• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What Were the Main Criticisms of the League of Nations and To What Extent Were the Criticisms Justified?

Extracts from this document...


WHAT WERE THE MAIN CRITICISMS OF THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS AND TO WHAT EXTENT WERE THE CRITICISMS JUSTIFIED? In a time where military action was one of the greatest methods used to resolve issues and disputes between nations, it is not surprising that the idea of international cooperation was a frequently discussed concept. Prior to the League of Nations, there had been other attempts at achieving international peace such as The Hague Conferences (1899 and 1907) and the International Red Cross (est.1864). The League of Nations was established in 1920 to preserve peace and improve the living conditions of people globally. It was an organization originally promoted by US President Woodrow Wilson, which involved a total of sixty-three countries of which only twenty-eight remained in the League for its entire existence. There was great support for a World League following the First World War due to the magnitude of destruction caused by the War. Furthermore, the idea that war could be prevented through alternative measures to military action also led to the formation of the League. Over the twenty-six year lifespan of the League of Nations, there were many events which displayed the weaknesses of the League, and led to the formation of many criticisms of the organization. ...read more.


A dispute over the Aaland Islands in 1921 between Finland and Sweden was successfully resolved by the League of Nations. Both countries had made claim for the islands, which were situated between the two nations. The League had decided the islands were to go to Finland, and both countries willingly accepted this decision. This success of the League was settled quickly and without conflict. The League also was responsible for many successes at a social level. They created many organizations such as the Health Commission and the International Labour Office. The Health Commission started a campaign to eliminate leprosy, which was seen successful. The League also was involved in many third world countries, with a fresh water campaign, women and child slave labour campaign and assistance in drug addiction. The League of Nations was the first organization to confront social problems, which in itself was seen as a positive result of the League, because it increased the awareness of many social issues. The League was unarguably very successful in the social concerns they challenged. The League was greatly mocked for its lack of cooperation and participation among its member nations, and criticized for not including a few essential countries. Lack of cooperation is evident in both the Invasion of the Ruhr and Italy's conquest of Abyssinia. ...read more.


A second fundamental principle of the League was that nations would have to put the interests of the organization ahead of national self-interest. During Italy's conquest of Abyssinia, the League would only go to the extent of implementing sanctions on Italy. Had they closed the Suez Canal, they would have perhaps greatly stifled Italy's military abilities, however because it was not in the best interests of Britain and France to close the Canal, the League could not act to the best of their ability in Abyssinia. Both of these key principles of the League are justifiably too idealistic, because it is clearly evident within the history of the institute that these views were rather impractical. Therefore, criticizing the League as having a too idealistic platform is to a great extent justifiable. The League of Nations has been a commonly criticized organization, of which it's membership and cooperation, its power and capacity to deal with situations, and its idealistic platform are all analyzed and judged. For the reasons above, being that the League was both somewhat triumphant and unsuccessful in the challenges it assumed throughout its existence, many of the criticisms of the League can only be justified to a certain extent. Although for the most part valid, the previously presented criticisms are not entirely justifiable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was The Treaty Of Versailles Justified?

    5 star(s)

    During the war many French coalmines had been put out of action so while they were being repaired France was to receive coal from the German mines in the Saarland. Also during the time that Adolf Hitler was in power in Germany he spent more than the Allies demanded in reparations on weapons and rebuilding the army.

  2. To what extent was the League of Nations a success?

    Both sides agreed to this. Although I have shown that the league had quite a few successes it was most famous for it's failures. In the 1920's the league had many successes but after the Great depression the League of Nations fell apart.

  1. Account for the successes and failures of the League of Nations.

    It is significant to note that none of the settled disputes went against a major power which may have challenged the League's decision. This illustrates how successful the League actually was. The League of Nations was also quick to prove its value by settling the Swedish-Finnish dispute over the sovereignty of the Aaland Islands (1920-21).

  2. The failure of the League of Nations

    They agreed to divide up Abyssinia giving two thirds to Mussolini leaving the remaining third for Haile Selassie. Details of the plan were found out and Hoare and Laval were both sacked. By this time it was two late anyway as Mussolini had already taken over large parts of Italy.

  1. The League of Nations in Action - successes and failures.

    Mussolini, the new Italian dictator, took advantage of the situation, demanding compensation from the Greek. Success or failure? Failure 6. Economic collapse in Austria and Hungary What happened? Hungary faced bankruptcy. Their economies had not recovered after the war, and now, burdened with reparations payments, it seemed that they would simply collapse.

  2. Why the League of Nations Failed?

    The covenant was a set of 26 articles or laws that all members agreed to follow. These encouraged countries to co-operate in trade and in improving the social conditions. They also encouraged nations to disarm. Nevertheless Article 10 said that all members of the league would act together to ensure

  1. Was the league of nations a complete failure?

    However oil and coal were not banned for fear that it would affect the British mining industry. One of the most important decisions however was the fact that the Suez Canal was not closed to Mussolini due to fears of a full scale war with Italy, this was important because the canal was Mussolini's main supply route to Abyssinia.

  2. The League of Nations: Its achievements and its failures

    Bulgaria then appealed for help, but also sent orders to its army. The League condemned the Greek action. It told Greece to pull its troops out and to pay compensation to Bulgaria. Greece only agreed because it feared the disapproval of the major powers in the League.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work