• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Which factor contributed more to the weakness of the League of Nations, its membership or its organisation and peacekeeping powers?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Which factor contributed more to the weakness of the League of Nations, its membership or its organisation and peacekeeping powers? Both factors contributed to the weakness of the League of Nations. Firstly, membership was one of the major weakness of the League, as the two most powerful nations, America and USSR did not join the League. This forced Britain and France to lead the League when they did not want to join in the first place. Because of the lack of committment, it was foreseeable that they would not put the interest of the League before their self interest in times of crisis. Therefore it was not surprising to see that they did not try hard (i.e. economic sanction was not imposed) to stop Japan from taking Manchuria from China as they were struggling in the Depression at that time and they had no interest in Manchuria, especially when France was playing close attention to the rise of Hitler in Germany. The reactions were similar when Italy invaded Abyssinia (i.e. Britain and France did not closethe Suez Canal and stop Italy from transporting weapons to Africa ) ...read more.


But the organisation and peacekeeping powers of the League of Nations was also an important reason for the weakness of the League. First of all, the League did not have an army of its own and had to rely on members to donate troops in times of crisis. This undermined its power against aggression as potential aggressors were less afraid of the military sanction of the League, since individual countries might not be willing to donate troops. If no country donate troops, then military force could not be carried out at all, for example, even leading members like Britain and France refused to donate troops in the Manchurian crisis as they were at the height of Depression and the distance to China was too far; so no military force could be carried out. They also refused to use their colonial troops in Africa against Italy out of concerns of self interest. Therefore no military force was imposed again. But in fact the peacekeeping power of the League relied too much on the goodwill of the members in the first place. ...read more.


Having America and USSR in the League could at least, to some degree, make up for the weakness of the League not having its own army and the Court not having the power to enforce decisions as they could also offer a lot of resources (i.e. money and military) to the League. This could make the aggressors less likely to invade other countries. This is because both economic sanctions and military force would be easier to carry out as America and USSR were major trading partners of many countries and not many countries could afford fighting with them. Moreover, self interest, one of the root causes for the failure of the League, could be reduced as the committment and goodwill of the members were likely to be increased if America and USSR joined. Britain and France would feel less ?forced? to take the lead and there would be a higher hope for the League to succeed, so members might be more willing to sacrifice, increasing the speed of the decision-making processes. This makes the problems with membership more important than the organization and peacekeeping powers because economic sanctions and military force were, arguably, the most important weapons the League had to defend collective security. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays


    However, Athens had abandoned her allies who were still at war in Cyprus and Egypt. Despite this newly established peace, hostility continued to pressurise the allies and the contribution of tributes had to persist. It was possible that the allies refused to pay these contributions now that peace was established.

  2. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    left in the league were seen to have secret meetings with Italy. This greatly undermined the belief in the league. Also, people in Europe thought that Japan was so far away from them that they didn't need to worry too much about what occurred somewhere on the other side of the world.

  1. The League of Nations

    Countries were even less likely to obey and help out the League if they were suffering from economic troubles at home as well. The Manchurian crisis was a result of the depression; Japan relied on trade with America which had obviously been cut off by the depression so Japan marched into Manchuria to gain more resources.

  2. Why America didn't join the league of nations.

    Britain and France didn't take it seriously and played for time. They wanted to keep on the good side of Mussolini. Mussolini launched attack (large attacking small). League decided to impose sanctions but delayed oil imports for 2 months. Failed to block off the Suez Canal.

  1. Japanese Invade Manchuria

    Alternatively, the League of Nations also had its down falls. In the 1920's it tried to encourage disarmament. Even Britain and France ONLY agreed to limit the size of their navies. This did not show any fairness in the League; so it is likely that all other countries would not disarm allow either.

  2. 'The rise and decline of the great powers can be explained by their relative ...

    well as allowing the rise of Hitler as a radical solution to the problem. This also demonstrates the weakness of the German government to manage and control the crisis and shows its instability, which would have made it almost impossible for it to have worldwide influence as a power at that time.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work