• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is History?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Toni Pilbrow 23/10/03 What is History? The 'Concise Oxford English Dictionary' defines history thus: (1), 'The study of past events'. (2), 'The past considered as a whole; the whole series of past events connected with someone or something, an eventful past'. (3), 'A continuous, typically chronological, record of past events or trends'.1 As neat as the above definitions are, they do not go near a comprehensive definition of the discipline. Indeed, historians today and for many years in the past, appear to have been at loggerheads over this and many other questions, including whether or not history can be considered a science. Professor Jeremy Black, in his recent lecture on this subject stated that there is no individual (single) way of studying history; and that no particular part of history is superior to any other. He said that history has two meanings and that these meanings are, "what happened in the past" and, "what the meaning is of what happened in the past."2 Since the past cannot be repeated, unlike a scientific experiment, it is difficult to see how history can be regarded as a science; and while ...read more.

Middle

It was not until the 17th century that this way of thinking or "mindset" began to change due to the influence of the new sciences. From the mid 17th century, the idea of a linear chronology gained ground amongst historians and other thinkers of the age. The mass literacy that occurred during the 19th century confirmed the shift to a linear way of thinking history and the perception that life moves forward; for example, the year 1950 is not the same as 2000 and never could be; the past is dead and its influence on people is not as strong as if it was going to recur. Therefore the last 250 years, characterised as it is by an ever-increasing urbanisation and industrialisation, has led to the situation where we are all linear historicists.3 Assuming that the linear view of history is the correct one, what then is the difference between the past and history? It is that the past is dead and gone; it does not exist except in the memories of people that were alive in a particular time and are still alive, or in documents, artefacts and other surviving physical traces of an historical period. ...read more.

Conclusion

Nevertheless, it could be argued that although these programmes present history in a way that appeals to the "lowest common denominator" (i.e. plenty of breadth, but not much analysis of causes etc.) they are much better than no history at all and ultimately may increase academic influence by virtue of a likely increase in the numbers of people moved to take up formal advanced study of the discipline. In conclusion, E.H.Carr's assertion that historians and historical "facts" interact to create a dialogue is probably close to the mark in defining what history is. He also wrote: 'History begins when men begin to think of the passage of time in terms not of natural processes --- the cycle of the seasons, the human life-span --- but of a series of specific events in which men are consciously involved and which they can consciously influence."4 1 Concise Oxford Dictionary, 2002. 2 Prof. Jeremy Black, University of Exeter lecture, 10/10/2003. 3 Prof. Jeremy Black, University of Exeter lecture, 10/10/2003. 4 Carr, E.H., What Is History, p 129. Palgrave 2001. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. History Extension Major Work- The 1932-33 Bodyline Series

    there aim of "curbing the run-getting activities of Bradman"29 Larwood's reply was - "as far as we [the English cricket team] are concerned it [fast leg theory] did fail"30, this was later backed up when he said "he still averaged 56 which is not bad for a test"31.

  2. Does Hegel's Perception of the World History Mean More Than Just a Popular Quotation?

    Hence, the dialectical process is what the history means for Hegel, i.e. Hegel recognized that not all historical events or facts would be identifiable through the dialectic Hegel recognized that not all historical events or facts would be identifiable through the dialectic.

  1. De Bernieres describes History as 'Hearsay tempered with myth and hazy memory.' How does ...

    in reference to their involvement with the Italians when their former allies turned on them during 1943. According to de Berniļæ½res, it is "certain" that the "communist andartes of ELAS took no part, seeing no reason to shake themselves out of their parasitic lethargy".

  2. Discuss whether History can be subjective

    British history would have us believe that 'one size fits all', that we all have the same beliefs and opinions. This is not the case; our history has been selected for us to represent a specific white, middle class group of individuals and does not give us the full picture.

  1. Consider the treatment of history in Julian Barnes's A History of The World in ...

    When fabulated history is something that governs people's lives then fiction becomes reality and reality is modelled on fiction. Perhaps this is what Barnes means when, in chapter seven, he says, 'Myth will become reality, however sceptical we might be.'

  2. Question 3 History

    Some men hated the women altogether. "Males were vulnerable to conscription" suggests that the women worked so hard, and in some cases better than the men, that men would be pushed out of the job when war was over. Where they really putting the males out of the job?

  1. From a close study of E.M.Forster's "A Passage to India" and Julian Barnes' "A ...

    Forster dealt with Indian society, based upon two visits he made in 1912 and 1921. He concentrates on India itself with the narrative being set 'out of time', with only the seasons mattering. The novel itself has not been written as a political tract but as an examination of characters with official rein from the perspective of moral judgement.

  2. The Impact of Women's History On the Mainstream study of history.

    there was very little time to actually find the time to write after the family duties were complete. Life duties for women were paramount and had to be put first before another duties. Family life and everything that came with it was the utmost important feature in the lives of Victorian women.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work