• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Which of these Sources is most useful to an Historian studying the deaths of the Tsar and his family?

Extracts from this document...


Which of these Sources is most useful to an Historian studying the deaths of the Tsar and his family? Source F is a photograph of the basement room where the family murders are supposed to have taken place. Photo graphs are usually useful to a historian as he is able to interpret independently what happened. He can deduct from the picture that there was shooting as he can see that there are bullet holes in the wall. This is useful to the historian studying the deaths of the Tsar and his family as he can see exactly how they were killed. The photograph is made more reliable as it is supported by other sources: A, B and C as they all agree that the victims were killed by "shooting" and in the "basement". Source F is further supported by both picture sources, G and H. Source G is a painting of the deaths of the Imperial family, based on D, the investigation carried out by the Whites Source G supports F in that it shows that the shooting took place in the same room (we can tell this, as the door and the walls are in the same position) ...read more.


However this Source would be useful to the historian studying the deaths as he can see how they died, and their relative positions. It is supported by both Sources F and G in some aspects as it shows that shooting took place, and that the positions are the same- i.e. by the storeroom. It is supported by both source A and B as it shows the Tsar "kneeling down" like it says in Source B and also that some of the family were not killed their as the Tsarina and the daughters don't look as if they are being shot at in Source G. Source H is a diagram of Room the Romanov family were killed and their positions from a book written by Judge Sokolov. It might not be accurate as he wasn't there himself. It is not very useful to the Historian studying their deaths as it doesn't indicate who exactly was killed (if they were killed) and who is who, it only shows a general picture with the black dots being representative of everyone: the doctor, the maid, the servants and the family, it would be unuseful for the historian studying the Tsar and his family's death, as he would not be able to differentiate between The maids position or the Tsars position. ...read more.


also, he cannot have obtained this information from D. It is also unclear exactly who was shot, or whether there were any survivors as Source A suggests. Out of all these sources However, Source F would have been the most useful to the Historian studying the Tsar and the family's deaths. This is because it is a photograph so there is no chance of bias or lying: he can see for himself exactly what happened, though one photograph can be interpreted in different ways. It is supported by 5 sources making it very credible and reliable for the Historian if he was using it as a source. Source F also establishes the method applied, i.e. shooting. But like sources G and H this source is ambiguous as it does not identify who the victims were (if there were any) It is only "claimed" that the Tsar and the Royal family were killed here. I believe that none of these Sources can be useful to the Historian studying the Deaths of the Tsar and the Royal Family on their own, however they could be used in support of or reinforcement of other sources and accounts of the Tsar and the Families murder. ?? ?? ?? ?? History-Hareem Bhatti-Sutton Grammar school 1 Hareem Bhatti 10v ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    In 1956, on the pretext of promoting the progress of science, Mao Zedong called on intellectuals to "let a hundred flowers bloom, and a hundred schools of thought contend" in the arts and sciences. Heated discussions exposed conflicts that had long existed between intellectuals and the Chinese communist regime, and feelings ran high in Beijing.

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    In truth, those under the command of Stalin would probably have had more compassion for the people than he did. People at the time would have probably just of thought that since Stalin had vastly improved Russia's international stance that everything he said was the truth.

  1. Source A is a report from an American newspaper and it tells us that ...

    However, after reading and analysing source E, I believe this source makes me trust Medvedev less as chances are that he and his wife were interviewed separately thus they didn't talk over their stories in order for them to match.

  2. Stalin - Man or Monster? - Sources Questions

    The dam is shown in the painting was regarded as essential to achieve this goal. This source shows Stalin as being a man and not a monster. Source C is a photograph showing Stalin as popular because there are many outstretched hands, which are trying to shake hands with Stalin.

  1. Stalin: Man or Monster - Sources Questions

    Even though this source is mainly a story with a moral in it, told by Stalin probably for propaganda usage it does provide some useful evidence about Stalin and the type of a man he was. Based on this source, one can assume that Stalin was a paranoid man; constantly

  2. What Happened To The Romanov Family?

    Both sources contradict each other, which makes them both a bit unreliable. On the other hand, source B backs up what Sergeyev says about only some members were shot. This could mean that source C is contradicting the other two sources because it states different things.

  1. What happened to the Romanov Family? Sourcework

    The Romanov's were killed during the communist revolution, and it was almost certain at the time that this was the work of Bolshevik communists. Source A is from a report in an American newspaper. This source is likely to be biased, as the American leaders greatly opposed and feared the

  2. What Happened to the Romanov Family? - source related study

    Sources A and B back each other up because they sate the same things and draw many of the same conclusions. For instance they both state that only "The tsar, the family doctor, two servants, and the maid were shot in the Ipatieve house."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work