• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Which of the following reasons are more responsible for the failure of the League of Nations: The absence of the USA from the League of Nations The actions of Britain and France during the Abyssinian crisis. You must refer to both reasons when explaining your answer.

Extracts from this document...

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. The failure of the League of Nations

    America was not the only important country absent from the league Germany was not a member until 1926 and left in 1937.The USSR did not join until 1934 whilst Japan left in 1933 and Italy in 1937. Without such important powers the league lacked the power to enforce it decisions and sanctions.

  2. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    Another reason why the Abyssinian crisis was a death blow to the league and the Manchurian crisis was not is because France and Britain could have at least done something to stop the Abyssinian crisis by closing the Suez Canal, they couldn't have done much to stop the Manchurian crisis

  1. Weaknesses of League of Nations

    They had the power to punish any aggressors through a variety of sanctions; economic, military, political and moral. However, this armada of "weapons" were rendered ineffective by the lack of willingness of the members. They were afraid that their own countries would suffer as a result of contributing in sanctioning the aggressor.

  2. Was the league of nations a complete failure?

    The Italians had previously tried to take over Abyssinia in 1896 but had been humiliatingly defeated in the Battle of Adowa. After this Mussolini, the Italian dictator had become eager for revenge and it soon became clear that he was preparing for war despite the fact that there was a


    By dropping iron weights into the sea, the oath was symbolic that Athens' reign of leadership was permanent. Athens stood faithfully by this oath, even when Persia was finally defeated at Eurymedon in 468 BC. This meant that the league no longer had a purpose, yet Athens began to show

  2. The League of Nations

    However these countries did not join and again this contributed the failure of the league, as non-members, they could and did trade with countries facing League sanctions and therefore to a certain extent it was in their own interests to remain detached from such a commitment as the League.

  1. The League of Nations

    To make matters even worse both countries had other priorities. France was still petrified of Germany and Britain had to look after their Empire. Despite America decision to drop out of the League before it even started, it still went ahead.

  2. The League of Nations: Its achievements and its failures

    January 1935 to October 1935, Mussolini was supposedly negotiating with the League while shipping off men to Africa, and also inspiring the Italian people with images of glory and conquest.The British and the French failed to take the situation seriously, they were only playing for time as they were desperate

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work