• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What Happened To The Romanov Family?

Extracts from this document...


GCSE History Coursework: What Happened To The Romanov Family? A Source A is a secondary source because it is a report from an American newspaper. It states that Sergeyev has all the evidence, but I think that this is false about what happened to the family as it is not reliable in a sense that the report may come from other people's opinions. He was to examine the lower story of the building which was where the royal family lived and were to be murdered. But he does say that he doesn't believe all the members of the family were killed. Source B was a British report in which they had sent a British representative to investigate the murder entry to the Romanov family. They only wished to receive the truth and not to gain the Support of the Germans, they were unlike the reds. This is why they had sent Sir Charles Elliot because he had no need to lie. In this sense I think the source is reliable. However the information comes from Sergeyev whom is a white so some of the information may be biased. The similarities between source A and B are: 1. Judge Sergeyev was involved in investigating both sources A and B: judge Sergeyev was the investigator within both the sources. However in source B he was showing Sir Charles Elliot around the house. In both the sources Sergeyev was examining the buildings in which the Romanov's were killed. Both the sources were reports by whites, the American newspapers and Sir Charles Elliot. On the other hand in source A states at the bottom of the source that Judge Sergeyev was sacked this might have occurred because the information was not reliable, indirect or even too reliable that some of the evidence which had found had to be censored. However source B was written before source A and was also a report by the whites but he was not sacked by the British government. ...read more.


Once he had entered the room he saw Tsar and his family lying on the floor. So if he was not their this could mean that this is not possibly true that the family were killed, so some evidence could be biased on other peoples opinions or it could be censored. This source also matches with source H as it shows the families positions of how they were going to be executed. Source H was Sokolovs diagram. He drew it according to a witness which he had interviewed for example a white. This could be biased because as a historian we don't know who took the interview. Although Sokolovs diagram does show the right number of the Romanov family and their servants and the right number of guards. Source E talks about Medvedev's wife and her view points on how the family were murdered. She tells us a different story to her husbands. She says that they were led downstairs and read a letter. She says that they started firing as did Medvedev. He emptied 2 - 3 bullets into Tsar. This statement suggests an act of revenge. She also says in the closing paragraph that her husband was stupid what he told one of the guards. This stated that he was guilty party. In conclusion I think that source D is reliable. This is because it was an eyewitness account so to a historian as me it is a primary source. Also the whites shot him; I think this is because he gave too much information so this could be reliable to the reds. However I do not think that Source D is more reliable than source E because source C is not biased in a sense it was from a red and white sided person. So this gives two viewpoints which more reliable than an interview. D Source F is a photograph of the basement room where the murder had claimed to have taken place. ...read more.


However the mine didn't collapse and the bodies were put into the lorry and then the lorry was bogged down. Sources D and J Similarly sources D and J state that the shooting had occurred in the room. Source D says that all the members of the family were shot. The bodies were found lying on the floor of the room by Pavel Medvedev whom was the eyewitness guard. However source J states that only a few members of the family was shot. They also both sate that the corpses were transported by lorry. D doesn't give enough detail to where the bodies were taken and what was done with them. However source J does state this information. Sources E and J The similarity with both of these sources is the murder of the entire Romanov family, who were eventually shot. It doesn't state anything to where the bodies were taken and what was done to them. Sources G and J Both of these sources state that the shooting took place. These are two different types of sources. G is a photograph and J is a newspaper article. In the photo (source G) it shows that Tsar is being shot whilst his son is holding him. However the source doesn't give evidence that others where shot with/without him. Source J Source J is recent evidence as it is from a British newspaper in December 1994. This is why that they could be sure that Tsar, his wife and daughters were killed due to DNA tests along with the dental records. Conclusion In conclusion I think that Tsar, his wife and daughters were shot as it was recommended by other sources which I have studied as a historian. Also due to DNA records which are the most recent evidence to date this would be very useful. So I agree with source J and source C. Another thing which I would like to add is that the bodies could not be entirely destroyed by fir because to destroy the bones of the victims a very high temperature is needed. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. What Happened To The Romanov Family

    Which in some ways relates to source I, and maybe the fact that they weren't all killed together. 3) Source D is not necessarily reliable just because it is an eyewitness account.

  2. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    As source D portrays Mao's Cultural Revolution propaganda of the Red Guards smashing Mao's opponent. Throughout the country, revolutionary committees sprang up, taking power from the local government and party authorities. The scale and effects of the Cultural Revolution were frightening.

  1. Stalin - Source based work

    Although it is reliable as a primary source in the sense that it appeared in a published newspaper of the time, that newspaper was controlled by the communist party who could choose to publish what they wanted to suit their own viewpoint.

  2. Source A is a report from an American newspaper and it tells us that ...

    This again proves that Sir Charles Elliot was not committing himself; instead, he was just reporting what people thought. As Source B was reported by someone sent by the British government and the British only wished to find out the truth, not gain support so Sir Charles Eliot had no reason to lie.

  1. Study Source A : Source A must be trustworthy because it is an eyewitness ...

    The fact that grain production did not decline as sharply suggests that people still had to eat, even if there was less to go round, but people could go without more clothes and so on. Given the years 1913 and 1921 it is tempting to conclude that the suggested famine and decline in markets is owing to 'War Communism'.

  2. Russia's sense of uniqueness

    Early political career- * @school he was attracted by political ideas. * Skipped school -became involved in the Georgian resistance movement which was agitating against Tsarist control (1988 expelled) * Anti-government activities drew him into the Social Democratic workers party-Marxist party- Alan wood-"temperamentally and intuitively (Stalin was)

  1. Stalin: Man or Monster - Sources Questions

    Stalin was a strong man, this I think is quite true as you have to be strong to remain a leader of such a huge country till you die, and achieve what he did. Other single details in this source are also true such as the name carving on machines

  2. What happened to the Romanovs?

    They had to be finished off by stabbing them to death. The massacre was complete and the entire Romanov family was slaughtered. In an interview with Pavel Medvedev, these described events are supported. He was a Red Guard commander and this is the only eye-witness account from 1919.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work