• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What impression of kristallnacht does source C

Extracts from this document...


Question B What impression of kristallnacht does source C give? Source C is an account by David Buffman, a member of the American embassy in Leipzig. He wrote his account at the time of kristallnacht, which was on the 10th of November 1938, from what he had seen and interviews which he carried out. From this source we get the impression that it was the Nazis who organised kristallnacht and that the SS men and stormtroopers, who were not in uniform and armed with axes hammers and fire bombs, started to attack and torch Jewish homes, shops and synagogues. As it was the Nazis who carried out the attacks, it was most likely that it would have been Hitler and his associates who plotted kristallnacht, the night of broken glass. ...read more.


Nethertheless, David Buffman was a worker for the American Embassy, and at the time they were no feuds between Germany and America, so why would he lie? This means that we have no reason to believe the evidence is untrue. David based his account on what he saw, and tells us of the violence that the Nazis used. We have to take into account that he is telling us what he saw, so he could have been biased towards the Jewish community. But yet again he had no reason to be biased towards them. You could argue that the source creates a sympathetic picture for the Jews, as they were the innocent victims. ...read more.


We know because he says "when viewing the ruins and the violence, all of the local crowds were horrified by the Nazis' acts". Despite their anger, the German public could do nothing because if any sympathy was shown towards the Jews by the German public, they had the problem of the Nazis, as the Nazis hated the Jews. We know this as he says "the slightest sign of sympathy for the Jews from the public caused fury amongst the Nazis" Overall the source gives us the impression that the Nazis were horrible people, and that they organised kristallnacht, the night of broken glass. I feel that the source is reliable as David had nothing to lie about, but it would have been better if he had told us the name of his reliable source so we could check on it. 1 Connor Richardson ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    Source G supports ii), as it claims Ernst, leader of the SA, and 'two SA men set fire to the Reichstag', and says that they 'used Van der Lubbe. He would climb into the Reichstag and blunder about while we set fire to the building'.

  2. Source Investigation: Why did Kristallnacht take place?

    The image presented in Source G clearly disagrees with the above quote, as it presents the German people as powerless in the current circumstances, represented by an innocent woman, vulnerable in the midst of the corruption surrounding her. It contradicts the above claim to the extent that it even identifies

  1. Why Did Kristallnacht Take Place? (a) A ...

    Both cartoons depict the Nazis standing over victims- triumphant, but the messages are different. Source G shows how the innocent Germans are helpless to intervene with the Nazis, whilst Source F conveys a moral concept- that killing Jews does not boost ones popularity.

  2. What impression of 'Kristallnacht' does source c give? Explain your answer.

    It tells us that the Nazi police supplied the SA and SS with axes, house-breaking tools, ladders and a list of the addresses of all the Jewish residents and shops. Source E is reliable as it is signed "a civil servant" and therefore is anonymous.

  1. Why did Kristallnacht take place? Source based work.

    Overall, I think that Source D and Source E make it more likely that the account given in Source C is accurate as, like before, certain factors link up. For example, Source D comments on the build up of Kristallnacht and Source E supports the idea that the SS and SA had intervened with Kristallnacht.

  2. Holocaust - Source related questions.

    Within Germany, opposition to Hitler was predominately by two different groups. The first comprised those individuals who felt a moral or philosophical objection to the Nazi state and thus defied it openly or passively.

  1. What was the main cause of Kristallnacht?

    It could also demonstrate a combination of the two. The burning and destruction occurring in the background and the murder victim between the soldier's legs show that attacks are violent. The fact that the woman is sitting down out of view of the Nazis shows that the Nazis are not

  2. Nazi Germany - Why did Kristallnacht take place? Source based work.

    This impression is given because the source mentions that they had been "provided with hammers, axes and firebombs" And so it would seems obvious that they caused the destruction. The source also tells the official view from the Nazis was that Kristallnacht was a spontaneous impulse created by the German

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work