• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What different tactics were used by both sides in an attempt to win the conflict in Vietnam between 1965-1968?

Extracts from this document...


What different tactics were used by both sides in an attempt to win the conflict in Vietnam between 1965- 1968 by Melanie Fields In this essay, I will discuss the various tactics used by the U.S.A. and Vietnam in their attempts to win the Vietnam War. I will look at all of the tactics used by both sides, how effective they were and if they helped to win the Vietnam War. In this essay, I will also look at why the U.S.A. lost even though they had better weapons and resources than Vietnam. America firstly became involved in Vietnam's affairs in 1945 when America gave financial support to France who at the time were the colonial rulers of Indo-China at the time and were fighting a war of independence against Vietnam. America became politically involved in 1954 at the Geneva Conference when it was decided that Vietnam should be split into two along the 17th parallel until 1956 when there would be public elections held for re-unification of the country. America became militarily involved in 1964 when U.S. ships were attacked in the Gulf of Tonkin. At this time, this was not official military involvement of the U.S. America became officially militarily involved in Vietnam in 1965 when America sent combat troops into South Vietnam to aid them and to stop the spread of communism from the North of Vietnam into the South of Vietnam. ...read more.


These included the Bouncing Betty, which was a bomb with prods, and when it was stood on, it would bounce up and explode. The tin can trap was a bomb inside a can, and when it exploded, it would send shrapnel flying about. The Vietcong also used grenades with trip wires. This surprised and killed the American soldiers as they could not see the trip wire that the Vietnamese used. The Vietnamese often concealed these wires. This tactic was very effective as it terrified U.S. soldiers and sapped the U.S. morale. Altogether, Vietcong tactics were very effective. Now I shall discuss American tactics. The first tactic I shall discuss is financial aid. Before America became militarily involved in the fight against Vietnamese communism, they became financially involved. In 1956 they provided the French (who were then the colonial rulers of Indo-China which included Vietnam) with money to aid them in their fight against the Vietnamese who wanted too claim independence again and were rebelling against their rulers. This was ineffective as the French later lost this war at the battle of Dien Bien Phu and were driven out of Vietnam. The next tactic that I shall discuss is Military Equipment and Advisors. From 1958-1963, America sent increasing amounts of money, military equipment and advisors to aid South Vietnam in their fight against the communist North Vietnam. ...read more.


used against the Vietcong as they were not used to this type of battle as the terrain was completely different to what they were used to. The Vietnamese won the war because they were battle hardened as they and been fighting ever since the Japanese occupation of Indo-China during World War 2. The Vietnamese were also used to the terrain that they were fighting on and developed better tactics to suit the terrain. The Vietnamese had many good tactics because they were battle hardened and suited to the terrain that they were fighting on. Guerrilla Warfare was effective, the Vietnamese Network of Tunnels was effective, the Ho Chi Minh was effective, the Relocation of Industries was effective, the Use of Women and Children was effective, the Major Offensives were effective and the Booby Traps used in combat were effective as well. The Vietnamese used very effective tactics all round. The Americans did not have very good tactics because they were not used to the terrain that they were fighting on, the country and its deadly wildlife and many of the American soldiers had never fought before. Financial aid was ineffective, Military equipment was ineffective, Military Combat was ineffective, Blanket Bombing was ineffective, Chemical Weapons were ineffective, Search and Destroy was ineffective, the Strategic Hamlet Program was ineffective and the use of Helicopters was effective. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. Did the power of television force the US to leave Vietnam?

    This source is biased because is only gives a one sided view. It only shows us how America's actions led to the devastation in Vietnam but it does not show us the positive or beneficial side/factors of America's actions and involvement in Vietnam.

  2. Why are there different views about the influence of media on the course of ...

    The coverage being very anti war is also supported by a veteran of the name Alex Horster, who said that before he went to war he thought that the coverage was very against the whole idea of a war in Vietnam.

  1. Compare the tactics of the two sides in the Vietnam War.

    All of these tactics were useful to the US in many different ways the styles of Tactics of the US are all very militarily weapon like. Vietcong Tactics The VC had 3 main Tactics which consisted of Guerrilla warfare, the ho chi minh and the vietnamisation Guerrilla warfare was a

  2. Comparative Essay: José de San Martín vs. Simón Bolívar - two of the primary ...

    Mart�n slowly imposed taxes and raised an army and the supplies necessary to sustain it. He also gained financing from another person who believed Lima (in Peru) could be attacked through the Andes. Once an army was gathered, Mart�n used sneaky tactics to fool his enemies.

  1. What different tactics were used by both sides in an attempt to win the ...

    Also such traps as the "Punji Trap" which is similar to the concealed hole, but with spikes in the bottom. There was also the grenade attached to a trip wire, which meant that when a soldier walked through the wire, the grenade would spring out and explode on them.

  2. What different tactics were used by both sides in an attempt to win the ...

    The bombing only strengthened the Resolve of the North Vietnamese and the VC were still obtaining supplies from the north Via the Ho Chi Minh trail. The bombing was a failure the VC even made booby traps out of the unexploded shells.

  1. How effective were the US tactics of 'Search and Destroy' and 'Defoliation' in the ...

    because controlling the direction of the spray was very difficult which led to the aforementioned disadvantages (Source 1). The main disadvantages came from using Agent Orange, which was exposed to 5 million Vietnamese (Source 3). It cause genetic defects in 50,000 children until the present day and 400,000 deaths (Source 1).

  2. How Effective Were The Tactics Of Search And Destroy And Defoliation During The Vietnam ...

    Furthermore, this led to the My Lai Massacre which was undoubtedly one of the most notorious events of the Vietnam War. My Lai was a village with roughly 700. On March 16th 1968, 1 platoon was commanded by Lieutenant William Calley and was ordered to My Lai village.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work