• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What Happened To the Romanov Family?

Extracts from this document...


What Happened To the Romanov Family? 1. (a) Sources A and B are both very similar, and in some ways these sources are reliable evidence, but in other ways these sources are not very reliable evidence. One way in which both of the accounts are reliable is that they both say that not all of the members of the Romanov family were killed. In fact in both accounts the same 5 people were mentioned as being murdered which show that this is likely to have happened. Another reason that the accounts may be reliable is because Judge Sergeyev wouldn't have had a motive in which to say that only 5 people were killed. This is because he was taking out an investigation on behalf of the whites, and if he would have had any bias it would have been towards the whole family being murdered by the Bolsheviks. A way in which the accounts are unreliable is that Judge Sergeyev's account is only taken from people who have spoken to him or who have read\d his report, so these people may not be telling the truth. Another reason is that Sir Charles Eliot seems very conclusive, and it doesn't seem like he is sure about what he was saying. ...read more.


This source is also unreliable though, as it was written by Judge Sokolov who was taking out an investigation on behalf of the whites, and he was a firm believer that the whole Romanov family were killed, and this could have had a bearing on his diagram. I think that source H is more reliable than source G because source g was drawn based on the investigation carried by the whites, which could have created a bias on the painting. As it is a painting it may also not be very accurate to the investigation due to human error, and it's not like a photograph which is 100% accurate. It also doesn't seem like the painting has much hard evidence, and I think that the artist drew this in order to convey the tsar as heroic as it shows him holding his son in his arms. I also think that source F wasn't as reliable as source H, because although it is a real picture, it has been taken by the whites and they could have easily doctored the photo to make it look like a massacre took place. Also, as the scene of the "murders" was under control by the whites at the time, they could have trashed the murder scene and make holes in the wall themselves in order to make it look like the whole family was killed. ...read more.


Although as with Sokolov's report, the newspaper does agree that the bodies were taken in a lorry and buried. I think the reason why Medvedev's comments disagreed with the newspaper article is because he was being tortured by the Whites, and therefore they could have manipulated him to say what they wanted him to hear. To conclude I think that the British newspaper report (source J) seemed to both compromise and confirm what was said in the other sources. It did seem to sum up the other sources as some of the verdicts were very different, i.e. the views of Sokolov and Sergeyev. I think this because it seemed to strike a balance between the 2 extremes of only the Tsar being killed, and the whole family being killed. This is because the report suggested that 5 members of the family were killed which is in the middle of Sokolov and Sergeyev's verdict. It is also between the 2 views of what happened after the murders took place, as Charles Eliot said, "No corpses were discovered, nor any trace of them being burned." Where Sokolov said, "The bodies were chopped in to pieces and burned with the aid of petrol and sulphuric acid." Source J goes in between again by saying that the bodies were buried in a bogged down swamp. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    The arrest of the Gang of Four was greeted with demonstrations in support of the arrests in every major city in China, including Jiang Qing's stronghold of Shanghai. Hua was now in control, but only as a stopgap. He was acceptable to a wide spectrum of the Party, being centre-left:

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    This is proof that Stalin was paranoid. As Stalin and Krushchev were very close, Krushchev probably felt he was safe from Stalin, however this may not have been the case as many times before, due to Stalin's paranoia he suspected people below him of trying to gain power, eventhough it may not have been true.

  1. What happened to the Romanov family? - Study Sources A and B. Sources A ...

    As far as the purposes of both sources are concerned, the information in both sources are different versions of the same findings from Sergeyev. Source A is an extract from an American newspaper. Inexorably, the bitter American media would have wanted to create a negative impression of the Bolscheviks who

  2. What happened to the Romanov Family

    the accounts in Source C are written by Judge Sokolov, Sergeyev's successor. Sokolov is adamant that every member of the Romanov family was killed in that house. His accounts are totally gruesome and gory, instead of saying killed he says "massacred" and he goes into detail on how supposedly the bodies were disposed of.

  1. What happened to the Romanov Family? - Sources A and B give similar accounts. ...

    Both sources A and B ultimately came from the same source of information, Judge Sergeyev and as such it can be concluded that it is not a major coincidence that the information they contain is similar, and as such their reliability is not affirmed merely from this.

  2. Stalin: Man or Monster - Sources Questions

    that he is greater then everyone else; this is certainly true as after all he had opposition. We read in the source by Bukharin that Stalin got rid of anyone that was better then him-opposition. This anyone that studied Stalin Russia would know is true.

  1. What Happened To The Romanov Family?

    In my opinion, this suggests that the evidence is not hard or strong enough. Source B also uses the word 'supposed' but not repeatedly. Source B also includes many points that are different to that of A and that A does not include such as, "the marks showing where Sergeyev

  2. What happened to the Romanov family?

    How far does the account in source A differ from those in sources B and C? Source A was written for an American newspaper. Judge Sergeyev (a supporter of the Provisional Government) gave most of the information used to write this source.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work