• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What Happened At Sharpeville On 21 March 1960- Massacre Or Self Defence?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What Happened At Sharpeville On 21 March 1960 - Massacre Or Self Defence? Q1 Source A and Source B are similar in many ways. They both mention the presence of Saracen cars "Saracen armoured cars" (source A), "Saracens were at Sharpeville" (source B) and they both mention the presence of Police, "a big grey police car" (source A), "Police reinforcements" (Source B). These two sources differ too. They differ because in source A there are "three Saracen armoured cars", however in source B there are "a dozen Saracens". Overall the tone of the two sources is completely different. This is because while one source states that there are "three Saracen cars" the other states that there are "a dozen Saracens". This meaning that one of the sources is wrong. The reason for this is because the writers of these sources are different. One is from England and one is from South Africa. This is important because the South African writer may be trying to get rid of apartheid. The English writer does not really have a motive; this is because the police may have given this report to him and he believes them. Q2 Source C supports source A. this is because in source C you can see that the protestors peaceful and that there were Saracen cars around. In source A it mentions the presence of Saracen cars "Saracen armoured cars" in source A it implies that the protestors are peaceful "some kids waved to the policemen". ...read more.

Middle

Sources E and G are different because we cannot see what the people are running from and we cannot see any police. Though we can see a building behind the protestors we cannot be sure that it is a police station. In source E it says that there is "no living thing in the huge compound in front of the police station" however in source G we can see that people are running. In source E we are also told that the protestors are running from bullets"we heard the chatter of machine guns" however we cannot see the bullets. Source E is the more useful of the two sources when wishing to discover what happened at Sharpeville because it explains in great detail what happened. The photograph however does not do this, as we can only understand what is happening because we are told about it in Source E. However if we combine the evidence provided by both of the sources we are given an overall view of what has happened. These two sources compliment each other and make Tyler's account more reliable. Q5 Source H is written by Colonel Piernaar a police commander at Sharpeville. He made this statement so that he could protect the police's popularity. This source justifies police action by saying that black people become violent when in large groups "the native mentality does not allow African to gather for peaceful demonstrations" therefore saying that the police did not open fire first and when they did they did it in self-defence. ...read more.

Conclusion

Source I supports statement b as it says that "disturbances occurred" However Source A disagrees with statement b as it says that the protestors are not violent "they were grinning and cheerful". Source B disagrees with statement b as it says that a council car was present and in the statement there is no mention of the council car. Source C disagrees with statement b as it shows that the people are standing around. Source D disagrees with statement b as it shows that the people are doing a peaceful protest. Source E disagrees with Statement b as it says that "Hundreds of women rushed past us" Source F disagrees with statement b as it says that the protestors were completely innocent. Source G shows disagrees with statement a as it shows people to be unarmed, therefore they could not have harmed police. Source H does not disagree with statement b. Source I does not disagree with statement b. There is evidence that sources a to I provide that support both statement to a certain point. It is important to note that some sources may be biased; this may be to justify or highlight the events. This brings reliability into question. However the most accurate statement seems to be statement a. this is because statement a is strengthened a lot more than statement b making it the more reliable of the two. This is because sources A to I almost have exactly the same thing in common with statement a, this is the fact that the protestors are not violent. 1875 Words in total. Abdul Mufti Candidate Number: 4138 Centre Number: 13329 11. F ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1941-80 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1941-80 essays

  1. Why was the Sharpeville Massacre Produced such different interpretations?

    The whites were saying that the blacks were deliberately breaking the law to provoke a reaction. They also said that the blacks were throwing stones and that they had fierce weapons, but in source f it is clearly seen that they don not have any kind of weapons.

  2. Study Source A, The Long Shadow of little Rock . What can you learn ...

    Malcolm X was the leader of the Black Power movement, he believed in a violent approach if that was what was needed. He was against racial equality and advocated black power. He would have won people support because he had an outlet for Black Americans Anger.

  1. The Sharpeville massacre.

    Then it goes on to say that without any warning the police opened fire at the Blacks. Then the protesters quickly turned and fled the scene, but many of them were shot down, and some were on the floor, when police 'rifle-butted and kicked and booted many women who were

  2. What happened at Sharpeville on 21 March 1960? Massacre or self defence?

    Sources C and D are both photographs and they only provide a snapshot of the view of what was going on at the time. The pictures could have been taken as propaganda and they may only show what the photographers wanted them to show.

  1. History on Sharpeville

    be because they thought the blacks were violent people, but we know that they are kind people because they haven't attacked them and the police may thought that they posed a dangerous threat. Source B says that 'there was shooting in the morning in which one African was killed' if

  2. Were the sixties swinging?

    portrayal as the swinging decade, or as a source in a proper educational history book. We can see from my interviews so far that this kind of lifestyle was certainly not lived by the majority of people. Although many thought that this was the life led by most MODs.

  1. Apartheid - source related study.

    received the most money in "pounds per head", which means that "�63.92" was spent on each white person and only a quarter of this was spent on education for the blacks. This source can help to understand the effect Apartheid had upon South Africans because it shows that whites got better education than non-whites.

  2. South Africa and Apartheid: Have the effects of apartheid disappeared?

    This led to the ANC coming into power with nelson Mandela as the first black president of south Africa. Since Apartheid have things improved? To answer this question I will evaluate the following sources: Source A shows the level of education by race among those aged over twenty years of age.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work