What were the gains and losses between 1861-1870 of the creation of Italy?

Authors Avatar

Rebecca Johnson        Miss Garvie

What were the gains and losses between 1861-1870 of the creation of Italy?

There are two main areas that must be looked at in order to explain the gains and losses between 1861-1870. These are Political unification, which is mainly to do with the domestic area and Geographical unification, which is mainly to do with Venetia and Rome.

To start the idea of Political Unification D’Azeglio who was part of the Risorgimento said, “Italy is made, now we must make Italians.” By this he meant that Italy needed to gain a sense of identity, seen as only two and a half per cent spoke Italian. There was poor communication due to the North and South divide as there were economic differences. The North was the urban part of Italy and was economically better then the rural south.

There was a Piedmontese system imposed on the rest of Italy, which meant that the other states had to follow Piedmontese rules. The democratic idea was that there should be a constituent assembly, which would be composed of delegates from all parts of Italy and would decide on the format of the Italian government. Garibaldi had already proposed that Naples should gain a constitution. However after unification in 1861 the laws and the government of Piedmont were extended to all of the other states apart from Tuscany. Therefore the ‘Statuto’ of 1848 became the Italian constitution. From this it can be said that the creation of the new state in 1861 was more like an expansion of Piedmont than the unification of Italy. This was supported by the fact that Victor Emmanuel kept his Piedmontese title, Victor Emmanuel II instead of his proper name of Victor Emmanuel I. Also Piedmont’s capital Turin became the capital of Italy. The statuto however was very restricted because only 2 per cent of adult males could vote before 1861. The manipulation of elections in Piedmont was now applied to the whole peninsula, no parties emerged, only shaky coalitions, which did not confront problems but simply aimed at staying in office. The ruling party believed that the sate had to be centralised and given common instructions for it to survive. Also the Piedmontese model of strong central government and weak local government was applied throughout the peninsula. Prefects and sub-prefects in the provinces and mayors in the towns, who were all now royal appointees, controlled the localities. The legal system was unified and imposed on all, except in Tuscany and the civil code was finally adopted in 1865. Piedmont’s religious laws formally separated church and state and inspired the pope to issue a decree in 1868 forbidding Catholics to participate in the political life of the new state. Moreover common weights and measures and currency were applied and internal tariff barriers were removed. However the application of liberal economics in the form of free trade proved damaging to the weak southern economy especially concerning industry. A unified army was created but there was dissatisfaction from Garibaldi’s men because they had been forced to sign up and the Neapolitan armies were been favoured by gaining commissions.  Education became the central state responsibility and it was not religious and this annoyed the pope. These were sensible liberal measures, but were fairly controversial because the population was overwhelmed by the amount of reforms imposed and high taxation. The pressing needs of the military establishment led to the introduction of conscription which was very unpopular and the desperate financial needs of the new kingdom led to the imposition of high taxes; therefore Italians became the heaviest taxed in Europe. The grist tax had to be re-introduced which was a levy on the grinding of wheat, which hit the poor particularly hard.

Join now!

Many politicians including Cavour had very little understanding off the south. It was full of poverty and had a lack of economy therefore this meant that it was unsuitable for unification with Piedmont, based on the Piedmontese laws. The Piedmontese policies had a harmful effect on the south, because tariffs were reduced and local goods began to lose out to imports from the rest of Italy. Also the Piedmontese had tactlessly referred to the Southerners, as been ‘barbarous, shiftless and lazy’. This led to peasants and de-mobilised peasants to take to the hills of Sicily and the mainland, using ...

This is a preview of the whole essay