• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What were the strengths and weaknesses of the Russian monarchy in 1894?

Extracts from this document...


What were the strengths and weaknesses of the Russian monarchy in 1894? Just previous to 1894, the king was Alexander III, 49 years old. Alexander was incredibly influenced by Konstantin Pobedenestov, Procurator of the Holy Synod, who also believed in an anti-western Russia (later backed by the Slavophiles, who also disliked the Western way of life). He brought back censorship in education and he press and also produced the Russification of non nationalist groups. The reduction of peasant representation on the Zemstvo and the creation of the Land captains to restore the traditional authority within the localities were also brought into the picture by Alexander III. It was believed that he had, barring assassination, many years left to his reign. As the year went on, his health deteriorated at an alarming rate. The best doctors of the time were called to help, but none were able to save the dying Emperor. Alexander Alexandrovich Romanov, Tsar of Russia, died of Nephritis on October 20, at the summer palace in the Crimea. ...read more.


Agriculture was backward and heavily taxed, partly to finance industrialization. During Alexander III reign, the industrialisation had just taken off, which put a State investment in railroads and the steel industry. The beginnings of the foreign intervention in the Russian industry lead to much of the profits leaving the country. Russia had to become less dependent on the other European countries. The Russian monarchy in 1894 had Nicholas II as its leader, who had married Princess Alix of Hesse. Soon after he came to power, Nicholas II stated that he wished to maintain the autocratic system. He continued the suppression of opposition, the persecution of religious minorities, and the Russification of the borderlands. The revolutionary groups were rising in the dark. One of the main problems with the monarchy was their lack of attention to the poor communication problems throughout that period. This caused the Russians many problems because of the fact that once communication had reached a certain point in Russia, it was already outdated information, and too late for whatever needed to take place. ...read more.


This resulted in constant frustration. Many peasants broke out their anger in many riots. A huge majority of workers went on strike and small renegade revolutionary groups who indulged in assassinations and propaganda spawned. For example, before Nicholas II, Alexander II in 1881 was assassinated by a group named The People's Will. The Tsars made many concessions, but they were never enough for the workers, peasants and educated classes, mainly because the Tsars were constantly watching out for their own absolute authority to stay in position. When Russia was weakened, it was seriously exposed to demands for improvement. Going back, the Crimean War led to Alexander II's reforms, which was later followed by many of the following Tsars. Some of the major strengths of the Tsars however, were the fact that it held up Russia's traditions, which was and is very important to a country's morale. There was much loyalty towards and between the Tsars, which led to a strong and powerful government. They had their own Army, and luckily the opposition groups were very small and divided, and caused very little threat. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Source based questions on the Russian revolutions.

    Since source J doesn't mention the location of the shooting or when each member was shot, one could argue that these members were shot first and then later the rest of the family was shot. However, source J doesn't support the following sources well enough/ not at all however: *

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    The simple fact that he is responsible for the death of millions can only show him as nothing but a monster. Q8 There is often a disagreement about Stalin and if he was really a man or a monster. Some people believe him to be a great politician, whilst others think he used terror to overshadow his bad political skills.

  1. Stalin man or monster

    where in source I there are other judges however, in source J Stalin couldn't even trust people from his own party as he is everything, it also portrays how government used to brainwash their own citizens. To conclude this essay Both Sources are obviously very biased, as both nations were

  2. Assess the strengths & weakness of Russia around 1855

    Despite its obvious economic backwardness, which resulted in a humiliating defeat in the Crimean War (1853-56), Russia was gradually moving down the road of technical progress. In 1837 the first Russian railroad was opened. It connected St. Petersburg with the royal residence at Tzarskoye Selo (Pushkin).

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    Far from being a bloodthirsty regime of terror, the Revolution was an extraordinarily benign affair - until the counter-revolution showed its real nature. The White General P. Krasnov was one of the first to lead an uprising against the Bolsheviks at the head of the Cossacks.

  2. What Happened To The Romanov Family?

    Source C is not one sided. He tells you briefly about what Sergeyev thought. However everything he says doesn't make sense because Sergeyev says different things in the source. It also tells up totally different things to the other two sources.

  1. What happened to the Romanov Family? Sourcework

    as the disappearance of the Romanov's means that they are both primary sources. This, combined with the fact that Judge Sergeyev, upon who's account the sources are based gives us reason to believe that the sources could be slightly biased and emotional, as Sergeyev was sacked during his investigation and replaced by judge Skolov.

  2. Stalin: Man or Monster?

    Stalin also made education compulsory and free for all. However the source does not show the negative side of Stalin's industrialization. Life was very hard, factory conditions were very dangerous. Any kind of discipline problems such as lateness or absence would be punished with sacking, which could also mean the loss of homes.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work