• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9

What Happened at Sharpeville on 21st March 1960?Massacre or Self-Defence?

Extracts from this document...


Katie Bradford What Happened at Sharpeville on 21st March 1960? Massacre or Self-Defence? 1) How far do these two sources agree about what happened in Sharpeville on the morning of 21 March? The events, which occurred in Sharpeville on 21st March 1960, are disputed a lot. Some people argue that the police opened fire for no reason, whereas, others think the police were under attack and only opened fire in self-defence. Source A and Source B show a strong difference in opinion as to what happened on that major day in South African history. There are many opposing ideas and statements from both texts as to who was really to blame. Source A was written by a journalist from a South African magazine. At the beginning of his report he comments on how they were "driving behind a big grey police car and three Saracen armoured cars." This infers that the police were dominating the scene and were in control of the situation. In contrast with this is the statement from Source B, which was published in an English newspaper. The reporter states how "as soon as they got through (the crowds), the Africans closed the way again." This is suggesting another side to the story and how it was the Africans who were dominant. The use of the word "again" makes the readers think that it had happened many times before. Tyler, the journalist from Source A, explains how the protestors "were grinning and cheerful. Some kids waved to the policemen ... and two of them waved back." The source also explains that "the Africans did not appear to be alarmed by the cars." This suggests that they were unaware anything was going to happen as there was no escalation in tension between the two sides. However, Source B states how "there was a shooting in the morning" and "trouble was expected." ...read more.


The writer could have also picked up on things such as sounds, smells and tension, which could not have been experienced through film or reports. He uses a more realistic approach in his account, as he describes people's actions, expresses their opinions and uses comparisons. This is shown when it says, "He was swinging it around in a wide arc from his hip, as though he was fanning a movie camera." This enables the readers to relate to the events and therefore, feel more assured by it. The textual source also gives a lot more information as well as adding a lot of extra detail, which aggress with the photo. However, source E has a few features, which make it less useful as evidence. The writer happens to be a journalist, reporting for a South African magazine. This means that he is an expert in persuading people to take particular views. He was also the only journalist in Sharpeville and therefore, knew that no there accounts could be published and argued against his. This would make him more likely to alter the truth in order to gain more support for his side. Source G is also very important as proof of what happened at Sharpeville. It is photographic evidence and so can be used to validate other sources. The details can be compared to eyewitness accounts so that the false statements are discovered. The photographs cannot have been exaggerated or changed, which means that the shots are completely accurate. However, like Source E, there are also features, which makes this photo less useful. For example, it was only taken at one moment in time and cannot represent everything that happened. The photograph could have also been taken from a specific angle to show the scene that the photographer wanted to be published. This means that it could have been a biased shot and therefore, not useful as evidence. ...read more.


The writer of this statement is unknown, however, it is likely to be a white person if they had been allowed to write a book on South Africa. Therefore, it is impossible to determine whether it is a biased point of view or not. In Source B, the reported said, "the police station was virtually besieged by thousands of Africans" and that the police had to "force a way in using the Saracens." This implies that there was strong resistance and that the police were unable to cope with the aggressive protestors. The photographs from both Source's C and D also seem to paint a picture of overpowering protestors in contrast with a weak and helpless police force. In Source E, the police claimed, "they were in desperate danger because the crowd was stoning them...the police have also said that the crowd was armed with ferocious weapons." This implies that they were being very provocative and caused the shootings because of their irresponsible behaviour. The police commander at Sharpeville, speaking in Source H, explained how, "The native mentality does not allow Africans to gather for peaceful demonstrations" and that "Hoards surrounded the police station." He was one among many to share this opinion of the vast number of demonstrators and therefore, strengthened the case. The last source from the collection was written by Dr Verwoerd, the Prime Minister of South Africa in 1960. He commented on how the "Africans demonstrated in an unsuitable manner "by entering people's homes and forcibly removing the identity books." Again, this established a view of the protestors as being violent and uncooperative, a stereotype, which they had had for many years previous to this. After the acknowledgement of all Sources, it is extremely difficult to come to a definite response as to which interpretation is truthful. There is not enough evidence to prove that one statement is more reliable than the other and therefore, it is impossible to make an accurate decision. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. How far do these two sources agree about what happened at Sharpeville on the ...

    Another reason we could refer to source A to have a relaxed atmosphere would be because the reporter mentions that the Pan-Africans 'were grinning and cheerful. Some kids waved to the policemen sitting on the Saracens and two of them waved back'.

  2. The train pulled into the station slowly.

    A world that they could no longer enter was calling out to them. Ira had been lonely for years; she had felt misunderstood, detached, alone. As she recognised the infinite beauty of a seemingly simple smile, the feeling of joy overwhelmed her.

  1. Ireland coursework-Part AIreland has had a lot of trouble over the years for many ...

    They said they didn't shoot first and that if they had it was the IRA, so that didn't give reason for firing into crowds of people, joining in an illegal march didn't justify the army's action. After the incident the British took full control of the N.

  2. “Why has it proved so difficult to reach agreement about what happened on Bloody ...

    Whilst the question of Paratroop actions is still central to the Bloody Sunday debate, Widgery appears to realise that the IRA and the Nationalists will dispute being to blame. We know that the Paratroops are fierce from Magilligan, so theoretically they could have caused an unnecessary massacre.

  1. Examine Synge's Treatment of the Theme of Escapism in,

    Another means by which the people are looking for escapism is through a hero or an idol, and in the play, Christy is analogous to Jesus Christ. The people need a saviour because like the Jews in Jesus' time, the Irish are a land under occupation by formidable foreign power.

  2. The History of Conflict in Ireland.

    they said, "All bets are off." It reinforced the position of the Protestant paramilitaries, and made them a real force in the political game in Northern Ireland. It reinforced the fanatical voice of Protestant militism, some of those who claim that they were not, or didn't approve of violence, but used violent language.

  1. Blitz, the German word for 'lightning'

    When the present Troubles began around 1968 the IRA split: the really war-minded members broke away to form the Provisional IRA. But even the Provisionals are now negotiating for peace. There are other splinter-groups which don't want peace talks of any kind: these include the Irish National Liberation Army and the Real IRA.

  2. From studying all of the sources I do not think that it is possible ...

    Source B is a picture it shows us a mock movie poster showing the Irish in a bad light it also says they are psychopathic the picture is greatly exaggerated because again it say's the Irish meaning all but it is only some who were the bad people.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work