• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

were the paris peace settlements fair

Extracts from this document...


How Far Do You Agree That The Paris Peace Settlement Was Fair? To begin with I believe that the Paris Peace Settlement was meant to start as a fair peace settlement which was meant to follow the fourteen points as proposed by Woodrow Wilson, the American President at the time. He issued this plan in 1918. His fourteen points were on the basis that he wanted to form the League of Nations in which the main world powers would be involved in and disputes would be settled and an end to secret diplomacy would emerge, he was forced to make many concessions towards the British and the French, this allowed the British and the French to get greedy and start to take excess land and reparations. A vast amount of these reparations were forced to be paid by Germany, who had the responsibility of herself and the Allies relating to the outbreak of war. This is the War Guilt Clause; this was not taken well by Germany she but was forced into agreeing to it by the League of Nations. The treaty involved Germany losing approximately thirteen percent of her economic production capacity and about ten percent of its population. ...read more.


She lost Northern Macedonia to Yugoslavia, Dobruja to Romania and the Western Thrace to Greece. Turkey had lost the Western Thrace (link between Europe and Asia) to the Greek people. This was an area which turkey would not want to give up and did so only because they were threatened with force. Another factor was that the majority of the land that Turkey lost was given to either France or Britain as a mandate. This allowed them to control what was going on in those countries and more importantly the oil that was in those countries. This was due to the Treaty of Sevres and Lausanne. The Italians were upset that they did not get the land that they deserved as they felt that they were not getting the respect they deserved from the British and the French. The victorious nations did not reduce the size of their armies. This was unfair as all the defeated powers had their armies reduced. On the other hand the Paris Peace Settlements had sum justice in them. The size of every defeated powers army was reduced which would act as a way to restrict the amount of influence they had military wise. ...read more.


The formation of the League of Nations as proposed by Woodrow Wilson was a good plan. This would enable all the powers of the world to be able to put forward their concerns and requests thus causing the League of Nations to act upon these concerns and requests. The Paris Peace Settlements were balanced on different needs which allow different countries to have different settlements in respect to their situation. In conclusion I disagree that the Paris Peace Settlements were fair as the British and the French allowed themselves to take excess land. This meant that even some of the victorious nations felt they were not getting enough land as they deserve. This is shown as a few years later the victorious nations that believe they should have received more land start to take things into their own hands and take more land. I believe that too much land was taken off the defeated nations and this would cause them to be unsatisfied with the outcome of the settlements. This is shown as a few years after the defeated nations started to take some of their lost land back from the occupying countries. ?? ?? ?? ?? Deniz Hilmi 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Were the peace treaties of 1919 - 1923 fair?

    4 star(s)

    The Treaty of Trianon weakened Hungry; whilst Hungry were united with Austria it was a country that posed a danger to Britain and France. The Treaty of Trianon weakened Hungry giving two thirds of its territory to Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia and Romania.

  2. How fair were the Paris Peace Treaties

    While the treaty of Versailles had Germany sign off only 12% of its people, 10 of its coal mines and pay reparations of (6.6 billion. If they had made Russia pay as hard the treaty of Versailles was not as harsh towards Germany and was fair towards them.

  1. Were the Peace Settlements after World War One Justified?

    The Saar was to be controlled by the Allies for fifteen years and then a plebiscite was to be held. This was unfair because it was a significant blow to Germany's finance. On the other hand, Alsace-Lorraine was returned to France.

  2. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    This would have been a difficult task.. The allies did however declare war, but no military actions were taken. This war is often referred to as the phony war becaus! e they never fought. In the following spring of 1940, after a cold and long winter, Hitler went on to

  1. Explain the different aims of the three leaders, Clemenceau, Lloyd-George, and Wilson at the ...

    The League bound members to oaths (covenants) and principles that aimed to provide collective security for the world. To prevent war, members would submit their quarrels to the League and "in no case to resort to war until three months after the award by the arbitrators or the report by

  2. The year of 1919 had Europe's feet placed firmly on the ground. It was ...

    The continent was divided into two powers that harbored tension. Any conflict would ignite a war between the six major powers. Germany had dragged other countries into its scheme that led to many negative outcomes in the future. These other allies such as Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire were dragged

  1. The Treaties of Sevres and Lausanne

    All the powers were exhausted after a draining war that had lasted four years, much longer than most had anticipated. They were not only physically but also morally. The four years had cost the countries a great deal of money and supplies not to mention human lives.

  2. Why did international peace collapse in 1939?

    Hitler would never had attempted to fight a war on two fronts and would never have invaded Poland since the USSR was backing it up and Hitler did not quite know how strong the USSR was. On the other hand, it was not the most important factor since with or

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work