• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What happened to the Romanov family?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What happened to the Romanov family? 1. Sources A and B give similar accounts. Does this mean they are reliable? Source A is an extract from an American newspaper, which was written in December 1918. Since America was against Bolsheviks is it likely that source B's contents would be unreliable because it could be biased. Source B is a report to the British government written by Sir Charles Eliot, it was written in October 1918. Britain was also against the Bolsheviks. Judge Sergeyev influenced both sources. There is evidence in both of the sources to show this: source A 'Sergeyev took from his desk a large blue folder', source B 'Judge Sergeyev showed me over the house'. He was responsible for investigating what happened to the Romanov family; he was a supporter of the Provisional Government i.e. against Bolsheviks (the Reds). He was sacked in January 1919. He had reason to be biased and was obviously not trusted, so any information he gave is unreliable. To further discredit his information I read source C and compared it with A and that was written by his replacement 'Judge Sokolov' it gave a completely different account. The writers of both sources were from nations that opposed the Bolsheviks. ...read more.

Middle

Source D must be reliable because it is an eyewitness account. Do you agree? The notes from the interview of Pavel Medvedev (in charge of the men guarding the royal family). Pavel was being tortured so he and would be afraid that they may kill him if they found that he shot the Tsar. He would obviously want to hide the fact that the Tsar and his family might have escaped. The account that both Medvedev and his wife gave were different she says 'My husband fired to' this is not possible he says he was outside when he heard shots 'He walked out and heard shots'. In light of this I think that there is sufficient evidence to say that this eye witness account is unreliable. 4. Which of these sources is most useful to an historian studying the deaths of the Tsar and his family? Source F is a photograph of the basement where the murders were supposed to have taken place. It shows a wall and floor that look as if it has been damaged by gunfire. You can also see a closed door. To a historian this photograph might be useless because this damage has not necessarily been caused by gunfire; it might just be the house rotting away. ...read more.

Conclusion

Two of the imperial family's five children were missing when archaeologists opened a shallow burial pit near Ekaterinburg. This account is completely dissimilar from source C. This source says that the Tsar and his family where shot and finished off with bayonets. Then the corpses were taken away by lorry buried and the rest disposed of with sulphuric acid. Source B suggests that the 'surviving members of the royal family escaped on a train' Source D an eye witness account is certain that the entire royal family were killed. An example from source D 'walking into the room he saw al the members of the royal family lying on the floor'. In conclusion, source J confirms that the bodies were definitely moved and it is possible that two of the royal family escaped. We can be sure that the Royal Family was dead on arrival. This is shown by sources F and H. Source F is photograph showing damage caused by gun fire, source G is a painting of the death of the Tsar based on the investigation carried out by the whites and source H is a diagram show the positions of people the basement according to witness interviewed by Judge Sokolov. The bodies in these sources were positively identified in source J, however there were two children missing. We cannot be certain as to whether all the royal family were killed. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    At the Tenth Plenum of the Eighth CCP Central Committee held in October 1962, Mao advanced the slogan, "Never forget class, class contradictions, and class struggle," and began an all-out "socialist education movement" in the rural areas beginning in 1963.

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    The immediate response one may have towards this speech is that Krushchev is attacking Stalin and his policies, however there is another interpretation that Krushchev did agree with some of Stalin's policies by later explaining in his speech how Stalin perceived his deeds to be in the best interests of his party and his mass plethora of supporters.

  1. Which of these Sources is most useful to an Historian studying the deaths of ...

    his source does not make clear exactly who died, and whether some of the family survived or not.

  2. What happened to the Romanov family? - Study Sources A and B. Sources A ...

    The corpses were taken out to the lorry." As well as Source E which mentions, "they killed them all". For that reason, I believe the disagreement of Sources A and B with other sources creates an impression that there are obvious elements of unreliability and biass in Sources A and B.

  1. What happened to the Romanov Family? - Sources A and B give similar accounts. ...

    A and B that the Romanovs were executed in the lower floors of Ipatiev house; however this is not to say that these sources all agree entirely with sources A and B in the minutiae of the accounts they give.

  2. Stalin: Man or Monster - Sources Questions

    This makes it less reliable as we can not be at all sure whether the man means it and says what he thinks is the truth. However, on the other hand we can not exclude a possibility that the source could hold some truth in it.

  1. What Happened To The Romanov Family?

    suggests the sources are not that reliable and that just because they are similar to an extent it does not mean they have to be reliable. Both sources very in a large amount and the fact that they are both constructed using Sergeyev's comments, a poor source in terms of

  2. What Happened To the Romanov Family?

    is the verdict Sokolov gives that all of the Romanov family were killed. This is different because Sergeyev came to the conclusion that only 5 people were killed, and that the people were the tsar, the doctor, 2 servants and a maid.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work