• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is history

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What is history History accounts what happened in the past. It is the academic discipline, which seeks to construct accounts of, and to provide explanations for, what happened in the past. Historical evidence The historian is chiefly directly concerned with documentary evidence of the past. Written sources are divided by historians into primary and secondary sources. Secondary sources are historical writings: articles or books attempting to reconstruct or interpret the past. The written source material which constitutes direct evidence is referred to as primary sources. A historian needs to gather primary sources for the period he is studying, but merely collecting them is not enough. He will need to ensure that this source is authentic: that it is what it purports to be and is not a forgery. He will also need to ensure that the source is reliable. T.E. Lawrence wrote: "... documents are liars. No man ever tried to write down the entire truth of any action in which he was engaged " A document is just the material upon which the historian needs to get to work; it does not speak for itself. ...read more.

Middle

The 19th century German historian Leopold von Ranke saw it his duty as a historian to "show it how it really was". It is now clear that such objectivity is not possible for several reasons: * Selection: firstly, history is based upon the selection of the facts. We mostly know of the history of ancient Greece from Athenian viewpoint . we have no Theban, Corinthian or Spartian chronicle of the Peloponnesian war to compare with Thucydides account, * Systematisation: as we have seen, evidence is always collected, evaluated and interpreted in terms of a pre-existing theory which guides research. The danger is that interpretative pattern will be imposed upon the data, determining which evidence is significant, and worth taking into account, and which is not. * Point of view: history is always written from some particular point of view, Collingwood argued that there is no "objective viewpoint": "St Augustaine looked at history form the point of early Christian; Tillamont form that of a 17th century Frenchman: Gibbon from that of an 18th century Englishman; Momsen from that of 19th century German. ...read more.

Conclusion

Usually the motive for a war was thought to be a monarch's desire for vengeance against an enemy who had previously offended him. Thomas Carlyle stated , "the history of the world is but the biography of great men". Such approach can lead to psychologism, the attempt to understand history through psychology or even the psycho-analysis. This leads to absurd attempts, for example, to explain the holocaust by reference to Hitler's relationship with his mother. Other historians tend to prefer deep, underlying social causes. H.S.Chamberlin argued that racial characteristics were the dominant factor in history, Marx stressed the importance of economical rivalries and class conflict, Freud argued that unconscious psychological forces: the sex drive and the death wish were the supreme movers of history. It does seem that the things that great men do often have results which they did not intend. It is clear that Mr. Gorbachev set out to reform the Soviet system, not destroy it. Most historians consider that great forces really dominate history and the apparent power of remarkable statesmen is an illusion. This seems to be a the conclusion reached by Tolstoy. The great historian Ranke suggested a compromise position: "General tendencies do not decide alone; great personalities are always necessary to make them effective" 1 2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Different Aims and Purposes of the Historians Herodotus and Thucydides.

    is contrasting to Thucydides who supported his recordings through his own personal eyewitness accounts, his reliability and accuracy has been questioned. Yet, again differing from Thucydides, Herodotus didn't feel his duty was to present solely the facts but rather, he says, 'my duty is to report all that

  2. 'How did Hegel envisage the course of history and upon what did he base ...

    The Roman state had a constitution and legal system but in reality this was only an 'abstract freedom of individual.'31 Individuals sought freedom but were unable to influence the domineering power of the state. Freedom could only be found by retreating into oneself.

  1. Why was Bletchley Park able to break the German Enigma codes

    Other reasons must be taken into account though. Such as the clumsy mistakes by the German operators and the help that was given to the British by other countries such as the extraordinary work done by Poland before the war.

  2. Evaluate the arguments for and against oral history as an historical method.

    The Australian bushranger is a prime example as although an outlaw who caused considerable perile to those he came in contact with, Australian's since the time of Ned Kelly adored, even idolised these rebelous characters because an integrel part of the Australian physche to reject authority.

  1. Alexander Von Humboldt in Colombia

    a lo largo de su vida no tuvo la intensi�n ni la vocaci�n de hacer una reforma normativa en la �poca decadente de la monarqu�a espa�ola. En el presente ensayo se han presentado el conjunto de razones por las cuales se demuestra la influencia y utilidad del pensamiento Humboldt en

  2. Am I not a Man and a brother?

    We did not mention that at all, not even to each other; it was far too painful to get the words out of our lips. Time flied on, Samuel soon learned to walk, I was so worried and had to teach him all the time not to offend the whites

  1. The Panchayat system as an early form of conflict resolution in Trinidad.

    By 1901, seventy eight percent (78%) of Indians were thus settled in their own rural communities.19 The establishment of homogenous villages in Trinidad represented a significant step towards forging Indian social and cultural solidarity. Agricultural ties to the land was said to have contributed to the persistence of such institutions as the extended/joint family system, caste endogamy and the arranged marriage.

  2. Question 3 History

    Personally I don't think so. Some male employees, who did not fight in the war but remained at home to help stabilise the country, fully co-operated with the women doing skilled work. If the women had not stepped in, the men would have had to work double time to replace the vacant jobs and provide enough equipment for the conflict.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work