• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What happened at Sharpeville on 21 March 1960? Massacre or self defence?

Extracts from this document...


What happened at Sharpeville on 21 March 1960? Massacre or self defence? 1. (a) Both Sources A and B agree that there were Saracen armoured cars around on the morning of the events. They also agree that there were large amounts of police. Source A says; "There were plenty of police", Source B mentions "police reinforcements". Another thing on which both sources agree is the large numbers of people protesting in the crowd. The sources mention; "There were crowds on the streets" (Source A) and that there were "thousands of Africans shouting" (Source B). Both sources agree that the Africans were approaching the police station. Also both sources mention the crowds chanting and using slogans. Source A says people were shouting 'Izwe Lethu (Our Land)'. This chant could have created an intimidating atmosphere for the white policeman and they could have become angered, scared and worried for their own and their colleagues safety. This also shows that the Africans were extremely patriotic. The other source shows this aswell but is it not the same slogan that is mentioned; 'Africa, Africa' they are said to be saying. Both sources agree that the crowds were very lively. 1. (b) Sources A and B disagree on the atmosphere that was created at the time. Source A seems to create a happy, joyful atmosphere. It says; 'It was like a Sunday outing'. However Source B creates an atmosphere of a nervous, angry and even violent crowd. It says 'the police station was violently besieged' and '[the car] emerged [from the crowd] as a wreck and the people inside were injured'. ...read more.


Both Sources G and E seem to give the impression that no weapons were found around the bodies of the dead. I think that Source G is more useful because it is not really a person's opinion it is just a photograph whereas the persons opinion could have been biased or he many have not been telling the truth. 5. (a) South Africa is a nation with many different cultures and races. The South African authorities were white and were mainly descendants of the Dutch settlers, the Boers. There were also many black tribes in South Africa including the Bantu farmers, the Xhosa and the Khoisan. The British, Germans and French also had settled in South Africa in the 19th century and before. In the early 20th century (1910 onwards) the South African government started to become mainly made up of people from the Boer or white races. Up until 1948 there was a growing feeling among the white population that blacks and coloured people were inferior and should be controlled and many laws were passed that required blacks to give up land (1913 Land Act) or work for the whites. In 1948 Malan the newly elected President claimed that South Africa belonged to the Afrikaners (Boers) and he set up the apartheid state which restricted blacks even more. Blacks were made to carry passes and had to have different education. This created a great deal of hatred and on the whole the blacks and whites did not like each other. This created a sense that the blacks were inferior to the whites. ...read more.


I think that the second interpretation is poorly backed up because they are mainly people in the South African authorities who may be biased against the Africans. 7. People disagree about the events at Sharpeville because there is no conclusive evidence to show what has happened and people would hear different information from different sources like the ones shown. If somebody had seen Source B they would probably have different views to somebody who had seen Source E. Also there is still some tension between the blacks and whites in South Africa and around the world so people may stick up for their racial group because they were so used to being separate for so long. Different Sources disagree about the basic fact such as how many people were at Sharpeville. It is also hard to tell what really happened because the sources could be biased. For example Dr. Verwoerd the South African Prime Minister would be likely to be biased against the blacks because after all he was encouraging the separation of blacks and whites. Also eyewitnesses at Sharpeville may be exaggerating the truth. It appears that sources A, C, E and F are all against the actions of the police that caused the events at Sharpeville, they all either show the supposedly happy and joyful crowd before the event or the dead and wounded after the event. The other sources, B, G, H and I appear to be supporting the idea that the police where acting in self defence at Sharpeville, these sources suggest that the South African police were provoked and had no other option but to fire on the crowd. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1941-80 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1941-80 essays

  1. Why was the Sharpeville Massacre Produced such different interpretations?

    where they lived, if without a pass they were put in prison or they lost there job. The reason the Sharpville massacre had such different interpretations was because no one knew who to believe the whites or the blacks because they would both be bias.

  2. Why did white minority rule last so long in South Africa?

    The killings at Sharpville and the subsequent disinvestments were perhaps the precursors to the downfall of the racist policies of the Government. That is not to say that there was change directly after the event, in fact it caused the government to become even more repressive.

  1. Study Source A, The Long Shadow of little Rock . What can you learn ...

    hysterically" The Negroes are in our School", and in Source C a girl behind her is obviously shouting at her. The Evidence from Source B and C support Elizabeth Eckford's view of the events that happened. Her account of events included hostile reactions towards her and these are shown directly as similar events are recalled in the other Sources.

  2. History on Sharpeville

    be because they thought the blacks were violent people, but we know that they are kind people because they haven't attacked them and the police may thought that they posed a dangerous threat. Source B says that 'there was shooting in the morning in which one African was killed' if

  1. Apartheid was created by Dr Malan, and was introduced in 1948 in South Africa. ...

    Apartheid was all going to plan for Dr Malan, but he still hadn't finished yet. The next chapter in the apartheid series, was pass books brought in for blacks to carry on them 24 hours a day, for the rest of their lives.

  2. "We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal

    Despite some changes in education there were aspects in other areas still not changed. For a black man or women in the South registering to vote was an act of great courage. Fannie Lou Hamer tells us what happen to her.

  1. The split in the 19th century - Woman suffrage movement

    as Stanton and Anthony realized that the 15th Amendment was an opportunity for woman suffrage that was not likely to come again in that generation. As Stanton wrote in retrospect, "The few who had the prescience to see the long years of apathy that always follow a great conflict, strained

  2. Was Australia Settled Or Invaded By The Europeans?

    There were clear instructions that the Aboriginal people were protected by the King's law and could not be treated as enemies of the state. Only a few people took this seriously but the Aboriginals had been hunting the settlers' sheep and cattle just as they have been hunting native kangaroos and emus for thousands of years.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work