• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What was the significance of submarines in the First World War?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What was the significance of submarines in the First World War? Britain's main aim in the Dardanelles was to get access to the Sea of Marmora to supply route access to their eastern ally Russia. However the allies Dardanelles campaign was a military disastrous. Although it was a complete military disaster, British submarines were not a complete disaster. The ultimate impact of British submarines in the Dardanelles was not great in the sense that they did not change the course of the campaign. However, they had proved that they were a valuable weapon when used properly. The activities of Allied submarines were a bright spot in a dismal story, though three French and four British submarines were lost in the effort. However, they had sunk seven Turkish warships, 16 transports and supply ships, and 230 steamers and small vessels. Although the British had to withdraw, they still managed to do a lot of damage to Turkey. This is a significant factor because it was the first real success of the British submarines. Submarines were now seen as a morale booster for all the British people. The Dardanelles proved how significant the British submarines were. It was the first time in 500 years that a boat managed to managed to surface in Istanbul. ...read more.

Middle

In January, before the declaration of "unrestricted submarine warfare" 43,550 tones of shipping had been sunk by U-boats. The number of sinking's then steadily increased, with 168,200 tones going down in August. This is very significant as Britain, an island nation, was heavily dependent on foreign trade and imported resources. Britain came within six week of running out of grain. Unrestricted submarine warfare was first introduced in World War I in early 1915, when Germany declared the area around the British Isles a war zone, in which all-merchant ships, including those from neutral countries, would be attacked by the German navy. Unrestricted warfare caused a bitter argument between the leaders. Bethmann Hollweg argued the danger of alienating neutral countries, particularly the Netherlands and America. He was frightened and persuaded to override the use of submarines this caused annoyance to the conservatives. On the 1st February 1917, unrestricted submarine warfare commenced. It was a desperate gamble with only a slender chance of success. As Bethmann Hollweg had predicted, technical advances enabled Britain to win the Battle against the submarines. Unrestricted submarine warfare, 600,000 tons of Allied vessels could be sunk per month, bringing Britain to starvation within six months The Germans biggest mistake was to sink the American Cruise-liner, the Lusitania, which was one reason why the USA decided to enter the war in 1917. ...read more.

Conclusion

As the expanding German war machine needed more and more iron, so the need to gain it became more and more difficult. As long as this difficulty occurred, the German army could never be at its most functional and efficient. If the German military hierarchy was putting some of its efforts into such a basic issue as the acquisition of iron ore as opposed to other more military-based problems, then the latter had to suffer accordingly. German best chances of winning the war was through their U-boats, without iron to help build more U-boats, it made it a lot harder for Germany to continue such a strong blockade against Britain. In my opinion, the most significance caused by the submarine was the entering of USA. The U-boats nearly won the Germans the war as they were able to nearly starve Britain of all food supplies however; in the end, it was indirectly the u-boats that lost them the war. The Germans were within weeks of winning the war however because of the sinking of Lusitania, America decided to get in involved on the allies side. This is very significant as if the submarines hadn't angered the Americas which lead to them deciding to join the war, Germany may have won the war. If Germany had won them, the war the history that we know today may have been completely different. ?? ?? ?? ?? Page 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Gallic war

    said that five years had to elapse between magistracy and provincial commands, and that all candidates must appear in person at elections. This affected Caesar � he wanted to be immediately re-elected without returning to Rome; otherwise, would be prosecuted for illegal actions during consulship of 59.

  2. WW1 - technology and trench warfare.

    Almost constant rain had turned the battlefield into a sea of mud and destroyed any hope of a major advance. North of Ypres advances of 2 miles were made and Pilckem Ridge was captured from the Germans. However, further south, around the Menin road the attack was far less successful.

  1. There is plenty to suggest that women never got away from their traditional role. ...

    The source E5 shows men had to be careful when finding a girlfriend but this doesn't fully prove that DeMarco's view is correct about women having a traditional role. This source could be seen as reliable because it supports DeMarco's view and shows women as the carriers of disease however

  2. What was the Contribution of Technology towards Winning the War for Britain?

    Problems were a factor from the start - they were inevitable. Likewise, the British sent 400 tanks forward but they were sent back because they couldn't manage to hold ground. They needed to dig in but didn't. So, all of the advancing was in vain.

  1. Berlin Blockade

    For this reason, both sides saw that they need more support, and a good way to gain support was to give support to the ones that really needed it. They propped up their regimes also through propaganda, mainly through the growing media because they could easily hide the bias.

  2. Essay on First World War (Some schools part3)

    It had also contributed to a much bigger problem which was the development of stalemate, which had in effect, affected the whole war. The stalemate is a stop in fighting during a war. Enemies are usually unable to advance. It occurs when trenches are build, which in the case of

  1. What was the contribution of tanks towards winning the war for Britain?

    The tank had been designed perfectly for its needs. The rhomboid shape was perfect for crossing trenches. The tank drives to the edge of the trench and tip of the tank slants forward and touches the other end. The rest of the tank then pushes itself out of the trench.

  2. How and why writers have explored different views of the First World War. ...

    The second part explores exposure to the elements and how this is just as dangerous. The language Owen uses in the poem is deeply disturbing and provides horrifying images of the soldiers. Something I noticed straight away is how Owen uses almost rhymes.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work