• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What contribution did the Zollverein make to the unification of Germany?

Extracts from this document...


What contribution did the Zollverein make to the unification of Germany? The contribution of the Zollverein to the unification of Germany has been a frequently disputed topic amongst historians. The traditional view of Bismarck as the architect of German Unification has led to what D.G Williamson terms an 'excessive emphasis on military and diplomatic history' i. Nonetheless, Williamson also identifies the more recent knee-jerk reaction, an exaggeration of the importance of economic factors. This has led to near dismissal of all other issues, with historians seeing the 'establishment of the Empire of 1871 as merely the formal completion of a unity already achieved in the economic sphere' ii. Clearly, one must take into account the contribution of all factors towards German Unification in order to create a representative history. The debate is ongoing, nonetheless, in this essay I will attempt to construct an account of the Zollverein's contribution to unification from the sources at my disposal. The Zollverein, essentially a free trade union of German states, was established by Prussia in 1834. From this period onwards it expanded to include nearly all of the German states, but notably not Austria. Its origins lay in the 1818 Prussian Customs Union which sought to create some kind of economic unity between the newly acquired, geographically separate enclaves of Prussia. Before the creation of the PCU there had been customs barriers not only between Prussia and the other German States but also between Prussia's internal provinces, whilst foreign imports were unrestricted. ...read more.


Therefore, although by joining the Zollverein the German states appeared to be moving towards unification, in fact their leaders felt they were preventing it, or at least hoping for a more acceptable autocratic form. This analysis of events sheds a very different light on the contribution of the Zollverein to German Unification. Nonetheless, if the German princes felt they were moving away from political unification they were certainly moving towards economic unification, which other historians such as W.O Henderson have placed as a principal factor underlying German Unification. The Zollverein appeared to be fulfilling German economist Friedrich List's (1789-1846) prediction that an economic would form the basis of a German national state. Prussia's ascendancy in the union meant, that although any member state could negotiate foreign trade treaties, it was nearly always Prussia who did so. By the 1850s the 'the emergent economic power of entrepreneurs [created by the Zollverein] constrained the freedom of action of German governments'. In essence, the Zollverein came to be force for German unity, which even if opposed by rulers of member states, was supported by their people. Nevertheless, it is important not to overestimate the unifying affect of the Zollverein. German Unification was by no means inevitable, in the same way that 'no one assumes today that the European Union will inevitably lead to a European State'vi. ...read more.


When Bismarck became Prussian first minister in 1862, with the stated aim of German Unification under the Prussian crown Prussia 'had already gone a long way towards gaining economic control over Germany'. Thus, Bismarck's assertion that the years 1815-48 were 'the time when nothing happened' seems unfair. However, the amount of work left for Bismarck to do if he wished to unite Germany must not be underestimated. 'The Zollverein created a common German market rather than fully integrated economy', this statement seems especially true in light of the fact that Hamburg and Bremen only joined the Zollverein in 1888, 17 years after they had become constituents of the 1871 German Empire. The Zollverein also did nothing towards creating a unified German culture or religion, although it did help southern Germany to forget its religious divisions with the north. Fundamentally, the Zollverein gave economic unity to Germany and the initiations of political unity, Prussia the strength to dominate and overcome Austria creating a Kleindeutschland, yet all of this would be irrelevant were it not for the already present German cultural identity and the brilliant diplomacy of Otto von Bismarck. The Zollverein paved the way for German Unification to happen, but it did not make it happen. i D.G Williamson, Bismarck and Germany 1862-1890 ii W.O Henderson, The Zollverein iii W.G Shreeves, Nationmaking in Nineteenth Century Europe iv AJP Taylor, The Course of German History v ibid vi J.Breuilly, The formation of the First German Nation-State 1800-1871 vii Fallesleben viii ibid ix A.Stiles, The Unification of Germany 1815-90 x ibid ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. To what extent was the unification of Prussia due to weaknesses of Austria?

    Nonetheless, Austria continued to be the dominant power as at the time, Prussia could not even dream of effectively competing against her, had it not been for Austria's own decline that encouraged her to. For example, the reactionary policies of Metternich such as the Karlsbed Decrees might have been perpetuated

  2. Italian Unification

    4 Cavour's motives for Piedmont and Italy are questionable. At certain points in his lifetime, he seemed to have felt that complete unification was not necessary nor desirable. His exact motives are unclear. Did he react to stop Garibaldi's attack on Rome to prevent him from becoming a leader of


    He got caught but fortunately he managed to escape before he was sentenced to death. Mazzini also went into exile to London where he spent the next few years planning many uprisings and riots. In 1848 Mazzini's dreams seemed to be realized when news of the Revolutions throughout Europe reached him.

  2. To what extent was Austria the main obstacle to the unification of Italy in ...

    Balbo was slightly different in his views from the other Piedmontese Monarchists as seen in his writing in 1844 "On the Hopes of Italy". He saw the future of Italy being best ensured by the creation of an Italian Confederation where the Pope would play a role, though in which

  1. Why has Prussia replaced Austria as the leading Germanic power by 1870?

    were producing these products themselves meaning there was no need for trade to take place. In fact, in 1811, Austria had to declare itself bankrupt, and so for many years after this 39% of its whole revenue went to paying back loans that they had borrowed from other countries.

  2. Unification Movements - Italian unification

    * In 1860, people in the Sicilies started to revolt to fight against their monarchs, the Bourbon family (the royal family name). Garibaldi (a nationalist) and his Thousand Red Shirts gathered in Genoa and succeeded to get Naples and the Sicilies because the soldiers of Naples thought that the Red Shirts were the British army.

  1. Describe the Different Stages to Italian unification between 1856 - 1871.

    Combined with the war of 1859 the overspill of international sentiment was also crucial role in the unification of Italy. On January 14th, 1858, Napoleon III had narrowly escaped an assassination attempt; punishment for failing to liberate Italy. This was very significant in terms of Italian unification as later on

  2. Piedmont for a leader in establishing unity.

    Austria was an obstacle to a much greater extent now. Piedmont was also defeated at Novara (23rd March 1849). Following a renewed outbreak of violence in Vienna in March 1849, Charles Albert again marched his troops into Lombardy. The King was heartbroken when his troops were defeated again and abdicated in favour of his son Victor Emmanuel II.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work