• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What were the strengths and weaknesses of the Russian monarchy in 1894?

Extracts from this document...


What were the strengths and weaknesses of the Russian monarchy in 1894? Just previous to 1894, the king was Alexander III, 49 years old. Alexander was incredibly influenced by Konstantin Pobedenestov, Procurator of the Holy Synod, who also believed in an anti-western Russia (later backed by the Slavophiles, who also disliked the Western way of life). He brought back censorship in education and he press and also produced the Russification of non nationalist groups. The reduction of peasant representation on the Zemstvo and the creation of the Land captains to restore the traditional authority within the localities were also brought into the picture by Alexander III. It was believed that he had, barring assassination, many years left to his reign. As the year went on, his health deteriorated at an alarming rate. The best doctors of the time were called to help, but none were able to save the dying Emperor. Alexander Alexandrovich Romanov, Tsar of Russia, died of Nephritis on October 20, at the summer palace in the Crimea. ...read more.


Agriculture was backward and heavily taxed, partly to finance industrialization. During Alexander III reign, the industrialisation had just taken off, which put a State investment in railroads and the steel industry. The beginnings of the foreign intervention in the Russian industry lead to much of the profits leaving the country. Russia had to become less dependent on the other European countries. The Russian monarchy in 1894 had Nicholas II as its leader, who had married Princess Alix of Hesse. Soon after he came to power, Nicholas II stated that he wished to maintain the autocratic system. He continued the suppression of opposition, the persecution of religious minorities, and the Russification of the borderlands. The revolutionary groups were rising in the dark. One of the main problems with the monarchy was their lack of attention to the poor communication problems throughout that period. This caused the Russians many problems because of the fact that once communication had reached a certain point in Russia, it was already outdated information, and too late for whatever needed to take place. ...read more.


This resulted in constant frustration. Many peasants broke out their anger in many riots. A huge majority of workers went on strike and small renegade revolutionary groups who indulged in assassinations and propaganda spawned. For example, before Nicholas II, Alexander II in 1881 was assassinated by a group named The People's Will. The Tsars made many concessions, but they were never enough for the workers, peasants and educated classes, mainly because the Tsars were constantly watching out for their own absolute authority to stay in position. When Russia was weakened, it was seriously exposed to demands for improvement. Going back, the Crimean War led to Alexander II's reforms, which was later followed by many of the following Tsars. Some of the major strengths of the Tsars however, were the fact that it held up Russia's traditions, which was and is very important to a country's morale. There was much loyalty towards and between the Tsars, which led to a strong and powerful government. They had their own Army, and luckily the opposition groups were very small and divided, and caused very little threat. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. To what extent in the period 1906-1914 did the Russian monarchy succeed in removing ...

    According to statistics, the period 1906 to 1914 saw tremendous developments industry, however, the low base from which it started made it comparatively easy to achieve large percentage increases. Due to Stolypin's agricultural reforms there was a growing natural internal and domestic market, this improved the tension because the people saw hope for Russia.

  2. Source based questions on the Russian revolutions.

    The two children could have been killed, but then dumped somewhere else, perhaps the mine collapsed partially on them, or maybe they could have survived. Source J mentions the use of a lorry and that a mine was used to cover it up.

  1. Assess the strengths & weakness of Russia around 1855

    Despite its obvious economic backwardness, which resulted in a humiliating defeat in the Crimean War (1853-56), Russia was gradually moving down the road of technical progress. In 1837 the first Russian railroad was opened. It connected St. Petersburg with the royal residence at Tzarskoye Selo (Pushkin).

  2. How successfully did Alexander III extend his authority throughout the Russian Empire?

    The result of this was the life of the peasants worsening greatly; their lives were becoming extremely difficult as they were living in fear of eviction as redemption payments were becoming too expensive to be met. Indirect taxes on items such as tea, sugar and vodka made things even more difficult for the peasants.

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    And this mode of argument is really no different. The essential idea is that the working class is incapable of understanding its own interests (which are, naturally, identical to those of the bosses). Therefore, if they move to take their destiny into their own hands, the only explanation is that they have been misled by unscrupulous demagogues.

  2. What Happened To The Romanov Family?

    This was written before source B which states that there was no real evidence as to who or how many victims were killed. The differences between sources A and B are: 1. Source B states what happened to some of the family members: unlike source A B states what happened to certain family members.

  1. What Happened To The Romanov Family?

    Both sources contradict each other, which makes them both a bit unreliable. On the other hand, source B backs up what Sergeyev says about only some members were shot. This could mean that source C is contradicting the other two sources because it states different things.

  2. What happened to the Romanov Family? Sourcework

    spread of communism, and were involved with the Civil war in Russia. By causing the communists to look like brutal murderers the Americans could give them a bad image to prevent them from becoming popular, and boost the support for the Whites in Russia.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work