• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

which of these sources would a historian studying kristallnacht find the more useful?

Extracts from this document...


History Coursework - which of these sources would a historian studying kristallnacht find the more useful? Looking at source A and considering not only its accuracy and reliability but also its provenance it is easy to see that this source is highly reliable. This is due to the writer and also cross referencing this account with various other sources. The writer, Fritz Hesse, was a journalist at during the reign of Hitler who worked for the Nazis. So not would a journalist be trained to pick up information and take notes of significant events, of which kristallnacht was one, he would also have had these notes to recall his memory when his account of the events was later written in 1954. ...read more.


I also know from looking at other sources and information about the Nazis that it would have been impossible for this journalist to write that account in the Nazis reign for fear of being arrested and put into a concentration camp or being beaten and tortured. The source says that fritz wrote in his account what he heard on that night, this implies that he was there. He also says that the Nazis 'claimed it was spontaneous rioting', this says it was a planned attack that the Nazis tried to cover up and hide. ...read more.


This source says that the riots had already begun when the news reached Goebbels and Hitler and it was decided that the demonstrations where 'not to be organized by the party, but neither where they to be discouraged if the started spontaneously'. This contradicts what is said in source A however the reliability of this source is far lower than source A. Looking at the 2 sources objectively I think that the first source would be more helpful due to the writer and from cross referencing it with my own knowledge and making a comparison. However I feel that source B is still very helpful because it can be used to show what the Nazis where trying to do and what image they wanted portrayed to the German people. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. The Rebecca Riots

    It's the pure opinion of an angry farmer. It's biased by omission because it doesn't say why the farmers were treated in this way. It is biased because it's from the point of view of a farmer, it's not neutral evidence, but it is reliable in the sense that is shows us how farmers felt at the time.

  2. How useful is visible evidence in explaining the development of power at Styal Mill ...

    So overall, visible evidence can be useful, giving a greater insight into physical features and basic information. How reliable is visible evidence? Visible evidence can be reliable because of the large amount of evidence it can offer us. For example, in waterpower alone I saw multiple things that showed me waterpower was used.

  1. How useful is a visit to the Tudor parts of Hampton Court to find ...

    These changes mean that although the visit is useful it is not exactly how the palace was and therefore we can not get a full picture of what Henry's palace was like. As new owners took over the palace they added there mark to Hampton Court and this led to less and less of it being like it originally was.

  2. How useful are the sources A-I to a historian studying the main causes and ...

    This source is quite useful in explaining the causes and events of Tiananmen Square. Source F, the events of the 4th June 1989 from the book China, A New Revolution? Written in 1990 by John Bradley, an American historian. This source gives a brief explanation of the events on June 4th.

  1. Battlefields Coursework

    Out of the 44,000 burials here in this German cemetery, 25,000 of them are in the Kameradengrab, or mass grave. There was no room in the plot of land given to them to bury each person individually, and, even though those in the Kameradengrab were unidentifiable, each individual grave has

  2. A historian must combine the rigor of a scientist with the imagination of the ...

    Many scientists would certainly approve this method. Historians on the other hand argue it is a mistake to use this way of knowing in history, the study of mankind. Historians unlike Scientists must rely on intuition and creativity of to recreate the events of the past.

  1. History of Medicine Revision Notes.

    This happened in 1847 1. It was extremely popular with surgeons UNTIL 1900 where people realized it could damage the liver ? surgeons started using Ether again Factors, which led to the discovery of Anaesthetics: 1. Need: Many people were still feeling pain during operations in the 18th century and

  2. Life In The Trenches - research and evaluation of the sources

    Also, this diary was not sold to make the soldier a profit, so there was no point in him exaggerating. Moreover, from my own knowledge I know that this was the time that soldiers usually had to wake up, especially if they were travelling to a new destination.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work