• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What happened to the Romanov family?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What happened to the Romanov family? 1. Sources A and B give similar accounts. Does this mean they are reliable? Source A is an extract from an American newspaper, which was written in December 1918. Since America was against Bolsheviks is it likely that source B's contents would be unreliable because it could be biased. Source B is a report to the British government written by Sir Charles Eliot, it was written in October 1918. Britain was also against the Bolsheviks. Judge Sergeyev influenced both sources. There is evidence in both of the sources to show this: source A 'Sergeyev took from his desk a large blue folder', source B 'Judge Sergeyev showed me over the house'. He was responsible for investigating what happened to the Romanov family; he was a supporter of the Provisional Government i.e. against Bolsheviks (the Reds). He was sacked in January 1919. He had reason to be biased and was obviously not trusted, so any information he gave is unreliable. To further discredit his information I read source C and compared it with A and that was written by his replacement 'Judge Sokolov' it gave a completely different account. The writers of both sources were from nations that opposed the Bolsheviks. ...read more.

Middle

Source D must be reliable because it is an eyewitness account. Do you agree? The notes from the interview of Pavel Medvedev (in charge of the men guarding the royal family). Pavel was being tortured so he and would be afraid that they may kill him if they found that he shot the Tsar. He would obviously want to hide the fact that the Tsar and his family might have escaped. The account that both Medvedev and his wife gave were different she says 'My husband fired to' this is not possible he says he was outside when he heard shots 'He walked out and heard shots'. In light of this I think that there is sufficient evidence to say that this eye witness account is unreliable. 4. Which of these sources is most useful to an historian studying the deaths of the Tsar and his family? Source F is a photograph of the basement where the murders were supposed to have taken place. It shows a wall and floor that look as if it has been damaged by gunfire. You can also see a closed door. To a historian this photograph might be useless because this damage has not necessarily been caused by gunfire; it might just be the house rotting away. ...read more.

Conclusion

Two of the imperial family's five children were missing when archaeologists opened a shallow burial pit near Ekaterinburg. This account is completely dissimilar from source C. This source says that the Tsar and his family where shot and finished off with bayonets. Then the corpses were taken away by lorry buried and the rest disposed of with sulphuric acid. Source B suggests that the 'surviving members of the royal family escaped on a train' Source D an eye witness account is certain that the entire royal family were killed. An example from source D 'walking into the room he saw al the members of the royal family lying on the floor'. In conclusion, source J confirms that the bodies were definitely moved and it is possible that two of the royal family escaped. We can be sure that the Royal Family was dead on arrival. This is shown by sources F and H. Source F is photograph showing damage caused by gun fire, source G is a painting of the death of the Tsar based on the investigation carried out by the whites and source H is a diagram show the positions of people the basement according to witness interviewed by Judge Sokolov. The bodies in these sources were positively identified in source J, however there were two children missing. We cannot be certain as to whether all the royal family were killed. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Stalin Sources Questions

    Stalin used his own police force, the NKVB, to gather those who were up for trial. The most famous "show trial" was that of Bukharin. Sources I and J are very truthful. They both show that Stalin gave ultimatums to those who were staring in the eyes of death.

  2. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    The chairman of the Communist Party was Mao Zedong. Two days before the People's Republic of China was announced, Communist Party leaders drew up a common programme that outlined the Party's aims and intentions such as independence, democracy, peace, unity and prosperity. All sorts of problems got in the way of reaching these targets.

  1. What caused the Romanov Dynasty to fall? Explain the fall and decline of the ...

    The day ended with 1000 deaths and many more casualties. The day went down in history as the Bloody Sunday. It began the revolution of 1905 and the image of the tsar as 'little father' gave away to a view of him as 'Bloody Nicholas'.

  2. What happened to the Romanovs?

    He said, "The sovereign walked ahead with their heir [Alexis]. In my presence there were no tears, no sobs, and no questions...the Empress sat down by the wall...behind her stood her three daughters. The Emperor was in the middle, net to the heir, and behind stood Dr Botkin...Eleven men walked

  1. Which of these Sources is most useful to an Historian studying the deaths of ...

    he cannot actually see their murder or even their corpses. Therefore there is no evidence from the picture that the Tsar and his family were actually even murdered here, it is only "claimed" to be so. This source G is unreliable as it is based on Source D which is

  2. russia: what happened to the romanov family question 1 and 2

    This contradicts Sir Charles Eliot's report, as he says "on 17 July, a train left Ekaterinburg and it is believed that the surviving members of the royal family were in it."[source B] The date however, does agree with source C, as Sokolov states the murders occurred between the 17th and 21st.

  1. What Happened To The Romanovs

    goes into much more detail and also claims that bayonets were used to finish off some of the victims. Sokolov claimed that more than 30 shots were fired and that several people had to have been murdered as one person would not be able to change their body position so many times and submit to so many shots.

  2. What Happened To The Romanov Family

    'The murder was carried out using revolvers and bayonets.' If Sergeyev knew this information, why did it take so long for it to be released? The report also says that 'It is demonstrated that between the 17 and 22 July a murder occurred in the house.' Does this mean that the murders took place on different days, the Tsar

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work