• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What Happened To the Romanov Family?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What Happened To the Romanov Family? 1. (a) Sources A and B are both very similar, and in some ways these sources are reliable evidence, but in other ways these sources are not very reliable evidence. One way in which both of the accounts are reliable is that they both say that not all of the members of the Romanov family were killed. In fact in both accounts the same 5 people were mentioned as being murdered which show that this is likely to have happened. Another reason that the accounts may be reliable is because Judge Sergeyev wouldn't have had a motive in which to say that only 5 people were killed. This is because he was taking out an investigation on behalf of the whites, and if he would have had any bias it would have been towards the whole family being murdered by the Bolsheviks. A way in which the accounts are unreliable is that Judge Sergeyev's account is only taken from people who have spoken to him or who have read\d his report, so these people may not be telling the truth. Another reason is that Sir Charles Eliot seems very conclusive, and it doesn't seem like he is sure about what he was saying. ...read more.

Middle

This source is also unreliable though, as it was written by Judge Sokolov who was taking out an investigation on behalf of the whites, and he was a firm believer that the whole Romanov family were killed, and this could have had a bearing on his diagram. I think that source H is more reliable than source G because source g was drawn based on the investigation carried by the whites, which could have created a bias on the painting. As it is a painting it may also not be very accurate to the investigation due to human error, and it's not like a photograph which is 100% accurate. It also doesn't seem like the painting has much hard evidence, and I think that the artist drew this in order to convey the tsar as heroic as it shows him holding his son in his arms. I also think that source F wasn't as reliable as source H, because although it is a real picture, it has been taken by the whites and they could have easily doctored the photo to make it look like a massacre took place. Also, as the scene of the "murders" was under control by the whites at the time, they could have trashed the murder scene and make holes in the wall themselves in order to make it look like the whole family was killed. ...read more.

Conclusion

Although as with Sokolov's report, the newspaper does agree that the bodies were taken in a lorry and buried. I think the reason why Medvedev's comments disagreed with the newspaper article is because he was being tortured by the Whites, and therefore they could have manipulated him to say what they wanted him to hear. To conclude I think that the British newspaper report (source J) seemed to both compromise and confirm what was said in the other sources. It did seem to sum up the other sources as some of the verdicts were very different, i.e. the views of Sokolov and Sergeyev. I think this because it seemed to strike a balance between the 2 extremes of only the Tsar being killed, and the whole family being killed. This is because the report suggested that 5 members of the family were killed which is in the middle of Sokolov and Sergeyev's verdict. It is also between the 2 views of what happened after the murders took place, as Charles Eliot said, "No corpses were discovered, nor any trace of them being burned." Where Sokolov said, "The bodies were chopped in to pieces and burned with the aid of petrol and sulphuric acid." Source J goes in between again by saying that the bodies were buried in a bogged down swamp. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. What Happened To The Romanov Family

    Because the account came from someone that had been tortured, which means that he could have been forced to say something that supported the Whites. So he could be twisting the story. I also disagree that it is reliable, because although it is said to be an eyewitness account, a

  2. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    Many now regard Mao's call as a cynical attempt to expose and then attack critics of the government. In May 1957, an anti-rightist campaign began both within and outside the party. During the four-month period that followed, well over a half million intellectuals were labeled "rightists," forced to make public self-criticisms, and lost their jobs.

  1. Source A is a report from an American newspaper and it tells us that ...

    two servants and the maid were all shot in the Ipatiev house. Sources A and B are both interpretations of what Sergeyev said. It is not surprising that both sources give similar accounts since the source of information for both comes from the same person, (Judge Sergeyev.)

  2. Stalin: Man or Monster - Sources Questions

    Unfortunately I can not trust this assessment fully even though it seems to match up with my own knowledge as it is said by Khrushchev in a speech. We do not know to whom and for what purpose he was speaking for, for all we know he might have been

  1. What happened to the Romanovs?

    He said, "The sovereign walked ahead with their heir [Alexis]. In my presence there were no tears, no sobs, and no questions...the Empress sat down by the wall...behind her stood her three daughters. The Emperor was in the middle, net to the heir, and behind stood Dr Botkin...Eleven men walked

  2. russia: what happened to the romanov family question 1 and 2

    However the information from the report comes from the Sergeyev, this mean the report was influenced by a white Russian.

  1. What happened to the Romanov Family

    Source B agrees on the people that were killed however he said "it is supposed" so he isn't sure. One extra thing on Sir Charles' report that wasn't in Source A is he mention surviving members of the royal family being seen in a train leaving Ekaterinburg on 17th July

  2. What Happened To The Romanovs

    Two sources, A and C, say that the murders were committed on the lower floor and source B does not state anything as to the whereabouts of the events. Source C agrees with both of the other sources by saying that the murder was carried out using revolvers but then

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work