• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Which of the following reasons are more responsible for the failure of the League of Nations: The absence of the USA from the League of Nations The actions of Britain and France during the Abyssinian crisis. You must refer to both reasons when explaining your answer.

Extracts from this document...

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. What were the consequences of the failure of the league in the 1930s?

    In December 1935 again private treaties/deals were taking place between France, Italy and Britain. This included the giving of two thirds of Abyssinia to Mussolini to stop invading. The plans were leaked to the press, causing great embarrassment to Laval and Hoare, the British and French ministers involved in the Abyssinian crisis.

  2. The failure of the League of Nations

    America was not the only important country absent from the league Germany was not a member until 1926 and left in 1937.The USSR did not join until 1934 whilst Japan left in 1933 and Italy in 1937. Without such important powers the league lacked the power to enforce it decisions and sanctions.

  1. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    Another reason why the Abyssinian crisis was a death blow to the league and the Manchurian crisis was not is because France and Britain could have at least done something to stop the Abyssinian crisis by closing the Suez Canal, they couldn't have done much to stop the Manchurian crisis

  2. Was the league of nations a complete failure?

    The Italians had previously tried to take over Abyssinia in 1896 but had been humiliatingly defeated in the Battle of Adowa. After this Mussolini, the Italian dictator had become eager for revenge and it soon became clear that he was preparing for war despite the fact that there was a

  1. Weaknesses of League of Nations

    They had the power to punish any aggressors through a variety of sanctions; economic, military, political and moral. However, this armada of "weapons" were rendered ineffective by the lack of willingness of the members. They were afraid that their own countries would suffer as a result of contributing in sanctioning the aggressor.

  2. How far was the League of Nations a complete failure?

    Unanimous decisions and a weak structure paralysed the League. This also meant that powerful members within the Council could vote against sanctions placed on them.

  1. The League of Nations: Its achievements and its failures

    as Chancellor of Germany at the end of January, and he immediately starts to secretly rearm Germany.May 1933: Hitler promised not to rearm Germany if ?in five years all other nations destroyed their arms?.June 1933: Britain produced an ambitious disarmament plan.

  2. How did the weakness of the League of Nations and the effect of the ...

    the other countries had not been made to disarm then they didn?t have to either. In 1932 an agreement was finally made to treat Germany equally. But when Hitler became Chancellor he secretly began rearming Germany. Hitler had already made it clear that rearmament was one of his major aims.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work