• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Which factor contributed more to the weakness of the League of Nations, its membership or its organisation and peacekeeping powers?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Which factor contributed more to the weakness of the League of Nations, its membership or its organisation and peacekeeping powers? Both factors contributed to the weakness of the League of Nations. Firstly, membership was one of the major weakness of the League, as the two most powerful nations, America and USSR did not join the League. This forced Britain and France to lead the League when they did not want to join in the first place. Because of the lack of committment, it was foreseeable that they would not put the interest of the League before their self interest in times of crisis. Therefore it was not surprising to see that they did not try hard (i.e. economic sanction was not imposed) to stop Japan from taking Manchuria from China as they were struggling in the Depression at that time and they had no interest in Manchuria, especially when France was playing close attention to the rise of Hitler in Germany. The reactions were similar when Italy invaded Abyssinia (i.e. Britain and France did not closethe Suez Canal and stop Italy from transporting weapons to Africa ) ...read more.


But the organisation and peacekeeping powers of the League of Nations was also an important reason for the weakness of the League. First of all, the League did not have an army of its own and had to rely on members to donate troops in times of crisis. This undermined its power against aggression as potential aggressors were less afraid of the military sanction of the League, since individual countries might not be willing to donate troops. If no country donate troops, then military force could not be carried out at all, for example, even leading members like Britain and France refused to donate troops in the Manchurian crisis as they were at the height of Depression and the distance to China was too far; so no military force could be carried out. They also refused to use their colonial troops in Africa against Italy out of concerns of self interest. Therefore no military force was imposed again. But in fact the peacekeeping power of the League relied too much on the goodwill of the members in the first place. ...read more.


Having America and USSR in the League could at least, to some degree, make up for the weakness of the League not having its own army and the Court not having the power to enforce decisions as they could also offer a lot of resources (i.e. money and military) to the League. This could make the aggressors less likely to invade other countries. This is because both economic sanctions and military force would be easier to carry out as America and USSR were major trading partners of many countries and not many countries could afford fighting with them. Moreover, self interest, one of the root causes for the failure of the League, could be reduced as the committment and goodwill of the members were likely to be increased if America and USSR joined. Britain and France would feel less ?forced? to take the lead and there would be a higher hope for the League to succeed, so members might be more willing to sacrifice, increasing the speed of the decision-making processes. This makes the problems with membership more important than the organization and peacekeeping powers because economic sanctions and military force were, arguably, the most important weapons the League had to defend collective security. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Why America didn't join the league of nations.

    Hitler marched into Rhineland March 1936. France now wanted Italy as an ally. May 1936 Italy had taken Abyssinia's capital. COLLECTIVE SECURITY + LEAGUE OF NATIONS FAILED Why did the League of Nations fail? The League had social successes in the 1920's and solved several disputes but it was a failure in the 1930's.

  2. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    left in the league were seen to have secret meetings with Italy. This greatly undermined the belief in the league. Also, people in Europe thought that Japan was so far away from them that they didn't need to worry too much about what occurred somewhere on the other side of the world.


    A similar case had occurred after the battle of Eurymedon in 468 BC, when Athens had used the riches won after the battle to rebuild her city. It is possible that she may have been compensating herself for her losses during the earlier conflict with Sparta.

  2. The League of Nations

    Without the power and authority of America, Italy wasn't afraid of the League's ruling. As well as this, trade sanctions that were imposed were ineffective because America was still trading with Italy and giving her oil to run her tanks, etc on.

  1. Great Depression

    1933, the USSR did not join until 1934 whilst Japan left in 1933 and Italy in 1937. Without these major countries, the League lacked authority. There was a lack of troops, the League did not have its own army and so it relied in the co-operation of its members.

  2. 'The rise and decline of the great powers can be explained by their relative ...

    This was due partially to the expense of war, but mainly to the reparations demanded by the Treaty of Versailles. This plummet in the economy caused mass unemployment, devaluation of currency and hardship nationwide. It also put a great strain on relations between Britain, Russia and France and Germany, as

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work