• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is the Evidence for the Roman Occupation of the Antonine Wall?

Extracts from this document...


What is the Evidence for the Roman Occupation of the Antonine Wall? In 138 AD Antoninus Pius succeeded Hadrian as Emperor of Rome and immediately initiated a change of frontier policy in Britain. After re-conquering the Lowlands, Antoninus decided to build a wall to rival that of his predecessor to mark the new northern extent of Roman territory and Hadrian's Wall was abandoned. The Antonine wall spans the narrowest portion of lowland Scotland, between the Firth of Forth and the Firth of Clyde, and the whole exercise probably had a propaganda view point, as expanding the empire would have improved Antoninus' reputation and credibility. However, the events only rated a single sentence in Capitolinus' biography of Antoninus: 'Through his legates he carried on many wars; for he conquered the Britons through Lollius Urbicus the governor, and, after driving back the barbarians, built another wall, of turf.' As the Antonine wall was built of turf it's identity with the quote is reasonably certain. There is evidence to suggest that Antoninus probably needed a quick military success and that the decision for the construction of a new frontier was made as early as 139 AD. An inscription at Corbridge shows that Lollius Urbicus was making preparations for the campaign in 139 AD and coins of Antoninus show that the re-conquest of the Lowlands had been completed by late 142 or early 143 AD. Corbridge had been the site of one of Agricola's bases and at this time was re-garrisoned and re-equipped, and as earlier military aspects of Corbridge's history always reflect events happening in Scotland, it is reasonably safe to assume it was being used as a supply route to move further north. ...read more.


However, if this were the case we would expect the distances built by Legio II to be far greater than those constructed by the other two and this is not so. There is further evidence to suggest that each legion was divided up into two working parties, so we may assume that the greater part of all three legions were present. Duplicate stones were set up at the end of the lengths built by each party, but no cohorts or centuries left records as they did on Hadrian's Wall. Aerial photography discovered fourteen marching camps near the line of the Wall which were probably the housing for the construction parties. There seems little doubt that the occupation of the Antonine Wall was developed into a complex frontier system, but the question remains as to why it was built, particularly after so much time, effort and expense had been put into the Hadrianic system. There is very little direct evidence so most theories depend heavily upon assumptions and circumstantial evidence. It is thought that the Greek writer Pausinias refers to these events when he says, 'Antoninus Pius never willingly made war; but when the Moors took up arms against Rome he drove them out of all their territory.....Also he deprived the Brigantes in Britain of most of their land because they too had begun aggression on the district of Genunia whose inhabitants are subject to Rome.' However, this suggests that Pausinias thought the Brigantes were outside the province, but they had been within it for more than sixty years, so he may well have his facts mixed up and probably meant a tribe further north. ...read more.


Excavators found evidence that the fortlet at Lynne was replaced by a full sized fort and that Loudoun Hill and Carzield were abandoned and not rebuilt. The second occupation of the Antonine Wall was strong and nothing much happened on the Wall or north of it, suggesting that the trouble may have been in southern Scotland and the purpose of the Wall was to separate the tribes in Scotland, preventing conflict between them. Whilst Antoninus Pius lived, Scotland continued to be held, probably because it was the major military achievement of his reign. However after his death in 161, he was succeeded by Marcus Aurelius and policy in the north was re-assessed objectively. It had become obvious that there were just not enough troops to control the vast area between the Pennines and the Forth and in 163 Calpurnius Agricola was sent as governor, the Scriptores Historae Augustae says 'War was threatening in Britain and Calpurnius was sent to deal with it.' Calpurnius rebuilt a number of forts in northern England so it was probably he who implemented the decision to, yet again, withdraw Roman troops from Scotland. Certainly small quantities of late Antonine pottery, found by excavators at Glenlochar proves that the area was sparsely populated and that there was no occupation of the Antonine Wall by 165 AD. Under Marcus Aurelius, Scotland was not totally abandoned, but troops were needed to keep a firmer grip on territory further south and he was probably responsible for the reorganisation and re-occupation of Hadrian's Wall. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. What were the origins of Roman religion and how did it progress?

    However, some emperors also threw astrologers out of the empire because they believed they were a threat to the official religion. Curses and spells also had great influence. Curses would be tossed into sacred springs and hung on walls, often with very violent descriptions written by rejected lovers.

  2. From the evidence available, trace the development of the Jewellery Quarter in the ...

    (Parliamentary Papers, Volumes XIII, XIV and XV) can be seen as either reliable or unreliable with regards to working conditions in the Jewellery Quarter. This is only one source, and it has no other sources to cross reference to, or to support what it says, which doesn't make it very reliable.

  1. Roosevelt's New Deal

    His slippers have the initials U.S which shows it is representing the United States. The old man looks unhappy and in the background there seems to a mess which shows how bad the American economy was. Another thing that can also be seen is a speech bubble saying "OF COURSE

  2. Using evidence from the site, and documentary evidence, present your own explanation of what ...

    believe that the high estimates of men could actually fit on Ambion hill. I think it is likely that de Valera and de Molinet got their information largely through word-of-mouth, and numbers could be exaggerated and changed over such distances, to France and Spain.

  1. What does archaeology show about the life of a Roman soldier in Roman Britain?

    The Corbridge horde shows us 'Lorica segmentata' and spear heads, and chain mail armour has been found near Hadrian's Wall. A small number of old roman letters have been found sent from person to person. Many of these were between families, so soldiers could write home and had a way of sending messages there.

  2. The Panchayat system as an early form of conflict resolution in Trinidad.

    Under rural farming conditions, the social structure of the Indo Trinidadian was remarkably similar to that of his village counterpart in India and it supposedly exhibited the same kind of functional integration, for example in the relationship between caste and marriage, agriculture and family organization, inheritance patterns and paternal authority.20

  1. What does archaeology show about the life of a Roman soldier on Hadrian's Wall?

    When not in armour, Roman soldiers wore casual, simple clothes, including trousers and a top. Diet: The soldiers' main food was bread, which supplied them with Carbohydrates, as they did not have rice or potatoes. They ground the grain themselves, on small hand-powered grinders, and then cooked the bread on small fires.

  2. Who was the real Custer, and to what extent was he to blame for ...

    "I have never met a more enterprising, gallant or dangerous enemy during those four years of terrible war, or a more genial, whole-souled, chivalrous gentleman and friend in peace." Sources given by T.L Rosser, former major General, confederate Army, speaking of Custer during the Civil War.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work