• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Which Had A greater impact on the Second World War

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Which had a greater impact on the start of the Second World War? * The Treaty Of Versailles * Chamberlains Policy of Appeasement After the First World War moods in Europe weren't very happy as the majority of countries were left damaged by the scale of the war. Germany was forced to surrender therefore for victory was achieved for the French and British. After the Great War a settlement was made which was The Treaty of Versailles which was aimed at Germany, some critics say that it was very severe and harsh towards Germany as they were left segregated and weak without any power, the treaty had dented Germany which all of the European countries wanted. This treaty was the only way to stop Germany and most people in Britain and France wanted revenge. Germany lost most of its empire and was now called Mandates as they were now run by the LON. They also forced to pay �6.6 billion in reparations for the damaged it caused. When the treaty was put into action no one new how it would affect the future of Europe in a drastic way when Adolph Hitler would come into action. He wanted to reverse the results of Treaty of Versailles and put Germany back on the map. However the British prime Minster tried to appease him and give him what he wanted like land and an army but this still didn't work and Germany grew bigger and stronger until it leaded to the Second World War. ...read more.

Middle

As Hitler built up his foundations and security it created tensions around Europe as many countries thought that war was going to break out again. However other countries were also building up there armed forces to prepare if another war broke out, and as we know it did as it was expected, it could be said here that Germany could've been stopped when it was building up its forces however all the nation and countries were cowards therefore they let Hitler do what they wanted. The treaty just made matters worse as Hitler wanted what belonged to him however it was taken away from him by the treaty therefore he would go to any length to get it back and restore power and glory in Germany. Due to the treaty a lot of land and colonies were lost, in total it lost 10% of its land in Europe, along with 12.5% of it population and !6% of it coalfields and also 50% of it iron and steel industries. Won of it major losses were Alsace-Lorraine West Prussia (Polish Corridor). In contest Hitler wanted to regain the lost territories and land such as the Polish Corridor and the Sudetenland which was apart of Czechoslovakia now. First his main aim was to get back the Sudetenland as the majority of people living there were German, he would eventually want the whole of Czechoslovakia. ...read more.

Conclusion

Chamberlains policy of appeasement and the treaty of Versailles were to big impacts on the start of the Second World War. In my eyes I think that the Treaty was the bigger impact than appeasement because if this wasn't put into action appeasement would have never been used and the Second World War wouldn't have begun. The treaty was harsh on the Germans therefore they wanted revenge and Hitler was there to do o and restore Germany's glory. However even so if Britain and France tried to stop him breaking the terms of the treaty then there would be no need for appeasement anyway and WW2. However on the other hand appeasement had been working in the eyes of the public as they thought that Hitler had no intention of war. It came to a point were Hitler couldn't be appeased as he just took control and advantage when crossed the line. The treaty of Versailles to some critics was to harsh and unfair as it left the Germans weak and resentful, this is why it lead to anger and a Second World War this was predicted even when the treaty clauses were released and it became true. This is why Hitler took revenge and tried to restore Germany and its belongings. However there was some advantage in appeasement as it bought time for Britain and France to prepare for the outbreak of war. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    Therefore, throughout the 1920's, in nearly all parts of the Treaty, the terms were carried out. It was after 1933, that there was a systematic breaking of the terms when the Nazis came to power. The other peace settlements It is often forgotten, that with the energy put into the

  2. To what extent was Hitler to blame for WW2?

    This provided Hitler with the capability as well as the motivation provided by other themes to invade Poland, then France and finally the USSR. The influence that alliances had on the decisions of different nations also contributed towards World War II.

  1. Was Hitler the cause of WW2? A.J.P Taylor wrote the controversial The origins ...

    led to other problems and encouraged the rise of powerful nationalist dictators and militaristic governments prepared to ignore the League and to use force. The weakness of the League of Nations was a major cause of the Second World War because if it had worked, then there would have been

  2. Causes of World War 2

    Hitler saw such golden opportunities unfold. Chamberlain of Britain had continuously agreed with giving Hitler land in the policy of appeasement when the Sudetenland and the Rhineland were taken over by Hitler. Clearly when Czechoslovakia was finally taken over by Hitler Chamberlain was no longer seen as a good leader of Britain anymore.

  1. Was the Policy of Appeasement correct?

    Hitler had clearly learned from this mistake, and this pact is an aggressive move towards Britain and France showing that Hitler is ready to fight a war with them. After this indication that a war is imminent, appeasement cannot be the right policy.

  2. Questions on World War One.

    They were in the fear of being attacked. So the alliance was the seeking for security, not war. - Fear of the Englishmen about a new balance of power in Europe had compel them into making a new mind of finding allies.

  1. Dear Diary, It was the start of the Christmas month and I was ready ...

    In some parts the water reached waist height. This is what people were seeing and thinking and now I also fear. Day 3 - 25/12/1914 Dear Diary, Today was Christmas day and all soldiers received a Christmas gift box and it was contributed by the 'Sailors and Soldiers Christmas Fund' set up by Princess Mary.

  2. History Revision notes - International Relations: Why did WW2 break out? 1929-1939

    Furthermore, in September 1935, a speech was made by British foreign secretary, Sir Samuel Hoare, to the assembly of the League calling for collective resistance to Italian aggression. However, this seems to have made little difference to events. In October 1935, the Italian forces invaded Abyssinia.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work