• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is History?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Toni Pilbrow 23/10/03 What is History? The 'Concise Oxford English Dictionary' defines history thus: (1), 'The study of past events'. (2), 'The past considered as a whole; the whole series of past events connected with someone or something, an eventful past'. (3), 'A continuous, typically chronological, record of past events or trends'.1 As neat as the above definitions are, they do not go near a comprehensive definition of the discipline. Indeed, historians today and for many years in the past, appear to have been at loggerheads over this and many other questions, including whether or not history can be considered a science. Professor Jeremy Black, in his recent lecture on this subject stated that there is no individual (single) way of studying history; and that no particular part of history is superior to any other. He said that history has two meanings and that these meanings are, "what happened in the past" and, "what the meaning is of what happened in the past."2 Since the past cannot be repeated, unlike a scientific experiment, it is difficult to see how history can be regarded as a science; and while ...read more.

Middle

It was not until the 17th century that this way of thinking or "mindset" began to change due to the influence of the new sciences. From the mid 17th century, the idea of a linear chronology gained ground amongst historians and other thinkers of the age. The mass literacy that occurred during the 19th century confirmed the shift to a linear way of thinking history and the perception that life moves forward; for example, the year 1950 is not the same as 2000 and never could be; the past is dead and its influence on people is not as strong as if it was going to recur. Therefore the last 250 years, characterised as it is by an ever-increasing urbanisation and industrialisation, has led to the situation where we are all linear historicists.3 Assuming that the linear view of history is the correct one, what then is the difference between the past and history? It is that the past is dead and gone; it does not exist except in the memories of people that were alive in a particular time and are still alive, or in documents, artefacts and other surviving physical traces of an historical period. ...read more.

Conclusion

Nevertheless, it could be argued that although these programmes present history in a way that appeals to the "lowest common denominator" (i.e. plenty of breadth, but not much analysis of causes etc.) they are much better than no history at all and ultimately may increase academic influence by virtue of a likely increase in the numbers of people moved to take up formal advanced study of the discipline. In conclusion, E.H.Carr's assertion that historians and historical "facts" interact to create a dialogue is probably close to the mark in defining what history is. He also wrote: 'History begins when men begin to think of the passage of time in terms not of natural processes --- the cycle of the seasons, the human life-span --- but of a series of specific events in which men are consciously involved and which they can consciously influence."4 1 Concise Oxford Dictionary, 2002. 2 Prof. Jeremy Black, University of Exeter lecture, 10/10/2003. 3 Prof. Jeremy Black, University of Exeter lecture, 10/10/2003. 4 Carr, E.H., What Is History, p 129. Palgrave 2001. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. History Extension Major Work- The 1932-33 Bodyline Series

    Bill O'Reilly25 said of Bodyline "What we saw in Australia in 1932-33 was something quite different, and really you could only say that the intention was to scare the daylights out of the batsman, and to put him off his natural game.

  2. From a close study of E.M.Forster's "A Passage to India" and Julian Barnes' "A ...

    art criticism, historical narrative, science fiction, epistolary fiction, he distorts meanings and offers versions to your thought. Like Forster, Barnes offers symbols and recurring motifs as links. The ark and the cruise ship both contain the issue of clean and unclean.

  1. Question 3 History

    Personally I don't think so. Some male employees, who did not fight in the war but remained at home to help stabilise the country, fully co-operated with the women doing skilled work. If the women had not stepped in, the men would have had to work double time to replace the vacant jobs and provide enough equipment for the conflict.

  2. Why is John F Kennedy such a famous and controversial figure in history?

    the many southern politicians he would need to keep onside if he were to pass his reforms. However, all changed when in 1961, a group of courageous young students, black and white, took part in the "freedom rides", where they rode across America in buses ignoring the bus segregation laws.

  1. Discuss whether History can be subjective

    This is not reality, but it instils a widespread sense of national identity and pride in the flag, essential for our capitalist state to succeed. 3 The Nietzschean view is that; 'history is merely a set of stories that we tell ourselves to satisfy our egos'.

  2. Does Hegel's Perception of the World History Mean More Than Just a Popular Quotation?

    But even then the study of history concentrates on the study of nations and not the individual."6 Furthermore, Hegel's conclusion that "The History of the world is none other than the progress of the consciousness of Freedom; a progress whose development according to the necessity of its nature it is

  1. The Impact of Women's History On the Mainstream study of history.

    Before the Victorian era and during, there were few women writers. Many women writers published novels anonymously or gave male names, this was most certainly due to male factors, such as the society being of a male dominated world, or the husbands receiving the payment for their wife's work otherwise

  2. De Bernieres describes History as 'Hearsay tempered with myth and hazy memory.' How does ...

    All evidence can be manipulated, edited and presented in such as way as to support a historian's opinion, thereby making it an interpretation. Throughout history, official records have been altered and deleted, expunging "historical blot[s]" as fits the bias of the powerful.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work