• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What Happened To The Romanov Family?

Extracts from this document...


What Happened To The Romanov Family? Question A Source A is a report from an American newspaper dated December 1918. It tells us an account of what Judge Sergeyev did while investigating the house and what he found. Source B is from Sir Charles Eliot's report to the British government, dated October 1918. He was sent by the British government to find out what had happened and this source is his account of his findings. When studying sources A and B, they both give similar accounts to what happened. These similarities in turn show the reliability of the sources. First and foremost, both sources are from the same source person which is Judge Sergeyev, this meaning that the source is reliable in the fact that both include Judge Sergeyev's findings. Another similarity is the number of victims there supposedly was. They both agree that there were five; the Tsar, Dr Botkin, the empress's maid and two servants. This is the only point that both sources agree on. The differences between the Sources A and B will in turn show how the sources are not reliable. Firstly, source A is written by an American newspaper. At the time the Americans were strongly against the Bolsheviks and therefore anti-red. Source B is written by Sir Charles Eliot whom is on the 'White' side as he is British. ...read more.


This is completely different to what the American newspaper reports on in source A as they state that only five people were murdered in the house. They even based their reports on Sergeyev's findings. Source B also states the same five people in source A being murdered; consequently this is a major difference. Source C also states the dates "17 and 22 July" as to when Sokolov believed that the crime took place - in between those days. Source B does not mention a date but does state that on 17 July, a train left Ekaterinbuurg...surviving members of the royal family were in it." This suggests that Sir Charles Eliot believed that the murder took place before these dates, hence the difference. Source C also states that "revolvers and bayonets" were used to carry out the murder whereas sources A and B do no mention weapons but do mention the fact that the family was "shot." This suggests that Judge Sokolov discovered new evidence to what had been used as the murder weapon, something the other sources do not pick up on. There is additional information to support this theory as Sokolov suggests that "more that thirty shots were fired because some of the bullets must have remained in the bodies. Sokolov further explains that on 17 July "a lorry carried the corpses to the four brothers' mine." ...read more.


When analysing source E there are no similarities to that of source D. With source E being from an extract from a History book using Medvedev's wife's comments, we can see there are many differences. Firstly there is a mention of "a paper was read to them that said, "the revolution is dying and so shall you." There is no mention of this in source D. His wife also says "My husband fired too" in response to the shootings while Medvedev clearly states that he was outside when the shootings took place. This continues as the source states that Medvedev told a guard he'd "emptied two or three bullets into the Tsar" which further implies his guilt, his lies and also shows how source E is completely different to what source D states. In conclusion, I do not agree that since source D is an eyewitness account it must be reliable. This is because source E, taken from Medvedev's own wife's words are the opposite of what source D and Medvedev state. Furthermore, source D includes many suspicious factors such as Medvedev being told to see if he could hear the shots outside. Other sources such as A do not agree with source D on some points either in relation to the number of victims which means that even though it is an eye witness account, source D does not have to be and in this case is not really reliable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Stalin Sources Questions

    His use of "striking propaganda" at this time would have been received as "Gospel" by the Russian people because they were so afraid of Stalin that they would have believed anything that he would have said. In all truthfullness Source D is a contradiction in itself.

  2. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    Mao saw this as the negative effects of capitalism. He would like the Chinese people to live simple lives and come back to be a true communist. However, this positive intension due to Mao's cult drove the country to a complete chaos and in a totalitarian state. His main intension was not to establish himself with total power but he just aimed to regain some of his power back.

  1. Stalin - Source based work

    Both source G and source H. were written by Khrushchev in 1956. He had taken over as premier of the USSR in 1955 two years after Stalin's death in 1953 following a struggle for power.

  2. What Happened To The Romanov Family

    and could be trying to build up a strong answer for what happened at Ipatiev House. I would personally say that Source H is most useful to a historian, solely because it uses eyewitness accounts to create a diagram, and it was also published in a book.

  1. Source A is a report from an American newspaper and it tells us that ...

    Source A and B are similar in that the information in both originate from Sergeyev. The sources are different in that Source B is more unbiased than Source A. I think the sources are both reliable as both suggest that the entire Romanov family was not killed.

  2. Study Source A : Source A must be trustworthy because it is an eyewitness ...

    All the children have lean and unhappy faces, and the two naked children have exposed ribs and very thin limbs which suggest food deprivation. The Russian production figures compiled by R Wolfson may provide a reason for this in the huge 54% decline in the production of grain in the years between 1913 and 1921.

  1. Russia's sense of uniqueness

    -Bit of a westerner. -Spent his time in exile in New York, others in Siberia. * Political mistakes-attacked Z&K over hesitation in 1917therefore turned on him. -He does not use Lenin's testament against Stalin!?!? (Explanations 1) likeable character-doesn't want to get involved in in fighting or arrogance.

  2. Stalin - Man or Monster? - Sources Questions

    The aim of these plans was to modernise Russia from a backward peasant society into a modern industrial state, which was able to withstand the threat of any future foreign invasion. One of the targets that Stalin set was for the amount of electricity produced to increase to 22 million kilowatts.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work