• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What were the strengths and weaknesses of the Russian monarchy in 1894?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What were the strengths and weaknesses of the Russian monarchy in 1894? Just previous to 1894, the king was Alexander III, 49 years old. Alexander was incredibly influenced by Konstantin Pobedenestov, Procurator of the Holy Synod, who also believed in an anti-western Russia (later backed by the Slavophiles, who also disliked the Western way of life). He brought back censorship in education and he press and also produced the Russification of non nationalist groups. The reduction of peasant representation on the Zemstvo and the creation of the Land captains to restore the traditional authority within the localities were also brought into the picture by Alexander III. It was believed that he had, barring assassination, many years left to his reign. As the year went on, his health deteriorated at an alarming rate. The best doctors of the time were called to help, but none were able to save the dying Emperor. Alexander Alexandrovich Romanov, Tsar of Russia, died of Nephritis on October 20, at the summer palace in the Crimea. ...read more.

Middle

Agriculture was backward and heavily taxed, partly to finance industrialization. During Alexander III reign, the industrialisation had just taken off, which put a State investment in railroads and the steel industry. The beginnings of the foreign intervention in the Russian industry lead to much of the profits leaving the country. Russia had to become less dependent on the other European countries. The Russian monarchy in 1894 had Nicholas II as its leader, who had married Princess Alix of Hesse. Soon after he came to power, Nicholas II stated that he wished to maintain the autocratic system. He continued the suppression of opposition, the persecution of religious minorities, and the Russification of the borderlands. The revolutionary groups were rising in the dark. One of the main problems with the monarchy was their lack of attention to the poor communication problems throughout that period. This caused the Russians many problems because of the fact that once communication had reached a certain point in Russia, it was already outdated information, and too late for whatever needed to take place. ...read more.

Conclusion

This resulted in constant frustration. Many peasants broke out their anger in many riots. A huge majority of workers went on strike and small renegade revolutionary groups who indulged in assassinations and propaganda spawned. For example, before Nicholas II, Alexander II in 1881 was assassinated by a group named The People's Will. The Tsars made many concessions, but they were never enough for the workers, peasants and educated classes, mainly because the Tsars were constantly watching out for their own absolute authority to stay in position. When Russia was weakened, it was seriously exposed to demands for improvement. Going back, the Crimean War led to Alexander II's reforms, which was later followed by many of the following Tsars. Some of the major strengths of the Tsars however, were the fact that it held up Russia's traditions, which was and is very important to a country's morale. There was much loyalty towards and between the Tsars, which led to a strong and powerful government. They had their own Army, and luckily the opposition groups were very small and divided, and caused very little threat. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Stalin man or monster

    The facial expression of the defendants looks as though they are all happy and enjoying themselves. The words such as "sure ...of course" are extremely effective reflecting as though it was too obvious for them to be guilty. The words are in capitals and explanation marks also implement the sarcastic manner.

  2. Assess the strengths & weakness of Russia around 1855

    It is also a huge negative because it makes it tremendously hard to unite the country and makes trade and exports a challenge with transport problems, again suggesting overall that this is another weakness of Russia in 1855. The backwardness of Russia is also element which is strongly indicating a weakness, due to industry remaining very low however some growth.

  1. Stalin Man or Monster

    Q6 Sources L and M are both extracts from two biographies about Stalin published about 30 years after his death. Source L is a biography published in Britain in 1983. This source is not biased to any particular side, anti or pro Stalin.

  2. What Happened To The Romanov Family?

    This ensured that the Bolsheviks were seen as great people. B) Explain why Stalin, not Trotsky, emerged as Lenin's successor. Stalin was the general secretary of the communist party. He was incredibly dull and considered humourless by other communists. He believed that Russia should build a communist state by itself without the help of other countries.

  1. What happened to the Romanov Family? Sourcework

    it says, 'see whether anyone's there and if the shots will be heard'. Guns are also mentioned in Sources A, B, C, E, G, I and J. This practically confirms that Medvedev is being truthful when he says that the Romanov's were shot.

  2. Stalin: Man or Monster?

    He tells us that Stalin has to always be best and if someone becomes better then that someone must die. It tries to put across the point that Stalin is a ruthless man and that he is narrow-minded. He states at the end of his speech that, 'he is not a man, but a devil'.

  1. How successfully did Alexander III extend his authority throughout the Russian Empire?

    authority The removal of The Zemstva caused the normally supportive, middle class to be alienated from the Tsar. However Alexander was still suspicious and strongly feared political opposition. This fear was encouraged by Pobedonastev as he had always been very wary of local governments.

  2. What Happened To The Romanov Family?

    In this information it includes how they were lined up to be killed and how the execution had taken place. It also states that they found reasonable information about the bullets and to suggest how they were killed by the bullets marks on the wall.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work