• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What problem did Russia face after the1905 Revolution? How effective was Nicholas II in dealing with these problems?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What problem did Russia face after the1905 Revolution? How effective was Nicholas II in dealing with these problems? In January 1905, there was a revolutionary tide in Russia. We called this revolution as 1905 Revolution mainly caused by the defeat of Russo-Japanese War in September and the Bloody Sunday Incident in January. In the country, workers, peasants and merchants were holding demonstrations in order to express their discontent to the Czarist government. Although Nicholas II issued the October Manifesto to pacify the discontent of people temporarily, he still had to face some problems after the 1905 Revolution. To regain the support from people, he needed to carry out the reforms in the October Manifesto. His reform included different aspect, such as political aspect, social aspect and economic aspect. He also appointed Peter Stolypin as the prime minister to stabilize the country. Nicholas II had tried his best to regain people's support and stop the revolution tide through the reforms after the 1905 Revolution. ...read more.

Middle

In social aspect, people had to pay a huge land payment, it added to the burden of people. Czar Nicholas II agreed to abolish the land payment to peasant. He also lent loan to farmers and gave subsides to farmers in order to lead them improve farm method by using machine instead of cow and man. This succeeded to create a class of Kulaks, rich people. The land reform had created a rich class at first, and then it would improve the general Russians. This land reform was a long-term scheme to improve the livelihood of general Russians, although it couldn't their life right now. As a result, the land reform still succeeded in long-term period. To win people over to 2 the side of the government, the Czar allowed Stolypin to build schools to provide Russians with eleme ntary education. He also introduced free education with the aim to achieve compulsory free education. This education reform was successful to increase the rate of literacy of Russians. ...read more.

Conclusion

The revolutionary tide even seemed to be died down. Therefore, the industrial reform in Russia was effective. Although the Czar had adopted reforms, it could not reduce the discontent of Russians at all. Russians still felt discontented with the Czar, especially the intellectuals. Intellectuals felt discontent with the Czar because they thought the Czar was an unrepresentative nature of the government. Moreover, they had no right to vote in Duma. The general people had no voice in Duma, except the nobles and rich people. The peasants were also discontent with the Czarist government. The peasant still cultivated with a small piece of plot, their livelihood didn't have much improve. The workers also had no improvement about their poor working condition. The discontent of those Russians had not reduced by Czar's reforms. On the other hand, The Czar had achieved the aims in some reforms, such as education reform, industrial reform and land reform. However, when compared with the whole national reform, these reforms only represented partly success. The discontent of people had not reduced so much, even nearly remain unchanged or increased. In conclusion, Nicholas II was not effective in dealing with problems after 1905 Revolution. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This is a well structured response, which examines each key area of reform and weighs up evidence for and against Nicholas II's effectiveness. The author's opinion is strongly conveyed, which improves the essay but the language is stilted and this hinders the flow of the answer. 4 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 09/04/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II responsible for his own downfall?

    5 star(s)

    As the people moved closer to the palace they faced a line of Cossack Calvary and with one command from the captain the troops began to shoot at the crowds and throw their swords into the crowds of people killing hundreds.

  2. How successful were Stalins Economic Policies?

    They were often shot, or sent to labour camps. Based on the figures and evidence available today, the Five Year Plans seem to be highly successful in terms of economic progress. This was probably because Stalin used 'top down planning' in Russia, which enabled him to exercise strict control on everyone, down to the individual worker, because everyone had someone to answer to.

  1. What were the causes of the Russian Revolution in March 1917?

    Eventually he gave in and issued the 'October Manifesto' on 30th October. This promised: 1. A parliament or Duma elected by the people 2. Civil rights - e.g. freedom of speech and conscience 3. Uncensored newspapers and he right to form political parties As a result, the liberals and middle

  2. Nov 97 : How serious athreat to the French Revolution was presented by the ...

    All this might result in the defeat of the revolutionary army and brought France under the control of the Great Powers, Belgium and Holland. The most obvious internal enemy of France was Louis XVI as he veto several decrees; the decree of 4 August 1789, the Declaration of the Right

  1. The Causes of the October Revolution

    But in arming the soviets of Moscow Kerensky had given Lenin the opportunity to plan a new coup as the Bolsheviks were now armed. The Kournilov coup had shown that a right-wing uprising was still possible. In order to see the reasons for the right wing wanting an uprising we need to look at the source.

  2. How did the rule of Stalin affect the Soviet Union?

    * The government charged the peasants for use of government equipment. * Exporting grain. * Universities expanded to supply skilled workers and engineers. * In the factories the workers got paid different, skilled workers were paid more; this was used to encourage the workers to work harder.

  1. Why did Russia leave World War One?

    A short term reason for this could have been that troops wanted to desert their battlefield and exchange it for a field of their own; this is because there was a massive land grab at this time. People wanted to grow their own food as there was very little that they could buy or it was too expensive.

  2. Write a letter to Czar Nicholas II reporting on the state of ...

    A typical village in the north of Russia shows utter filth and squalor. The average peasant lives in a two room cottage; the rooms have dirt floor and very few furnishings, unlike the upper class houses which are fully furnished with spotless flooring.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work