• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What triggered the Tsars fall?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What triggered the Tsars fall? Many in Russia would argue that it was the catastrophic impact of war coupled with the failure or the Tsar/Tsarina to embark upon the problems created by involvement in World War One that triggered the Tsar's fall. Nevertheless it is fair to say that discontent among the Russian people had been growing for several years. This dissatisfaction destabilized the position of the Tsar and undermined his authority. Was it a series of mitigating circumstances and bad luck that brought on the Tsar's downfall? Or was the Tsar's own incompetence the key to his failure? There were many causes for the growing discontent in Russia before 1914. There were various politically related issues linked to power, control and government. Nicholas was a deeply religious man and believed he had been chosen to rule Russia by God and felt that he did not have to consult others about his decisions. In the period of late 19th and early 20th century there was an age of modernisation spreading through Western Europe. Everything had advanced, both technologically and socially. But the Tsar's refusal to adapt to his rapidly changing country created serious social and political grievances. A huge civil service was employed to carry out decisions about the country (the Tsar always having the final say) ...read more.

Middle

There was a massive shortage of food; one of the reasons for this being that millions of male peasants were conscripted to the army so consequently there was a lack of farmers and in result of that, a lack of food. Secondly, the Russian railway system was being used to transport provisions to the war front and so there were fewer trains for food. To add to the insult, the lack of coal and fuel meant that citizens in the cities were cold as well as famished! After all this discontent gathering in Russia, the cities began to lose confidence in the government. In September 1915, Nicholas, already under a significant amount of pressure, increased the strain on himself when he decided to take over the running of the war and go to the war front himself. This was a terrible mistake and his decision had serious consequences; being in charge of the war meant that he was blamed for all of the defeats! As Nicholas now spent most of his time at GHQ, (the military headquarters) he handed the responsibility for the domestic policy and the running of the country over to his wife, the Tsarina (Alexandra Fyodorovna). ...read more.

Conclusion

Rasputin was merely a symptom, not a cause. Personally I believe that the Tsar himself was the chief cause of his own fall. First of all, he hardly knew his country at all. There were countless demands for change within Russia but he disregarded them and often tried to crush anybody valiant enough to stand up. He owned one sixth of the world and hardly knew anything about the people in it! Perhaps if he had found out what his people sought after, then the pressure may have decreased. You would have thought that already being under a great deal of strain, Nicholas would be intelligent enough not to take over the management of the war. But possibly, if he didn't know his country then maybe he didn't realise how poorly equipped the soldiers were and how half of the army was made up of peasants since the professionals had already been wiped out! So then there was the issue that being in command predestined that he was held liable for all of Russia's defeats, thus creating even more pressure for himself. Well, I'm astounded he didn't explode with all that anxiety hanging over him. There is no doubt that Nicholas was a well-meaning person and devoted to his family, but in all sincerity, a duck would have probably done a better job. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Why was the Tsar's government overthrown in February/March 1917

    Logistics were also a problem, since Russia's poorly maintained roads and railroads inhibited communication and distribution of supplies. Almost everywhere Russian forces were matched against German forces who had a superior advantage in weaponry, military talent, and logistics.

  2. The fall of Tsarism in Russia.

    Source G is a report that was made to the Duma in 1916 by Rodzyenko, the president of the Duma. The president informed the Duma that General Ruzsky had complained about the overall conditions that the Russian soldiers were battling in.

  1. Stalin man or monster

    because Stalin didn't base his decisions on evidence but on suspicion as source J illustrate. Many of the most gifted and able citizens had disappeared. The army and navy were seriously weakened by the loss of most senior officers. Industrial and technical progress was hampered by the loss of top scientists and engineers.

  2. How far was military defeat responsible for the fall (abdication) of the Tsar in ...

    Many workers' organisations, soviets and trade unions began to appear and the government had no choice but to legalise them. The 1905 Revolution was another long term factor responsible for the fall of the Tsar and it led to the October Manifesto and the Duma.

  1. Use source A and your knowledge of the period to explain why some people ...

    Besides the cake it says, ' The time will come- the people will rise up in revolt, they will straighten their back, they will topple this edifice.' This means that when the poor and peasant people at the bottom of the cake react then the whole of Russia is in trouble because they will 'Topple.'

  2. How Successful Was Roosevelt’s New Deal?

    We can always make another man'. This could be to blame them for the problems of Russia and make them scapegoats. Stalin might also want to use this source to say to the Capitalist nations of the world that any stories that they may have heard about Russia were not his fault, but the people beneath him.

  1. How secure was the Tsar's powers up to 1904?

    Therefore workers again found them selves outside society and with no alternative but to support revolutionaries.

  2. Stalin: Man or Monster?

    We have to realise that Stalin wrote this after the second world war and was trying to win over Eastern Europe. He was trying to put forward the image of a caring, yet extremely successful politician. I have emphasised the word comrade because in indicates the language of a communist,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work