• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

WHICH ALLIANCE SYSTEM WAS THE STRONGEST IN 1914

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

WHICH ALLIANCE SYSTEM WAS THE STRONGEST IN 1914? In 1914, the six most powerful countries in Europe became two opposing alliances. The Central Powers (Triple alliance) consisted of a contracted pact between Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy in 1882, of which was followed, 25 years later, by the Triple Entente pact between Britain, France and Russia. Each country was notorious for their advanced and mass military, and the initial Central Powers alliance had installed sufficient fear and suspicion to form an Entente. Many argue there is certain evidence that The Central Powers alliance was stronger than the Triple Entente. In 1870, Germany gain hold of the flourishing Alsace-Lorraine industrial area in France, so that in 1914 German industry was the 2nd most successful in the world to U.S.A: we can therefore assume that Germany found this economically gratifying as well as having access to advanced technological machinery. ...read more.

Middle

This is another advantage for T.C.P. However, Russia has been acquiring vast armament, as is the same through out the T.E- and the up and coming country of Serbia has now become allies of Russia: this adds to T.C.P's fear of T.E's 'encirclement' strategy (in case of, T.C.P all relied on the single 'Schlieren' strategy of war plan, hoping their assumptions of the T.E's actions would be correct). Other opposed arguments to T.C.P is that the current situation within Austria-Hungary is not stable. The many nationalities inside its borders are demanding independence of some sort and this may lead to a devastating civil war (a pro for the T.E) or in the least, the country will not have a united view and this could be potentially dangerous when entering a war. Not only was Austria-Hungary in a weak position, Italy had a poor industrial and infantry power- and it didn't help T.C.P that Italy had other aims for its country as well (to build up more colonies and overseas empires) ...read more.

Conclusion

plus, Britain had always used its excuse of being overseas and majoring in the army as a way of not getting involved in any land battles).Additionally, T.C.P have a substantially bigger army that can be more easily transported within the countries, but if war was declared in the strategy of encirclement, the T.C.P is faced with a dire situation that they most likely won't win ergo this puts the T.E in control. In conclusion, I believe that T.C.P was stronger if they were the first to declare war and take the T.E by surprise. This will also weaken the T.E's strategy as they won't have the time to transport any resources to each other (as they are so far apart). Furthermore, as the T.E was at such a non-committal state there is a chance that one of the countries would pull out at any time, seriously weakening the other two's status. ?? ?? ?? ?? Katherine Rostami HISTORY GCSE 10/05/2007 - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This is a strong response that considers both sides of the argument and stays focused throughout. The analysis could have been taken further in places and the author often slips into the present tense. It could also be linked to the events of 1914 to add weight to the conclusion. 4 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 01/12/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Why Did The First World War Break Out in 1914?

    5 star(s)

    To protect its vast Empire, Britain realised that it did not have enough resources. Britain was also particularly anxious about the German navy, which was growing. Germany decided that a sturdy German naval and merchant fleet was crucial to obtain, service and defend these colonies.

  2. The Rise of Nation States in Europe

    Nation-states e.g. France, Britain, etc. * 2. Small duchies e.g. German states, Italian states, etc. * 3. Great empires e.g. Austria-Hungary, Turkish Empire, Russian Empire, etc. Independence Movements - Independence Movements happened in Europe and in the Balkans. 1. Movement in Europe a.

  1. League of Nations -aims, achievements and weaknesses.

    from the League. Another failure was when the mainly Polish City, Vilna, in Lithuania, was invaded by Poland. Lithuania appealed to the League for help, who then asked Poland to withdraw. Poland refused, therefore Poland succeeded in their aim using force (which the League was totally against), unable to be stopped by the League of Nations.

  2. Long term Causes of World War 1

    All this helped fuel the fire that was WWI. Imperialism, nationalism & alliances like the Triple Entente I think the causes of world war one were the long term causes like imperialism and nationalism. I think the main causes were the alliances like the Triple Entente.

  1. How successful was the League of Nations in the 1920s.

    This is just another example of how the countries in the League of Nations were always so selfish and self centred. The Health committee (later the world health organisation)

  2. Explain the importance of the war at sea to the final outcome of WWI

    was the main weapon in the war at sea. This was the main weapon at sea. The new and powerful Dreadnought battleships, along with other ships, were surmised by people to fight. They proved too expensive to risk against the primitive yet affective submarines. These submarines could be launched from German ports and sail underwater without drawing attention that they were even there.

  1. To what extent did the big three achieve their aims at Versailles

    Also they were not allowed tanks or submarines, and the size and number of naval ships were limited. An Anschluss (union) between Germany and Austria was forbidden.

  2. How fair is Louise Shaw's Interpretation on Chamberlain? The interpretation revolves around the idea ...

    The revisionist movement, was prominent between the 1960s-90s. Interpretations formed within this period were less harsh on Neville Chamberlain;. Many studies published share the opinion that indicates how Chamberlain did the best he could under impossibly difficult circumstances. Alternatively, some sources still held the view that Chaimberlain was too confident

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work