• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What impressions might a spectator in Roman times have registered on approaching, entering and settling down inside the Colosseum? How would structural and decorative features have contributed to any such impressions?

Extracts from this document...


TMA 03 PART 1 -Short Answer What impressions might a spectator in Roman times have registered on approaching, entering and settling down inside the Colosseum? How would structural and decorative features have contributed to any such impressions? On approaching the colosseum, a spectator in Roman times would have been overwhelmed by its sheer size and beauty as it stood against the skyline perhaps higher than any other building in close proximity. The roar of over 45, 000 people would have greeted them as they neared. Upon entering, the spectator would have been amazed at the sheer volume of the people the space could accommodate as well as the different safety and comfort features. The architects took into account not only the appearance but the firmness and function of the colosseum. The clever architecture meant that every spectator had an unimpeded view of the arena and of the emperor's reactions to the proceedings. Seats, corridors and stairs were planned in order to allow the public easy access and exit and to keep the different social classes separated. The strict social segregation meant that the two main entrances led directly to the central boxes where the emperor and senators would sit while a series of other pathways led the other spectators to their designated seats. ...read more.


During peace times, gladiatorial games or combat became the way in which men showed their strength and military values. This coincides with the way in which modern day armies perform military maneuvers or mock battles. Another issue which we in the 21st century would find difficult to comprehend would be the concept of upper classes using their slaves in games. Slavery in modern day is hard enough to comprehend. For the Romans it was not an issue of who had the most expensive car or designer clothes, it was whose slaves won the victory in gladiatorial fights. When captives were pitted against each other with the prize being their life, it is fully understandable why one would fight to the death. The Roman leaders saw this as a way to entertain as well as punish slaves, captives and locals for their crimes. For them it was a judiciary event as well as entertainment. The fights also served the purpose of reiterating the power of the Romans over their captured enemies. Pliny's Panegyric xxxi states that the emperor gave the citizens 'public entertainment, nothing lax or dissolute to weaken and destroy the manly spirits of his subjects, but one to inspire them to face honourable wounds and look scornfully upon death by demonstrating a love of glory and a desire for victory even in the persons of criminals and slaves'. ...read more.


Cicero, who condemned gladiatorial games, states ' a gladiatorial show is apt to seem cruel and brutal to some eyes, and I incline to think that it is, as now conducted, but in the days when it was criminals who crossed swords in the death struggle, there could be no better schooling against pain and death. One writer believes that the games became a common denominator amongst all the conquered people in the Mediterranean area. As they came from different cultural backgrounds, this was the one pastime which they had in common. What I believe to be most interesting about the Romans was that for a moment, the common folk had the ultimate power to save or destroy a life in the ring. For most, this was the only opportunity to be a part of the decision making process. In conclusion, I feel that while some people of the 21 century understand the Roman way of life, there are some who will form an opinion judging them by today' standards without fully understanding or studying the culture ethics and morals of the time. Each society has a set of norms and traditions and the Romans were no different. For them, the colosseum and its events served the purpose of uniting the people against the common foes of lawlessness and blasphemy and gave them a sense of unity. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Tudor Architecture

    --> How did the architecture change and develop and why? How and when did the styles change at different points between 1500 -1750? To answer these questions it is necessary to give a brief history of the development of architecture up to the 1500's Pre 1500's Rome had an enormous impact on Britain and we still feel its impact today.

  2. Walcott depicts himself as "the mulatto of style" in "What the Twilight Says: An ...

    He wrote. "something prickles in me when I see the word Ashanti as with the word Warwickshire, both separately intimating my grandfathers' roots both baptizing this neither proud nor ashamed bastard, this hybrid, this West Indian."�. Walcott establishes that no matter what the mix he is West Indian.

  1. How does the Verulamium site enable modern historians to understand and explain life in ...

    to help the process of making something. To make the tools they would also have needed a high level of engineering. At Verulamium there were many grand mosaics on show and these mosaics took great skill to make. The time and effort needed to produce a large mosaic would have been immense.

  2. What was a chariot racing day like for the spectators and drivers in Roman ...

    He couldn't understand the appeal of the circus. 'Chariot races but I am not the least bit interested in that kind of entertainment.' He explains his point of view by saying 'There's never anything new or different.' He's amazed by the amount of people who watch it and thinks those people are childish.

  1. What impressions do you receive from this passage of the four English characters involved? ...

    Ronny in the extract behaves like this in his unwarranted prejudices against Godbole and Aziz, almost as though considering them sub-human in his reference to Fielding's having left Adela "alone". The fact that he, as does most of the Club, refers to Indians usually as a race rather than as

  2. How do Roman fish sauces compare with sauces today?

    Liquamen was produced in factories, as bottles have been found (one from Pompeii reads "Best strained liquamen. From the factory of Umbricus Agathopus.) Lepcis Magna and Pompeii were both major liquamen-producing centres. The first three recipes are for mass-produced garum.

  1. Analyse various representations of Arthur, from the earliest times to recent scholarship.

    Nennius portrayal; as such, heroic descriptions of the figure such as 'the great slaughter of them [Pagans]'11 may well have been exaggerated in order to portray this desired figure, and hence may be historically inaccurate descriptions of Arthur. Nennius was also influenced by Christianity, this caused him to incorporate Christian teachings in his Arthurian story.

  2. Would a "day out" to the Circus Maximus be more enjoyable than to the ...

    Then there was the encouraging aspect of the canvas that blocked the sun from the spectators, which must have drawn a crowd when being used.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work