• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What Happened To The Romanov Family?

Extracts from this document...


What Happened To The Romanov Family? Question A Source A is a report from an American newspaper dated December 1918. It tells us an account of what Judge Sergeyev did while investigating the house and what he found. Source B is from Sir Charles Eliot's report to the British government, dated October 1918. He was sent by the British government to find out what had happened and this source is his account of his findings. When studying sources A and B, they both give similar accounts to what happened. These similarities in turn show the reliability of the sources. First and foremost, both sources are from the same source person which is Judge Sergeyev, this meaning that the source is reliable in the fact that both include Judge Sergeyev's findings. Another similarity is the number of victims there supposedly was. They both agree that there were five; the Tsar, Dr Botkin, the empress's maid and two servants. This is the only point that both sources agree on. The differences between the Sources A and B will in turn show how the sources are not reliable. Firstly, source A is written by an American newspaper. At the time the Americans were strongly against the Bolsheviks and therefore anti-red. Source B is written by Sir Charles Eliot whom is on the 'White' side as he is British. ...read more.


This is completely different to what the American newspaper reports on in source A as they state that only five people were murdered in the house. They even based their reports on Sergeyev's findings. Source B also states the same five people in source A being murdered; consequently this is a major difference. Source C also states the dates "17 and 22 July" as to when Sokolov believed that the crime took place - in between those days. Source B does not mention a date but does state that on 17 July, a train left Ekaterinbuurg...surviving members of the royal family were in it." This suggests that Sir Charles Eliot believed that the murder took place before these dates, hence the difference. Source C also states that "revolvers and bayonets" were used to carry out the murder whereas sources A and B do no mention weapons but do mention the fact that the family was "shot." This suggests that Judge Sokolov discovered new evidence to what had been used as the murder weapon, something the other sources do not pick up on. There is additional information to support this theory as Sokolov suggests that "more that thirty shots were fired because some of the bullets must have remained in the bodies. Sokolov further explains that on 17 July "a lorry carried the corpses to the four brothers' mine." ...read more.


When analysing source E there are no similarities to that of source D. With source E being from an extract from a History book using Medvedev's wife's comments, we can see there are many differences. Firstly there is a mention of "a paper was read to them that said, "the revolution is dying and so shall you." There is no mention of this in source D. His wife also says "My husband fired too" in response to the shootings while Medvedev clearly states that he was outside when the shootings took place. This continues as the source states that Medvedev told a guard he'd "emptied two or three bullets into the Tsar" which further implies his guilt, his lies and also shows how source E is completely different to what source D states. In conclusion, I do not agree that since source D is an eyewitness account it must be reliable. This is because source E, taken from Medvedev's own wife's words are the opposite of what source D and Medvedev state. Furthermore, source D includes many suspicious factors such as Medvedev being told to see if he could hear the shots outside. Other sources such as A do not agree with source D on some points either in relation to the number of victims which means that even though it is an eye witness account, source D does not have to be and in this case is not really reliable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    One of the first post-1949 ideological movements began with the Korean War in 1950, when anti-U.S. and pro-North Korea propaganda was used to mobilize support for the war. Always suspicious of their support for the communist revolution, Mao regularly launched fierce attacks against intellectuals.

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    on Trotsky's former position and trying to gain control of the U.S.S.R's most indespensible asset, it's army. Question2 Source D was written by Stalin in 1945. Immediately, we know that the source was biased to him and that he will try to justify something within it. This is very true.

  1. What happened to the Romanov family? - Study Sources A and B. Sources A ...

    The corpses were taken out to the lorry." As well as Source E which mentions, "they killed them all". For that reason, I believe the disagreement of Sources A and B with other sources creates an impression that there are obvious elements of unreliability and biass in Sources A and B.

  2. What happened to the Romanov Family? - Sources A and B give similar accounts. ...

    could easily have had the information presented in his report never published if it was seen to damage their cause against the Bolsheviks. This could make source B more reliable, and as such source A would also seem more reliable since the information it presents is very similar to that which is presented in source B.

  1. Russia's sense of uniqueness

    -Bit of a westerner. -Spent his time in exile in New York, others in Siberia. * Political mistakes-attacked Z&K over hesitation in 1917therefore turned on him. -He does not use Lenin's testament against Stalin!?!? (Explanations 1) likeable character-doesn't want to get involved in in fighting or arrogance.

  2. Study Source A : Source A must be trustworthy because it is an eyewitness ...

    It is known that farm production suffered owing to farmhands leaving for cities and also enlisting as soldiers. Further, it is known that the Russian war machine was hampered by poor supplies. The war created severe hardships, many fatherless families, which the photograph may perhaps suggest, and reduced markets as it dragged on.

  1. Stalin Souurces Questions

    Also shows that his five-year plan has worked. If you look at the part of the painting that shows Stalin is standing with the workers we can see again that Stalin again is standing out, he is right in the middle of the picture showing his importance yet again.

  2. Stalin: Man or Monster - Sources Questions

    Even though this source is mainly a story with a moral in it, told by Stalin probably for propaganda usage it does provide some useful evidence about Stalin and the type of a man he was. Based on this source, one can assume that Stalin was a paranoid man; constantly

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work