• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the strengths and weaknesses of the collective security concept?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What are the strengths and weaknesses of the collective security concept? After the First World War, people feel to want to have more peace and to live as same as before. And I think this is one of the biggest strength of the collective security concept - the power of inhabitants. To have collective security concept is really very good for peace, we can make sure that there will be more peace than before, that another war won't be able to be set up so easily. People will feel more safety and our world will be more stable, because if anything is going to happen, there'll be at least a support, which will try to make the bar (our world) ...read more.

Middle

The relationships between countries also follow this principle. So as the league of nation is set up, it could pin the conflict between the countries. As written in the 10th Article of the League of Nations: 'The members of the league undertake to preserve against external aggression the territory and existing independence of all members of the League. In case of threat of danger the Council (of the League) shall advise upon the means by which this obligation shall be fulfilled.' We can see how important here is the role of the League of Nation. It can help the side, which he thinks is right. BUT...this is perhaps also a very big reason why the members of the league will try to buy over other members, so when they have to decide something, the member with more sides (more hands or votes) ...read more.

Conclusion

So the League couldn't be successful, because it couldn't even deal with the chaos in the world. And also another weakness is that, not all of the countries signed the treaty, because there weren't many profit for many countries. As the treaty said - all nations who join the treaty has to disarm and when the country leaves the treaty or doesn't listen the treaty, they won't trade with that country and will send armies to deal with it. So if there are not many benefits for the countries, why will they join the League? And as less countries are joining the League, it couldn't provide international security. There's limited area of influence. So from upon points we can see, there's many strengths and also weaknesses. But even collective security is a very good thing, it wasn't possible to be successful. History - Question ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. The idealist of the 10th point - the collective security concept.

    (Because it's for nothing and nobody can depends on it.) Yes! The League of Nation is set up and its 10th point is really VERY good! But what if the countries in the League won't listen them?

  2. Analyse the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Versailles Settlement.

    Craters, barbed wire, trenches, corpses and grief were stacked high over France's farmlands and towns. The British and Americans sought lofty, abstract goals such as 'freedom', 'the righting of injustice' : not as easy to achieve as the purity of aspiration to fulfillment.2 France's demands and requirements, at least moved

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work