• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What problem did Russia face after the1905 Revolution? How effective was Nicholas II in dealing with these problems?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What problem did Russia face after the1905 Revolution? How effective was Nicholas II in dealing with these problems? In January 1905, there was a revolutionary tide in Russia. We called this revolution as 1905 Revolution mainly caused by the defeat of Russo-Japanese War in September and the Bloody Sunday Incident in January. In the country, workers, peasants and merchants were holding demonstrations in order to express their discontent to the Czarist government. Although Nicholas II issued the October Manifesto to pacify the discontent of people temporarily, he still had to face some problems after the 1905 Revolution. To regain the support from people, he needed to carry out the reforms in the October Manifesto. His reform included different aspect, such as political aspect, social aspect and economic aspect. He also appointed Peter Stolypin as the prime minister to stabilize the country. Nicholas II had tried his best to regain people's support and stop the revolution tide through the reforms after the 1905 Revolution. ...read more.

Middle

In social aspect, people had to pay a huge land payment, it added to the burden of people. Czar Nicholas II agreed to abolish the land payment to peasant. He also lent loan to farmers and gave subsides to farmers in order to lead them improve farm method by using machine instead of cow and man. This succeeded to create a class of Kulaks, rich people. The land reform had created a rich class at first, and then it would improve the general Russians. This land reform was a long-term scheme to improve the livelihood of general Russians, although it couldn't their life right now. As a result, the land reform still succeeded in long-term period. To win people over to 2 the side of the government, the Czar allowed Stolypin to build schools to provide Russians with eleme ntary education. He also introduced free education with the aim to achieve compulsory free education. This education reform was successful to increase the rate of literacy of Russians. ...read more.

Conclusion

The revolutionary tide even seemed to be died down. Therefore, the industrial reform in Russia was effective. Although the Czar had adopted reforms, it could not reduce the discontent of Russians at all. Russians still felt discontented with the Czar, especially the intellectuals. Intellectuals felt discontent with the Czar because they thought the Czar was an unrepresentative nature of the government. Moreover, they had no right to vote in Duma. The general people had no voice in Duma, except the nobles and rich people. The peasants were also discontent with the Czarist government. The peasant still cultivated with a small piece of plot, their livelihood didn't have much improve. The workers also had no improvement about their poor working condition. The discontent of those Russians had not reduced by Czar's reforms. On the other hand, The Czar had achieved the aims in some reforms, such as education reform, industrial reform and land reform. However, when compared with the whole national reform, these reforms only represented partly success. The discontent of people had not reduced so much, even nearly remain unchanged or increased. In conclusion, Nicholas II was not effective in dealing with problems after 1905 Revolution. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This is a well structured response, which examines each key area of reform and weighs up evidence for and against Nicholas II's effectiveness. The author's opinion is strongly conveyed, which improves the essay but the language is stilted and this hinders the flow of the answer. 4 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 09/04/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II responsible for his own downfall?

    5 star(s)

    The Bloody Sunday massacre shocked people all around the world, it caused a wave of protests against the Tsar more than half a million workers went on strike and later on the 17th February the Tsar's uncle was killed. Nicholas wrote in his diary, "There has been serious disorder in

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    He might be shown giving speeches to the workers or he might be shown embracing children in his arms. This gave the people of Russia a 'father figure' to look up to and admire. If all they had done before was to be ignored by their government and officials, they

  1. What Were The Causes Of The 1905 Russian Revolution? How Successful Was This Revolution?

    The workers had expected to go to the palace and then see the Tsar and everything would be O.K. Most people would be shocked by the goings on Bloody Sunday because they would expect the Tsar to reason with them.

  2. How successful were Stalins Economic Policies?

    This level of control helped the Five Year Plans to be carried out effectively. He set targets, which were passed down through the 'hierarchy' of management so they could be carried out by everyone. The targets seemed unrealistic but in most cases they were close to achieving them - Stalin

  1. How convincing is the argument that WW1 was the main factor in the collapse ...

    rigid barriers erected against political change."2 The peasant's antagonism towards the autocratic system was also heightened due to the fact the peasants were not free men but were bound to a village commune. The government was hesitant to change the village commune system, as it made it easier to gather

  2. What were the causes and consequences of the 1905 revolution?

    The manifesto was deliberately vague and left many parts open to loopholes. The manifesto split the groups that collectively had brought about the revolution. Those who were satisfied with the manifesto formed the Octobrist party. The liberals who wanted more power for the Duma consolidated in the Constitutional Democratic Party.

  1. Was the October revolution a popular uprising or a coup d(TM)tat?

    lot of independent action within the local levels of the Bolshevik party and the Soviets. They believe that the October revolution was a popular uprising as the take over was aided by the growth of radicalism among the soldiers, workers, sailors and peasants.

  2. What were the Causes of the October Revolution in Russia, 1917?

    There was the war, the economy and the land that needed sorting out. With these major issues not being sorted, the people involved were again becoming more discontent and so turned to extreme parties like the Bolshevicks. This is how the people as a mass links in, because it was

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work