• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

which of these sources would a historian studying kristallnacht find the more useful?

Extracts from this document...


History Coursework - which of these sources would a historian studying kristallnacht find the more useful? Looking at source A and considering not only its accuracy and reliability but also its provenance it is easy to see that this source is highly reliable. This is due to the writer and also cross referencing this account with various other sources. The writer, Fritz Hesse, was a journalist at during the reign of Hitler who worked for the Nazis. So not would a journalist be trained to pick up information and take notes of significant events, of which kristallnacht was one, he would also have had these notes to recall his memory when his account of the events was later written in 1954. ...read more.


I also know from looking at other sources and information about the Nazis that it would have been impossible for this journalist to write that account in the Nazis reign for fear of being arrested and put into a concentration camp or being beaten and tortured. The source says that fritz wrote in his account what he heard on that night, this implies that he was there. He also says that the Nazis 'claimed it was spontaneous rioting', this says it was a planned attack that the Nazis tried to cover up and hide. ...read more.


This source says that the riots had already begun when the news reached Goebbels and Hitler and it was decided that the demonstrations where 'not to be organized by the party, but neither where they to be discouraged if the started spontaneously'. This contradicts what is said in source A however the reliability of this source is far lower than source A. Looking at the 2 sources objectively I think that the first source would be more helpful due to the writer and from cross referencing it with my own knowledge and making a comparison. However I feel that source B is still very helpful because it can be used to show what the Nazis where trying to do and what image they wanted portrayed to the German people. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. The Rebecca Riots

    It shows the gaps between tenants and landowners, e.g. the landowners spoke in English and they were well educated - welsh farmers were the opposite of this. The landowners controlled the local government and many were magistrates. This shows that the landowners were of a higher class and had more control with the justice in the area.

  2. How useful is a visit to the Tudor parts of Hampton Court to find ...

    The Great Hall took four years to build and it was massive; thirty metres long and eighteen metres high. The size was necessary for all the banquets and other entertainments that the royal court and visitors enjoyed. The hammer beam roof in the Great Hall is really impressive with the carved and painted wood.

  1. How useful is visible evidence in explaining the development of power at Styal Mill ...

    So overall, visible evidence can be useful, giving a greater insight into physical features and basic information. How reliable is visible evidence? Visible evidence can be reliable because of the large amount of evidence it can offer us. For example, in waterpower alone I saw multiple things that showed me waterpower was used.

  2. How useful are the sources A-I to a historian studying the main causes and ...

    This source is quite useful in explaining the causes and events of Tiananmen Square. Source F, the events of the 4th June 1989 from the book China, A New Revolution? Written in 1990 by John Bradley, an American historian. This source gives a brief explanation of the events on June 4th.

  1. Battlefields Coursework

    5-12 people in it, which just shows the enormity of the loss of life. The cemetery at Notre Dame de Lorette is one of the largest cemeteries in terms of land, holding 45,000 men, 23,000 unknown soldiers in 32 acres of land.

  2. A historian must combine the rigor of a scientist with the imagination of the ...

    Many scientists would certainly approve this method. Historians on the other hand argue it is a mistake to use this way of knowing in history, the study of mankind. Historians unlike Scientists must rely on intuition and creativity of to recreate the events of the past.

  1. History of Medicine Revision Notes.

    This happened in 1847 1. It was extremely popular with surgeons UNTIL 1900 where people realized it could damage the liver ? surgeons started using Ether again Factors, which led to the discovery of Anaesthetics: 1. Need: Many people were still feeling pain during operations in the 18th century and

  2. Life In The Trenches - research and evaluation of the sources

    The poster also shows the bayonet (in the soldier?s hand). Daily Routines of the Trench Stood to at 2.30am. On fatigues all day but things fairly quiet. Heavy shelling in reserves. Stand to from 7.30 to 8.30. Everything going good and not losing any sleep."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work