• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What Brought About the Signing of the Magna Carta and What Does This Tell Us About the Leadership of King John?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐What Brought About the Signing of the Magna Carta and What Does This Tell Us About the Leadership of King John? When John became king he inherited a large empire. His power stretched from the edge of Scotland to the south of France. It included all of England and much of France, and was known as the Angevin Empire. However this huge empire was not automatically his. To take possession of the French par of the Empire, he had to promise to serve the King of France. The current King of France and the French barons did not want John as king. They wanted his nephew Arthur. Back in England, John was better placed. He had the good will of the barons. They all agreed he was the right person to be the new king. However, John?s brother Richard had left some big problems for John to sort out. He wad spent much of his reign fighting Crusades. ...read more.


He lost control of Aquitaine and lost the region of Norway. John spent most of his reign trying to win back these French lands. John raised a tax called scutage. This was a tax raised by the King when he wanted. Barons would have to provide a certain amount of armed nights of the equivalent amount in money depending on the size of their land. John asked the barons for six times more Scutage than the last two Kings put together. This was not against the law, but it greatly annoyed the barons. He also put Relief tax up. Relief was a tax played for by the Baron?s sons where they played a kind of ?inheritance tax?. He also sold important positions at court to the highest bidder, ignoring advice, and even to foreigners. To enforce these taxes, King John ?invited? the Baron?s sons to Court. They would not come home if the Barons did not pay their taxes. ...read more.


They decided they needed a charter, agreed by the king that would secure their rights and would control the king. They sent soldiers to occupy London and John was forced to negotiate. On 19th June 1215, at Runnymede near Windsor, Magna Carta was signed. At the beginning of his reign, John tried to tie all loose ends, as it were. He was unlucky. His marriage with Isabella of Angoulême, that would have been very useful in controlling his Angevin empire, fell through. He tried to recapture Normandy, but was totally defeated. All of these were good ideas, but they just didn’t work out. King John’s leadership was a failure; he alienated his barons, and got excommunicated by the Pope. But despite all these negative things, King John’s reign was so important because of the Magna Carta. Not only was this the first time that the King’s power had been limited, but the whole of our judicial system that we know the day he based on the Magna Carta. I think that King John’s leadership should not be remembered for his failures, but for the impact on life that we know today. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Was John a bad king? From 1199 to 1216 John was King of England. ...

    During my time researching John's reign I have come across a number of primary sources that say bad things about John. Monks wrote these sources. A couple of the monks in question were called Roger of Wendover and Matthew Paris.

  2. William was successful at Hastings because of his leadership of the Normans.(TM) To what ...

    The English army was also exhausted from days of solid marching and had very little time to eat and rest before the battle. This reflects on Harold's organisational skills. He went into a battle with an exhausted and under equipped army.

  1. What Do Roman Authors Tell Us About The Celts? To What Extent Are Their ...

    To conclude, the Roman authors thought that the Celts were rather similar to the continental Gauls, but more barbaric in nature and old-fashioned. Caesar and Tacitus wrote that the Britons were still fighting in chariots, which were almost a thing of the past in the rest of the Roman world,

  2. Why Did King Philip Invade England? And why was it a failiure?

    Many of the Spanish vessels were converted merchant ships, better suited to carrying cargo than engaging in warfare at sea. They were broad and heavy, and could not maneuver quickly under sail. This might not at first glance have seemed a problem to the Spanish.

  1. Death of King Charles

    He started praying and put his hand out. Everything went quiet and the large axe had beheaded him in seconds. The executioner held his beheaded head up to prove to everyone it was actually done. Some people fainted whilst others cheered and clapped.

  2. Martin luther king

    These events had nothing to do with MLK but both of these events were successful without him although he was able to build upon these foundations. Although the segregation on busses was abolished by MLK, it still remained in southern state of Alabama.

  1. Race Relations in the US since 1954

    However, the jury at the James Byrd trial contained a range of different races and ethnic groupings.

  2. How successful was the leadership of Mao Tse-Tung between 1949 to 1976? Address economic, ...

    The five anti-movement policy was designed to benefit the economy by preventing issues such as tax evasion and fraud.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work