• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What Primary and Secondary Evidence is Available to Prove Roman Forts Existed in Britain, and how Reliable is this Evidence

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What Primary and Secondary Evidence is Available to Prove Roman Forts Existed in Britain, and how Reliable is this Evidence Due to the lack of roman evidence, we must build up a picture of Roman Britain like a jigsaw piece by piece. To build up this jigsaw we have to use all the evidence available to us primary and secondary. Whilst using this evidence to build up a picture of Roman Britain we also have to be aware of new evidence, which becomes available to us. Such techniques as aerial photography and computer enhanced imaging become more advanced so will more information become available and this may or may not change our ideas on Roman Britain. We are going to look at a city called Chester to find out more about Roman Britain and see if they did build forts in Britain. In Chester there is a selection of primary and secondary evidence to look at from the Roman conquest in Britain. In Chester there is a Garden called The Roman Gardens this is a tourist attraction where Roman artefacts have been moved to because of lack of space in the city of Chester. ...read more.

Middle

The amphitheatre in Chester is based upon a similar one in Cerulean in South Wales, because Cerulean was I fort it would be reasonable to presume that Chester was also a fort. However, there is a problem for historians when evaluating the amphitheatre because there is only half of it visible, the over half is under the convent so we have to use educated guesswork to envisage what the other half looks like. These guesses are quite reliable because archaeologists are well trained in what they do. The South East Angle Tower is in the centre of Chester opposite the amphitheatre. Unfortunately there are only 2 or 3 layers of foundation stone's left. There is a Plaque, which is secondary evidence, that tells us that there was a ditch measuring 9*20ft. The South East Angle Tower indicated that the walls were probably built for defence because they are so thick. Also, the size of the ditch suggests it was a defensive feature. As with the amphitheatre, historians have to use educated guesswork with the other angle towers as they are under the ground. Next to the Cathedral there is a piece of roman wall. Most of the wall in Chester is medieval wall. We can tell this because of there size and cut. ...read more.

Conclusion

In the Museum there where an array of about 30 to 40 gravestones dating from 2000 years ago with roman information on them. The gravestones suggest a military presence because most of the gravestones were gravestones of soldiers and cavalrymen. This would suggest that Chester was a Roman fort because it would need defending and solider and cavalrymen would be needed and some of these men may have been killed defending Chester. Also in the Museum there is an array of pieces of amour and shields also there are horses bridles and stirrups. This evidence suggests that Chester was a military base because soldiers and cavalrymen would only use this equipment. This evidence can be regarded as reasonably reliable because it has been well researched by trained Archaeologists. Some of the secondary evidence in the museum such as models of forts, barracks, soldiers the South East Angle Tower. These models give a reasonably reliable picture of roman Chester because trained Archaeologists and model builders, which have researched what they where building. However, Historians studying Roman Chester would have to be wary of these models (evidence) because it is an educated guess and the models are quiet old some are around 40 years old and between those 40 years new evidence may have been found. Which make the models out of date. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. How Reliable is Schindler's List As A Representation of the Holocaust?

    also Itzhak Stein, Amon Goeth and all the Jewish survivors", showing that Steven's portrayal of these people is, indeed, reliable. A huge effort was made to ensure that the film looked as authentic as possible, which is done through the use of the set, costumes and hairstyles.

  2. What Do Roman Authors Tell Us About The Celts? To What Extent Are Their ...

    explanation for the brightness of the British nights - that the ends of the Earth were flat and could therefore not allow the darkness to reach the height of the sky and its stars. However, it is unfair to condemn him for this particular point, as, at this point in

  1. The Roman army

    An order came from the top and reached the soldiers via the officers in higher positions than themselves. This made sure there was no confusion as only one person gave the orders. The Roman army had a strict power scheme in which everybody knew their place and who was higher

  2. How useful is visible evidence in explaining the development of power at Styal Mill ...

    The main focus on this is the building development. For example, such wording as "Old mill" and "New boiler" shows us that different sections of the buildings were built at different times. In other words, if it states" new" then it is likely to have been built around 1855 (the time the document was written).

  1. 'How did Hegel envisage the course of history and upon what did he base ...

    ends that are its own, both in the subjective sense that they are grounded in its reflectively endorsed desires and evaluations, and in the objective sense they are grounded in its own true goals and purposes as a rational being.'9 Restrictions on freedom should not exist so perfect harmony can

  2. What is the Evidence for the Roman Occupation of the Antonine Wall?

    It has also been noted that the spacing between the forts is quite close, 3.2km apart, as opposed to 8-12km apart on Hadrian's Wall. The fort at Mumrills was big enough for a cohort of 1,000 men and Old Kilpatrick, Balmuildy, Castlecary, Bar Hill and Cadder are large enough for cohorts 500 strong or even more.

  1. Why the Roman army was so good

    A short, powerful thrust going a few inches into a man was much more deadly, though less dramatic, than the wide, energy wasting slashes made by an individual warrior showboating in front of his buddies. Medium length Throwing Spear or Javelin (pilum)

  2. Newport Quay

    In the 19th century there was a large population increase, this was deeply down to the industrial revolution. There was a lower infant mortality, meaning more grew up, so people generally had bigger families; people could sustain these families because they were richer due to the industrial revolution.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work