• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Which of these Sources is most useful to an Historian studying the deaths of the Tsar and his family?

Extracts from this document...


Which of these Sources is most useful to an Historian studying the deaths of the Tsar and his family? Source F is a photograph of the basement room where the family murders are supposed to have taken place. Photo graphs are usually useful to a historian as he is able to interpret independently what happened. He can deduct from the picture that there was shooting as he can see that there are bullet holes in the wall. This is useful to the historian studying the deaths of the Tsar and his family as he can see exactly how they were killed. The photograph is made more reliable as it is supported by other sources: A, B and C as they all agree that the victims were killed by "shooting" and in the "basement". Source F is further supported by both picture sources, G and H. Source G is a painting of the deaths of the Imperial family, based on D, the investigation carried out by the Whites Source G supports F in that it shows that the shooting took place in the same room (we can tell this, as the door and the walls are in the same position) ...read more.


However this Source would be useful to the historian studying the deaths as he can see how they died, and their relative positions. It is supported by both Sources F and G in some aspects as it shows that shooting took place, and that the positions are the same- i.e. by the storeroom. It is supported by both source A and B as it shows the Tsar "kneeling down" like it says in Source B and also that some of the family were not killed their as the Tsarina and the daughters don't look as if they are being shot at in Source G. Source H is a diagram of Room the Romanov family were killed and their positions from a book written by Judge Sokolov. It might not be accurate as he wasn't there himself. It is not very useful to the Historian studying their deaths as it doesn't indicate who exactly was killed (if they were killed) and who is who, it only shows a general picture with the black dots being representative of everyone: the doctor, the maid, the servants and the family, it would be unuseful for the historian studying the Tsar and his family's death, as he would not be able to differentiate between The maids position or the Tsars position. ...read more.


also, he cannot have obtained this information from D. It is also unclear exactly who was shot, or whether there were any survivors as Source A suggests. Out of all these sources However, Source F would have been the most useful to the Historian studying the Tsar and the family's deaths. This is because it is a photograph so there is no chance of bias or lying: he can see for himself exactly what happened, though one photograph can be interpreted in different ways. It is supported by 5 sources making it very credible and reliable for the Historian if he was using it as a source. Source F also establishes the method applied, i.e. shooting. But like sources G and H this source is ambiguous as it does not identify who the victims were (if there were any) It is only "claimed" that the Tsar and the Royal family were killed here. I believe that none of these Sources can be useful to the Historian studying the Deaths of the Tsar and the Royal Family on their own, however they could be used in support of or reinforcement of other sources and accounts of the Tsar and the Families murder. ?? ?? ?? ?? History-Hareem Bhatti-Sutton Grammar school 1 Hareem Bhatti 10v ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    Liu Shaoqi was promoted to the post of "state chairman" to clean up the mess, with Mao's personal backing. Through the implementation of Liu's policy of "three freedoms and one contract" (extension of plots of land for private production, free markets, increase of private enterprises with sole responsibility for their

  2. Source A is a report from an American newspaper and it tells us that ...

    Sources B, C, D and F all state that this [the basement] was the location of the murder(s) and that the Tsar was killed. This source can be useful to a historian as an example of propaganda sent out after the murder of the Tsar; they have exaggerated the events

  1. Stalin - Man or Monster? - Sources Questions

    Capitalist country whereas sources B and C were both created by individuals from a communist country. Source A is totally fictional because such pyramids did not exist whereas sources B and C are both based on reality (the dam in the background of B and the fact that source C is a photograph).

  2. Stalin: Man or Monster - Sources Questions

    them; this is proven by him in his story when he alone cares for the drowned man. The source is written in 1945; which is during the time that Stalin wanted to be popular amongst the Russian people, to be able to stay firmly in power, and therefore we see he used manipulation as a tool.

  1. What Happened To The Romanov Family?

    This shows that some parts of the book and his finding might not have been true. On the other hand, it could mean that someone might not have wanted people to find out the truth behind his findings. The source was produced some years later after the murder.

  2. What happened to the Romanov Family? Sourcework

    Making people feel content and secure in their own country is the most effective way of reducing the support for extreme measures such as communist revolutions. Source B is slightly more reliable in this respect, as the source is a high profile report, written by a British diplomat, intended for the government intelligence, as opposed to the public.

  1. What Happened to the Romanov Family? - source related study

    This and other references between the two sources back each other up, meaning that the two sources are more likely to be reliable, as each can evidence each other. On the other hand it could be that both are unreliable.

  2. What Happened To The Romanov Family?

    These five people were Tsar, family doctor; two servants and maid were shot in the impative house. These people may be similar in both the sources as they were investigated by Sergeyev. I don't think that this point to how many and who were killed by Sergeyev was reliable because

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work