• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What different tactics were used by both sides in an attempt to win the conflict in Vietnam between 1956 and 1968?

Extracts from this document...


Sam Coleman MAU 12/7/2001 What different tactics were used by both sides in an attempt to win the conflict in Vietnam between 1956 and 1968? The U.S.A expected an easy victory in Vietnam. The US president Johnson had access to vast financial resources and the latest in technology, and of course they were fighting a third world country that had no such resources or money. The VC/NVA expected to win because they had already defeated the French and Japanese using guerrilla tactics and therefore expected to defeat the U.S.A. The war was being fought in Vietnam; therefore the VC/NVA had a better knowledge and experience of fighting in the forest area and environment, gained from conflicts against the French, as well as the support from their fellow Vietnamese. Knowledge of the forest was particularly helpful as the US troops were inexperienced at fighting in this environment. As the war developed, both sides had to adapt their tactics due to the way that the opposition was fighting. The VC/NVA used a strategy of guerrilla tactics. This involved winning the support and co-operation the peasants. They did this by promising them land and freedom from imperialism. The guerrilla's would hide in a community of a small village or town. The guerrillas did not wear a uniform and therefore it was very difficult for US soldiers to distinguish a VC soldier from a peasant. This would provide a basis for an ambush that would take place at night. ...read more.


The Americans avoided bombing major cities of Hanoi and Haiphong as they did not want to do any more damage to their relationship with the USSR. They hoped the bombings would show the North Vietnamese people what power the US had at its disposal. But mass bombing didn't destroy the morale of the North Vietnamese. The US also bombed the Ho Chi Minh Trail. In fact the Americans had dropped a total of 7 million tonnes of bombs - twice that dropped in the Second World War. The Americans used 'hearts and minds' to win over the affection of the Vietnamese people. They did this by providing them with schools and hospitals. This worked as some Vietnamese co-operated closely with the Americans. Others made money from the presence in their country. Most Vietnamese, outside the cities, saw the Americans as their enemy. They saw them kill and destroy, therefore not winning their 'hearts and minds.' The Vietcong response to the US tactics was to dig a network of tunnels. Over 150 miles of tunnels were built under South Vietnam. This provided the Vietcong with shelter from Americans. Here they moved and lived undetected. The Americans believed that the Vietcong were forced to build these tunnels due to the devastation that the Americans had caused. This could have been seen as a slight morale booster for the Americans. But this was a sign of the Vietcong's determination rather than a sign of weakness. ...read more.


The final reason for US failure was the rotation of troops. After one year of fighting American troops were sent home and troops were bought into replace them. This was of a disadvantage to the Americans as troops had little time to adapt to fighting in dense forestry and by the time they were leaving had only just started to have sufficient knowledge of the area. Inexperienced troops also fell victim to booby traps as knowledge of them had yet to be gathered and tell tail signs of them was unknown. With news of the massacre of a war that these new troops were to enter, many of them entered with a low morale and low will to fight. Furthermore, the Vietcong proved to be very resistant and determined enemies. The Vietcong were able to win the support of the peasants. This made the Vietcong able to have the basis to launch an ambush and to hide amongst a community, which made them hard to find. This also contributed to American frustration. The Vietcong also had a higher morale than the US troops. They were confident as they were fighting on home soil and had experience in fighting in the forestry environment against previous opponents like the French. The Vietcong were also extremely determined. This can be proven by the creation of tunnels that were used as shelter from the US airforces. These tunnels were very complex and ran for about 250 kilometres, this proved that the Vietcong were hardworking and extremely determined to resist the American bombardment. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. Describe the military tactics used by both the USA and the Vietcong forces in ...

    However only one side could be successful, and that was the Vietcong. The Americans then upped their game and went on to 'Search and Destroy', which led to the Vietcong updating their tactics using booby traps designed to destroy the US soldiers' morale.

  2. Describe the military tactics used by both the USA and the Vietcong forces in ...

    In these areas should anything move they would be shot or even napalmed. An essential part of the guerrilla warfare involved using the lush canopy of the jungle as cover from all sides. The US used a chemical defoliant, Agent Orange on the countryside to make the guerrilla tactics less effective.

  1. Did the power of television force the US to leave Vietnam?

    Therefore the Vietnamese peasants saw the Americans as the bad people and the Vietcong as the good people. The poster also portrays the Americans as being weak and unskilled and this would definitely also influence the thoughts of the communist audience the poster was intended to target.

  2. Describe the military tactics used by both the USA and the Vietcong forces in ...

    They fought a political war as well as an armed struggle and were adept at persuading the population to aid them and to give them shelter. It was almost impossible to win a war against an enemy that was 'invisible', the US troops felt bamboozled and harassed by troops they could not see.

  1. Military tactics used by both the USA and the Vietcong forces in Vietnam in ...

    The Vietcong moved their trails to the neutral countries of Laos and Cambodia where they could not be found. These trails became the most important source to the Vietcong, the Ho chi min trail. Although the US was finding the Vietcong difficult, they believed that they could keep the Southern strong holds of Saigon and other main cities.

  2. Why are there different views about the influence of media on the course of ...

    I shall look at and asses some sources which support this particular viewpoint. Source O states that 'the media elite possess little power in affecting change in political policy or the system for policy making.' This source infers that the media had did influence the course of the war because

  1. Why was there opposition to the Vietnam war?

    Source C contridicts this because Johnson had to keep sending more and more troops to Vietnam because they couldnt cope. He felt 60,000 would be enough to win the war easily, but the numbers kept going up, and by 1969, there were 542,000 troops in Vietnam and America still couldnt secure a victory.

  2. How Effective Were The Tactics Of Search And Destroy And Defoliation During The Vietnam ...

    It is fifty times more concentrated than normal herbicides, this extreme intensity completely destroys all plants in the area. Agent Orange was one of the main mixtures used during Operation Ranch Hand. The Operation was intended to deprive Vietnamese farmers and guerrilla fighters of clean food and water in hopes

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work