• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What Happened To the Romanov Family?

Extracts from this document...


What Happened To the Romanov Family? 1. (a) Sources A and B are both very similar, and in some ways these sources are reliable evidence, but in other ways these sources are not very reliable evidence. One way in which both of the accounts are reliable is that they both say that not all of the members of the Romanov family were killed. In fact in both accounts the same 5 people were mentioned as being murdered which show that this is likely to have happened. Another reason that the accounts may be reliable is because Judge Sergeyev wouldn't have had a motive in which to say that only 5 people were killed. This is because he was taking out an investigation on behalf of the whites, and if he would have had any bias it would have been towards the whole family being murdered by the Bolsheviks. A way in which the accounts are unreliable is that Judge Sergeyev's account is only taken from people who have spoken to him or who have read\d his report, so these people may not be telling the truth. Another reason is that Sir Charles Eliot seems very conclusive, and it doesn't seem like he is sure about what he was saying. ...read more.


This source is also unreliable though, as it was written by Judge Sokolov who was taking out an investigation on behalf of the whites, and he was a firm believer that the whole Romanov family were killed, and this could have had a bearing on his diagram. I think that source H is more reliable than source G because source g was drawn based on the investigation carried by the whites, which could have created a bias on the painting. As it is a painting it may also not be very accurate to the investigation due to human error, and it's not like a photograph which is 100% accurate. It also doesn't seem like the painting has much hard evidence, and I think that the artist drew this in order to convey the tsar as heroic as it shows him holding his son in his arms. I also think that source F wasn't as reliable as source H, because although it is a real picture, it has been taken by the whites and they could have easily doctored the photo to make it look like a massacre took place. Also, as the scene of the "murders" was under control by the whites at the time, they could have trashed the murder scene and make holes in the wall themselves in order to make it look like the whole family was killed. ...read more.


Although as with Sokolov's report, the newspaper does agree that the bodies were taken in a lorry and buried. I think the reason why Medvedev's comments disagreed with the newspaper article is because he was being tortured by the Whites, and therefore they could have manipulated him to say what they wanted him to hear. To conclude I think that the British newspaper report (source J) seemed to both compromise and confirm what was said in the other sources. It did seem to sum up the other sources as some of the verdicts were very different, i.e. the views of Sokolov and Sergeyev. I think this because it seemed to strike a balance between the 2 extremes of only the Tsar being killed, and the whole family being killed. This is because the report suggested that 5 members of the family were killed which is in the middle of Sokolov and Sergeyev's verdict. It is also between the 2 views of what happened after the murders took place, as Charles Eliot said, "No corpses were discovered, nor any trace of them being burned." Where Sokolov said, "The bodies were chopped in to pieces and burned with the aid of petrol and sulphuric acid." Source J goes in between again by saying that the bodies were buried in a bogged down swamp. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    The political instability caused by the Cultural Revolution had an enormous impact upon the economy of China. Recognising that a period of stability was required, Mao stepped back from the day-to-day administration, and Premier Zhou Enlai embarked upon the reconstruction of the economy.

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    Source E voices for itself in provisions of acceptance within Russia. The writer characterizes Stalin as a God-like man and how he is such as a martyr and a man of distinguished valor. The reason the author has written this is because he spent every day living in consternation that

  1. The fall of the Romanov Dynasty

    This source takes into account more public views, aristocratic views, influences of Rasputin on the Tsarina and so on. A textbook is used to describe the events of 1917 and how they where the last steps of the revolution. The people could take the starvation and oppression no longer.

  2. Stalin: Man or Monster - Sources Questions

    terror and executions were for defensive purposes of communism and Socialism as I believe that they were used for defensive purposes of himself. Khrushchev might be making this point in order to excuse Stalin, and more himself for the future.

  1. What happened to the Romanovs?

    Eight days after the bloodbath, the Whites captured Yekaterinburg. When they reached Ipatiev's house they saw bloodstains and bullet holes in the walls, but they could not find any evidence about the tsar's murder. It took months before the investigators could find anything of value.

  2. russia: what happened to the romanov family question 1 and 2

    However the information from the report comes from the Sergeyev, this mean the report was influenced by a white Russian.

  1. What happened to the Romanov Family

    Source B agrees on the people that were killed however he said "it is supposed" so he isn't sure. One extra thing on Sir Charles' report that wasn't in Source A is he mention surviving members of the royal family being seen in a train leaving Ekaterinburg on 17th July

  2. What Happened To The Romanovs

    However, as he was captured by the Whites, he was probably tortured and therefore his account is unreliable. I do not believe that Medvedev's evidence was correct because he has stated that he was told to go out into the street and see if anyone was there and if they will hear the shots.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work