war happen,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work