"What were the German objections to the Treaty of Versailles and how reasonable were they?"

Authors Avatar

“What were the German objections to the Treaty of Versailles and

 how reasonable were they?”

It has often been thought that the Treaty of Versailles was an overly harsh treaty, especially by the Germans. But though on a few points the Germans objections where unjustified as they had just lost the largest ever war in history, not to mention the most expensive, some of there objections were valid.  For instance the peace treaty was not a mutual treaty. The allies had allowed no room for discussion and the Germans had no input into the treaty, therefore it was a dictated peace. Having allowed the Germans a slight input, maybe even to say what was viable, would have probably been a good idea. And at the end of the day it would have eliminated Hitler’s argument about the Diktat, namely that it was not morally binding. But on the other hand what should the Germans have expected after the overly harsh Brest-Litovsk Treaty with the Russians? For that too was a Diktat and far harsher on the Russians in terms of Land loss.

Join now!

        A point that the Germans objected to was the fact that they “said” they had been promised Woodrow Wilson’s 14 points. But this was most definitely an invalid objection on the basis the fact that when the 14 points were made in January 1918 Germany had just ignored them for they still thought there was a chance of a outright German victory. Also the 14 points had never been promised to the Germans, they were really just Wilson thinking out loud.

The loss of territory in Europe was a term of the peace treaty that really got underneath ...

This is a preview of the whole essay