• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Which factor contributed more to the weakness of the League of Nations, its membership or its organisation and peacekeeping powers?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Which factor contributed more to the weakness of the League of Nations, its membership or its organisation and peacekeeping powers? Both factors contributed to the weakness of the League of Nations. Firstly, membership was one of the major weakness of the League, as the two most powerful nations, America and USSR did not join the League. This forced Britain and France to lead the League when they did not want to join in the first place. Because of the lack of committment, it was foreseeable that they would not put the interest of the League before their self interest in times of crisis. Therefore it was not surprising to see that they did not try hard (i.e. economic sanction was not imposed) to stop Japan from taking Manchuria from China as they were struggling in the Depression at that time and they had no interest in Manchuria, especially when France was playing close attention to the rise of Hitler in Germany. The reactions were similar when Italy invaded Abyssinia (i.e. Britain and France did not closethe Suez Canal and stop Italy from transporting weapons to Africa ) ...read more.


But the organisation and peacekeeping powers of the League of Nations was also an important reason for the weakness of the League. First of all, the League did not have an army of its own and had to rely on members to donate troops in times of crisis. This undermined its power against aggression as potential aggressors were less afraid of the military sanction of the League, since individual countries might not be willing to donate troops. If no country donate troops, then military force could not be carried out at all, for example, even leading members like Britain and France refused to donate troops in the Manchurian crisis as they were at the height of Depression and the distance to China was too far; so no military force could be carried out. They also refused to use their colonial troops in Africa against Italy out of concerns of self interest. Therefore no military force was imposed again. But in fact the peacekeeping power of the League relied too much on the goodwill of the members in the first place. ...read more.


Having America and USSR in the League could at least, to some degree, make up for the weakness of the League not having its own army and the Court not having the power to enforce decisions as they could also offer a lot of resources (i.e. money and military) to the League. This could make the aggressors less likely to invade other countries. This is because both economic sanctions and military force would be easier to carry out as America and USSR were major trading partners of many countries and not many countries could afford fighting with them. Moreover, self interest, one of the root causes for the failure of the League, could be reduced as the committment and goodwill of the members were likely to be increased if America and USSR joined. Britain and France would feel less ?forced? to take the lead and there would be a higher hope for the League to succeed, so members might be more willing to sacrifice, increasing the speed of the decision-making processes. This makes the problems with membership more important than the organization and peacekeeping powers because economic sanctions and military force were, arguably, the most important weapons the League had to defend collective security. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    There was no question of who was going to win. One of the main reasons for this was that the league was at least seen to do the right thing in the Manchurian crisis as they condemned Japan for invading and although they didn't do anything about it they did, in the end, came to the right decision.

  2. Why America didn't join the league of nations.

    Failed to block off the Suez Canal. Secret dealing between Britain, France and Italy to give Italy 2/3 of Abyssinia if he called of the attack. [The Laval-Hoare Pact] Details leaked to press - disaster - sacked. America disgusted by league and stepped up oil exports to Italy.


    first case when the original constitution of the League was broken and an allied city lost it's independence'. Thucydides suggests that the revolts such as those undertaken by Carystus and Naxos were due to the harsh system of finances used to support the league - 'The chief reasons for these

  2. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    However, in the Abyssinian crisis they didn't condemn Italy in fact they came to an agreement with them that basically gave them what they wanted. So they were seen to be giving into the demands of the aggressor. Not only did they give into Italy but the two main powers

  1. 'The rise and decline of the great powers can be explained by their relative ...

    Japan at this time was also economically stable, and used this to their advantage when deciding to modernise the country in 1853 to safeguard against attack, after a warship landed in Yokahama harbour. In stark contrast, both Russia and Turkey were based on a feudal peasant system and had poor economies.

  2. The League of Nations

    He did not believe that the war should end in a new balance of power, but rather in an organized common peace. In other words, he wanted "peace without victory". His biggest step towards this ultimate goal was the Treaty of Versailles containing fourteen points, of which the fourteenth consisted of a League of Nations to settle international disputes.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work